AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Analysis.GradientDescentOptimalStep
Read the mathematical statements and proofs in order
2 named declarations scanned from AutoSamplingTheory/TechnicalLemmas/Analysis/GradientDescentOptimalStep.lean.
Declarations
theorem AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Analysis.GradientDescentOptimalStep.gradient_step_endpoint_bound Partial Not mapped
Read the complete mathematical statement and proof, with Lean below each
- Actual gradient maps satisfy the endpoint spectral bound for nonnegative steps. The curvature moduli may be signed; all Hessians are derived from the C² objective.
theorem gradient_step_endpoint_bound {f : E → ℝ} {α β h : ℝ}
(hf : ContDiff ℝ 2 f) (hsc : StrongConvexOn univ α f) (hh : 0 ≤ h)
(hu : ∀ x y, f y ≤ f x + inner ℝ (gradient f x) (y - x) + β / 2 * ‖y - x‖ ^ 2)
(x y : E) :
‖(y - h • gradient f y) - (x - h • gradient f x)‖ ≤
max |1 - h * α| |1 - h * β| * ‖y - x‖ := by
let M := max |1 - h * α| |1 - h * β|
have hM : 0 ≤ M := (abs_nonneg _).trans (le_max_left _ _)
have hlo := (ConvexityC2.gradient_mono_iff_fderiv2_lower hf).mp (fun a b =>
StrongConvexFirstOrder.gradient_inner_lower_bound_of_strongConvexOn hsc
(fun z _ => ((hf.of_le (by norm_num) : ContDiff ℝ 1 f).differentiable_one z).hasGradientAt)
(mem_univ a) (mem_univ b))
have hup := (SmoothnessEquivalences.upper_model_iff_fderiv2_upper hf).mp hu
let R : (E →L[ℝ] ℝ) →L[ℝ] E :=
{ toFun := (toDual ℝ E).symm
map_add' := (toDual ℝ E).symm.map_add
map_smul' := by intros; simp
cont := (toDual ℝ E).symm.continuous }
let H (z : E) : E →L[ℝ] E := R.comp (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ f) z)
let A (z : E) : E →L[ℝ] E := ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ E - h • H z
let T : E → E := fun z => z - h • gradient f z
have hfd : ContDiff ℝ 1 (fderiv ℝ f) := hf.fderiv_right (by norm_num)
have hgrad (z : E) : HasFDerivAt (gradient f) (H z) z :=
R.hasFDerivAt.comp z (hfd.differentiable_one z).hasFDerivAt
have hTd (z : E) : HasFDerivAt T (A z) z :=
(hasFDerivAt_id z).sub ((hgrad z).const_smul h)
have hT : ContDiff ℝ 1 T := contDiff_id.sub ((R.contDiff.comp hfd).const_smul h)
have hinner (z v w : E) : inner ℝ (H z v) w = (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ f) z v) w :=
toDual_symm_apply
have hsym (z : E) : (A z).IsSymmetric := by
intro v w
change inner ℝ (v - h • H z v) w = inner ℝ v (w - h • H z w)
rw [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right]
have hr : inner ℝ v (H z w) = (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ f) z w) v :=
(real_inner_comm v (H z w)).symm.trans (hinner z w v)
rw [hinner, hr]
rw [hf.contDiffAt.isSymmSndFDerivAt (by norm_num) v w]
have hnorm (z : E) : ‖A z‖ ≤ M := by
rw [(A z).norm_eq_iSup_rayleighQuotient (hsym z)]
apply ciSup_le
intro v
change |inner ℝ (A z v) v / ‖v‖ ^ 2| ≤ M
by_cases hv : v = 0
· simp [hv]
-- Source excerpt truncated; follow the exact source link.
AutoSamplingTheory/TechnicalLemmas/Analysis/GradientDescentOptimalStep.lean:25published source at 0e31a3cda412Open detailed card
Excerpt truncated; the exact source link is authoritative.
theorem AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Analysis.GradientDescentOptimalStep.optimal_gradient_step Partial Not mapped
Read the complete mathematical statement and proof, with Lean below each
- The step `2/(α+β)` gives the sharp uniform curvature-envelope contraction. Its factor minimizes the endpoint max-envelope over every real step. The `α=0` boundary is nonexpansive, and `α=β` is retained.
theorem optimal_gradient_step {f : E → ℝ} {α β : ℝ}
(hf : ContDiff ℝ 2 f) (hsc : StrongConvexOn univ α f)
(hα : 0 ≤ α) (hβ : 0 < β) (hαβ : α ≤ β)
(hu : ∀ x y, f y ≤ f x + inner ℝ (gradient f x) (y - x) + β / 2 * ‖y - x‖ ^ 2)
(x y : E) :
‖(y - (2 / (α + β)) • gradient f y) - (x - (2 / (α + β)) • gradient f x)‖ ≤
((β - α) / (α + β)) * ‖y - x‖ ∧
∀ h : ℝ, (β - α) / (α + β) ≤ max |1 - h * α| |1 - h * β| := by
have hD : 0 < α + β := add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos hα hβ
have hq : 0 ≤ (β - α) / (α + β) := div_nonneg (sub_nonneg.mpr hαβ) hD.le
have ha : 1 - 2 / (α + β) * α = (β - α) / (α + β) := by field_simp; ring
have hb : 1 - 2 / (α + β) * β = -((β - α) / (α + β)) := by field_simp; ring
constructor
· have hc := gradient_step_endpoint_bound hf hsc (show 0 ≤ 2 / (α + β) by positivity) hu x y
simpa only [ha, hb, abs_neg, abs_of_nonneg hq, max_self] using hc
· intro h
let M := max |1 - h * α| |1 - h * β|
have ha' : 1 - h * α ≤ M := (le_abs_self _).trans (le_max_left _ _)
have hb' : -(1 - h * β) ≤ M := (neg_le_abs _).trans (le_max_right _ _)
apply (div_le_iff₀ hD).mpr
have h1 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ha' hβ.le
have h2 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hb' hα
nlinarith
end AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Analysis.GradientDescentOptimalStep
AutoSamplingTheory/TechnicalLemmas/Analysis/GradientDescentOptimalStep.lean:102published source at 0e31a3cda412Open detailed card