Name the finite-coordinate Dirichlet and Fisher expressions
AutoSamplingTheory.lsiKlFiSqrtDensityFisherChainFiniteSumHandoffScalar · theorem · Teaching coverage
Statement
Let I be finite, r>0, and dr,dSqrt,dLog:I→ℝ satisfy the coefficient identities at every coordinate. If real numbers D and J are supplied to equal ∑dSqrt_i² and r∑dLog_i² respectively, then D=J/4.
All objects and hypotheses
- I has Fintype; r,D,J∈ℝ with r>0; dr,dSqrt,dLog:I→ℝ.
- D and J have the displayed finite-sum representations, and dSqrt_i=dr_i/(2√r), dLog_i=dr_i/r for every i.
Mathematical proof
1. Replace the named quantities by their sums
Use the two representation hypotheses to expose the finite-coordinate expressions.
Corresponding Lean step
rw [hdirichlet,hfisher]
2. Reuse the finite-sum identity
The earlier finite-coordinate algebra theorem identifies these expressions.
Corresponding Lean step
lsiKlFiSqrtDensityFisherChainFiniteSumScalar hr hdSqrt hdLog
Lean statement · lsiKlFiSqrtDensityFisherChainFiniteSumHandoffScalar
D and J are real values with supplied representations. Their names do not turn them into analytic Dirichlet energy or Fisher information automatically.
Braces mark parameters Lean can infer; square brackets request structures such as a measurable space or probability measure. Named hypotheses are mathematical premises, not facts established by this declaration. Section parameters are described in the mathematical hypotheses above; the module link retains their exact source context.
theorem lsiKlFiSqrtDensityFisherChainFiniteSumHandoffScalar
{ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {r dirichlet fisher : Real}
{dr dSqrt dLog : ι → Real}
(hr : 0 < r)
(hdirichlet : dirichlet = ∑ i, dSqrt i ^ 2)
(hfisher : fisher = r * ∑ i, dLog i ^ 2)
(hdSqrt : ∀ i, dSqrt i = (1 / (2 * Real.sqrt r)) * dr i)
(hdLog : ∀ i, dLog i = dr i / r) :
dirichlet = (1 / 4) * fisherLean proof · lsiKlFiSqrtDensityFisherChainFiniteSumHandoffScalar
Only substitution and the existing finite-sum result are used. No derivative identity or norm representation is established.
Braces mark parameters Lean can infer; square brackets request structures such as a measurable space or probability measure. Named hypotheses are mathematical premises, not facts established by this declaration. Section parameters are described in the mathematical hypotheses above; the module link retains their exact source context.
theorem lsiKlFiSqrtDensityFisherChainFiniteSumHandoffScalar
{ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {r dirichlet fisher : Real}
{dr dSqrt dLog : ι → Real}
(hr : 0 < r)
(hdirichlet : dirichlet = ∑ i, dSqrt i ^ 2)
(hfisher : fisher = r * ∑ i, dLog i ^ 2)
(hdSqrt : ∀ i, dSqrt i = (1 / (2 * Real.sqrt r)) * dr i)
(hdLog : ∀ i, dLog i = dr i / r) :
dirichlet = (1 / 4) * fisher := by
rw [hdirichlet, hfisher]
exact lsiKlFiSqrtDensityFisherChainFiniteSumScalar hr hdSqrt hdLog
/-- Integral handoff for the finite-coordinate Fisher chain rule.
After a Sobolev backend supplies coordinate derivative identities almost
everywhere for `sqrt(r)` and `log r`, this pushes the cycle-38 finite-sum
coefficient through the `pi`-integral. It is still below the full
vector-gradient/Fisher-information theorem: integrability, coordinate-to-vector
gradient equivalence, zero-density handling, and admissibility of `sqrt(r)`
remain separate obligations.
-/Scope and omitted-condition boundaries
- These are scalar, density-integral or supplied-derivative handoffs. They do not prove an LSI, the admissibility of its square-root-density test, the vector/Sobolev chain rule or the full KL–Fisher comparison.
- Named scalar handoff, not integration or geometric identification.
Source and reuse
ASTIS parents called
Mathlib API called (external library)
No direct Mathlib call recorded; see the ASTIS parents.
Mathematical sources
- Exact existing ASTIS declaration and body — Directly read local source; not a new proof or source-fidelity verdict.
- AutoSamplingTheory.lsiKlFiSqrtDensityFisherChainFiniteSumScalar — Existing root ASTIS dependency; use its own adjacent teaching unit.
ASTIS prose is not a quotation or a source-equivalence certificate. Definitions and aliases are explained as constructions, not counted as new mathematical proofs.