AutoSamplingTheory.SALD.discreteForwardKlDvFiniteLogMgfWitnessObligation
Data definition / provenance and workflow record
Meaning and type
The result has data type AutoSamplingTheory.ProofObligation. A value of this type stores descriptions; it is not a proof of the statements in those descriptions.
Lean statement of this data definition
The part after the colon is the output data type. This declaration takes no mathematical proof inputs.
def discreteForwardKlDvFiniteLogMgfWitnessObligation : ProofObligationConstruction and field-by-field explanation
Construct a data record from explicit fields and the audited defaults shown below.
This Lean definition constructs provenance or workflow data. It does not prove the mathematical statements stored as text. Status labels, named dependencies and citations are data, not compilation, proof or source certificates.
id:String(explicit)Stable obligation identifier.
sald.discrete_forward_kl.dv_finite_log_mgf_witnessstatement:String(explicit)Desired mathematical or workflow content as String; it is not a proposition in Prop and the def does not prove it.
Formalize the discrete DV side interface for appendix lines 493-523: with nu=hat rho_s, mu=tilde pi_s=pi_{t(s)}, and Z=alpha*||v_{t(s)}||^2, derive the finite log-mgf condition from the continuous alpha0-complexity assumption, expose common-space and absolute-continuity for the EM interpolation law, divide by alpha>0, and preserve the dot t(s)^2 scaling before the time-change step.source:AutoSamplingTheory.SourceAnchor(explicit)SourceAnchor supporting the intended requirement.
AutoSamplingTheory.SALD.saldForwardKlDiscreteDvVelocitySource— audited data reference, not expanded and not a compiled dependency edgestatus:AutoSamplingTheory.ProofStatus(explicit)Stored ProofStatus, default obligation; even an explicitly stored formalized does not independently certify a Lean theorem.
AutoSamplingTheory.ProofStatus.obligation— stored label only; no proof certificationdependsOn:List String(explicit)List of declared dependency names as strings; may mix theorem names, obligations, source labels, or descriptions. Not the compiled dependency DAG.
Ordered data items
- probability.dv_variational_formula
- def:alpha-complexity
- SALD.saldDvFiniteLogMgfContract
- sald.dv_variation.finite_log_mgf_interface
- sald.forward_kl.dv_alpha_mgf_monotonicity
- sald.forward_kl.dv_finite_log_mgf_witness
- sald.discrete_forward_kl.em_endpoint_laws
- sald.discrete_forward_kl.em_interpolation_fp
note:String(explicit)Recorded evidence/caveats; may distinguish a compiled scalar helper from still-open source analysis.
discreteForwardKlDvFiniteLogMgfWitnessContract narrows the Cycle 11 upper target to the theorem-specific EM-interpolation DV witness. It is not a new theorem assumption and does not mark DV or exponential-moment monotonicity formalized.
Exact Lean data construction
Each field assignment stores the corresponding value shown above. Omitted fields use the explicitly identified schema defaults. Strings that name theorems remain strings; they do not call those theorems.
def discreteForwardKlDvFiniteLogMgfWitnessObligation : ProofObligation where
id := "sald.discrete_forward_kl.dv_finite_log_mgf_witness"
statement := "Formalize the discrete DV side interface for appendix lines 493-523: with nu=hat rho_s, mu=tilde pi_s=pi_{t(s)}, and Z=alpha*||v_{t(s)}||^2, derive the finite log-mgf condition from the continuous alpha0-complexity assumption, expose common-space and absolute-continuity for the EM interpolation law, divide by alpha>0, and preserve the dot t(s)^2 scaling before the time-change step."
source := saldForwardKlDiscreteDvVelocitySource
status := ProofStatus.obligation
dependsOn := [
"probability.dv_variational_formula",
"def:alpha-complexity",
"SALD.saldDvFiniteLogMgfContract",
"sald.dv_variation.finite_log_mgf_interface",
"sald.forward_kl.dv_alpha_mgf_monotonicity",
"sald.forward_kl.dv_finite_log_mgf_witness",
"sald.discrete_forward_kl.em_endpoint_laws",
"sald.discrete_forward_kl.em_interpolation_fp"
]
note := "discreteForwardKlDvFiniteLogMgfWitnessContract narrows the Cycle 11 upper target to the theorem-specific EM-interpolation DV witness. It is not a new theorem assumption and does not mark DV or exponential-moment monotonicity formalized."Existing module entry · Audited data-reader index · All teaching coverage