Tangent exponential steps remain on the unit sphere
AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Geometry.UnitSphere.unitSphereExp_norm_eq_one · theorem · Teaching coverage
Mathematical statement
A unit base point and an orthogonal increment produce an exponential-map value with exactly unit norm.
Lean statement · unitSphereExp_norm_eq_one
The theorem gives exact feasibility, not an asymptotic estimate.
Braces mark parameters Lean can infer; square brackets request structures such as a measurable space or probability measure. Named hypotheses are mathematical premises, not facts established by this declaration. Section parameters are described in the mathematical hypotheses above; the module link retains their exact source context.
theorem unitSphereExp_norm_eq_one
{w z : E}
(hw : ‖w‖ = 1)
(htan : ⟪w, z⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖unitSphereExp w z‖ = 1Proof roadmap
- 1Handle zero increment
At z=0, the exponential formula is w.
- 2Use orthogonality
The cosine and sinc components have zero cross inner product.
- 3Apply Pythagoras and trigonometry
The two squared norms are cos²r and sin²r.
- 4Use nonnegativity of norm
A nonnegative real with square one equals one.
Full assumptions and notation
All objects and hypotheses
- E is a real inner-product space.
- ‖w‖=1.
- ⟪w,z⟫=0.
- z=0 is allowed.
Mathematical proof
1. Handle zero increment
At z=0, the exponential formula is w.
Corresponding Lean step
Simplification uses the unit-norm premise.
2. Use orthogonality
The cosine and sinc components have zero cross inner product.
Corresponding Lean step
Inner-product scalar rules reduce this to ⟪w,z⟫=0.
3. Apply Pythagoras and trigonometry
The two squared norms are cos²r and sin²r.
Corresponding Lean step
norm_add_sq_real, Real.sinc_of_ne_zero, and Real.sin_sq_add_cos_sq prove the identity.
4. Use nonnegativity of norm
A nonnegative real with square one equals one.
Corresponding Lean step
Nonlinear arithmetic closes the final scalar step.
Lean verification
The exact proof begins folded immediately after the mathematical argument; the statement is folded beside the claim above.
Lean proof · unitSphereExp_norm_eq_one
The proof is the orthogonal norm identity plus sin²+cos²=1.
Braces mark parameters Lean can infer; square brackets request structures such as a measurable space or probability measure. Named hypotheses are mathematical premises, not facts established by this declaration. Section parameters are described in the mathematical hypotheses above; the module link retains their exact source context.
theorem unitSphereExp_norm_eq_one
{w z : E}
(hw : ‖w‖ = 1)
(htan : ⟪w, z⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖unitSphereExp w z‖ = 1 := by
by_cases hz : z = 0
· subst z
simp [unitSphereExp, hw]
· have hr : ‖z‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hz
have hcross :
⟪Real.cos ‖z‖ • w, Real.sinc ‖z‖ • z⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
simp [real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right, htan]
have hpyth :
‖unitSphereExp w z‖ ^ (2 : ℕ) =
‖Real.cos ‖z‖ • w‖ ^ (2 : ℕ) +
‖Real.sinc ‖z‖ • z‖ ^ (2 : ℕ) := by
rw [unitSphereExp, norm_add_sq_real, hcross]
ring
have hfirst :
‖Real.cos ‖z‖ • w‖ ^ (2 : ℕ) =
Real.cos ‖z‖ ^ (2 : ℕ) := by
simp [norm_smul, hw, sq_abs]
have hsinc :
Real.sinc ‖z‖ = Real.sin ‖z‖ / ‖z‖ :=
Real.sinc_of_ne_zero hr
have hsecond :
‖Real.sinc ‖z‖ • z‖ ^ (2 : ℕ) =
Real.sin ‖z‖ ^ (2 : ℕ) := by
rw [norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, hsinc]
have hrpos : 0 < ‖z‖ := norm_pos_iff.mpr hz
rw [abs_div, abs_of_pos hrpos]
rw [div_mul_cancel₀ _ hr]
exact sq_abs (Real.sin ‖z‖)
have hsq : ‖unitSphereExp w z‖ ^ (2 : ℕ) = 1 := by
rw [hpyth, hfirst, hsecond]
nlinarith [Real.sin_sq_add_cos_sq ‖z‖]
have hnonneg : 0 ≤ ‖unitSphereExp w z‖ := norm_nonneg _
nlinarith
end
end AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Geometry.UnitSphereScope and omitted-condition boundaries
- No algorithmic convergence theorem is included.
Sources, dependencies, and reuse
Source and reuse
Samplinglib parents called
Mathlib API called (external library)
No direct Mathlib call recorded; see the Samplinglib parents.
Mathematical sources
- Samplinglib compiled source — Exact statement and proof.
Samplinglib prose is not a quotation or a source-equivalence certificate. Definitions and aliases are explained as constructions, not counted as new mathematical proofs.