AutoSamplingTheory.SALD.cycle91GeneralMovingTargetDiscreteConditionalKernelLowerObligation
Data definition / provenance and workflow record
Meaning and type
The result has data type AutoSamplingTheory.ProofObligation. A value of this type stores descriptions; it is not a proof of the statements in those descriptions.
Lean statement of this data definition
The part after the colon is the output data type. This declaration takes no mathematical proof inputs.
def cycle91GeneralMovingTargetDiscreteConditionalKernelLowerObligation :
ProofObligationConstruction and field-by-field explanation
Construct a data record from explicit fields and the audited defaults shown below.
This Lean definition constructs provenance or workflow data. It does not prove the mathematical statements stored as text. Status labels, named dependencies and citations are data, not compilation, proof or source certificates.
id:String(explicit)Stable obligation identifier.
sald.general_moving_target_discrete.cycle91_conditional_kernel_lowerstatement:String(explicit)Desired mathematical or workflow content as String; it is not a proposition in Prop and the def does not prove it.
Cycle 91 lower compiles SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteCondDistribNamedDriftRegularityOfSampleVersions, after SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteCondDistribNamedDriftRegularity. Under hatRhoS = Measure.map hatXAtS P, finite-measure/standard-Borel hypotheses, AEMeasurable hatXAtS and X_k^eta, AEStronglyMeasurable and Integrable frozen guide and score integrands on the joint law Measure.map (fun omega => (hatXAtS omega, X_k^eta omega)) P, measurable equality sets, and sample-space a.e. equalities between the canonical condDistrib component integrals composed with hatXAtS and condC/condScore composed with hatXAtS, the theorem proves AEStronglyMeasurable and Integrable barB under hatRhoS. Classification: discharges-supplied-hypothesis for the law-space component-version hypotheses and component-field/barB regularity hypotheses behind SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteConditionalKernelRegularityOfSwappedComponents and SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteEndpointConditionalDriftRegularityHandoff. Remaining source-cited boundary: prove the sample-space conditional-expectation/disintegration equalities and equality-set measurability for the SALD fields, plus conditional-kernel compatibility.source:AutoSamplingTheory.SourceAnchor(explicit)SourceAnchor supporting the intended requirement.
AutoSamplingTheory.SALD.saldGeneralMovingTargetDiscreteConditionalKernelMathlibSource— audited data reference, not expanded and not a compiled dependency edgestatus:AutoSamplingTheory.ProofStatus(explicit)Stored ProofStatus, default obligation; even an explicitly stored formalized does not independently certify a Lean theorem.
AutoSamplingTheory.ProofStatus.obligation— stored label only; no proof certificationdependsOn:List String(explicit)List of declared dependency names as strings; may mix theorem names, obligations, source labels, or descriptions. Not the compiled dependency DAG.
Ordered data items
- SALD.cycle91GeneralMovingTargetDiscreteConditionalKernelMiddleObligation
- SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteCondDistribNamedFieldAeEqOfSample
- SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteCondDistribNamedDriftRegularityOfSampleVersions
- SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteCondDistribNamedDriftRegularity
- AutoSamplingTheory.condDistribIntegralNamedFieldRegularity
- AutoSamplingTheory.condDistribIntegralNamedLawAEStronglyMeasurable
- AutoSamplingTheory.condDistribIntegralNamedLawIntegrable
- SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteNamedConditionalDriftRegularityOfComponents
- Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.CondDistrib
- proof:thm:general-moving-target-SALD-discrete:conditional-drift
- appendix.tex:1368-1377
- sald.general_moving_target_discrete.em_interpolation_fp
note:String(explicit)Recorded evidence/caveats; may distinguish a compiled scalar helper from still-open source analysis.
Proof-producing local theorem plus remaining obligation. It transports sample-space component version equalities through hatRhoS = Law(hatXAtS) using Mathlib ae_map_iff. It does not construct the conditional law, prove the sample-space conditional-expectation equalities, weak Fokker-Planck identity, KL derivative, LSI, DV, Gronwall, theorem closure, or any SLT result.
Exact Lean data construction
Each field assignment stores the corresponding value shown above. Omitted fields use the explicitly identified schema defaults. Strings that name theorems remain strings; they do not call those theorems.
def cycle91GeneralMovingTargetDiscreteConditionalKernelLowerObligation :
ProofObligation where
id := "sald.general_moving_target_discrete.cycle91_conditional_kernel_lower"
statement := "Cycle 91 lower compiles SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteCondDistribNamedDriftRegularityOfSampleVersions, after SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteCondDistribNamedDriftRegularity. Under hatRhoS = Measure.map hatXAtS P, finite-measure/standard-Borel hypotheses, AEMeasurable hatXAtS and X_k^eta, AEStronglyMeasurable and Integrable frozen guide and score integrands on the joint law Measure.map (fun omega => (hatXAtS omega, X_k^eta omega)) P, measurable equality sets, and sample-space a.e. equalities between the canonical condDistrib component integrals composed with hatXAtS and condC/condScore composed with hatXAtS, the theorem proves AEStronglyMeasurable and Integrable barB under hatRhoS. Classification: discharges-supplied-hypothesis for the law-space component-version hypotheses and component-field/barB regularity hypotheses behind SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteConditionalKernelRegularityOfSwappedComponents and SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteEndpointConditionalDriftRegularityHandoff. Remaining source-cited boundary: prove the sample-space conditional-expectation/disintegration equalities and equality-set measurability for the SALD fields, plus conditional-kernel compatibility."
source := saldGeneralMovingTargetDiscreteConditionalKernelMathlibSource
status := ProofStatus.obligation
dependsOn := [
"SALD.cycle91GeneralMovingTargetDiscreteConditionalKernelMiddleObligation",
"SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteCondDistribNamedFieldAeEqOfSample",
"SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteCondDistribNamedDriftRegularityOfSampleVersions",
"SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteCondDistribNamedDriftRegularity",
"AutoSamplingTheory.condDistribIntegralNamedFieldRegularity",
"AutoSamplingTheory.condDistribIntegralNamedLawAEStronglyMeasurable",
"AutoSamplingTheory.condDistribIntegralNamedLawIntegrable",
"SALD.generalMovingTargetDiscreteNamedConditionalDriftRegularityOfComponents",
"Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.CondDistrib",
"proof:thm:general-moving-target-SALD-discrete:conditional-drift",
"appendix.tex:1368-1377",
"sald.general_moving_target_discrete.em_interpolation_fp"
]
note := "Proof-producing local theorem plus remaining obligation. It transports sample-space component version equalities through hatRhoS = Law(hatXAtS) using Mathlib ae_map_iff. It does not construct the conditional law, prove the sample-space conditional-expectation equalities, weak Fokker-Planck identity, KL derivative, LSI, DV, Gronwall, theorem closure, or any SLT result."
/-- Cycle-91 proof-DAG pane for the conditional-kernel component-field
backfill. -/Existing module entry · Audited data-reader index · All teaching coverage