Samplinglib
Lean gate not recorded for this source state main · 9bb7a7394ab0

Construct the full orthogonal Haar draw

Huanjian Zhou and Taiji Suzuki, On Complexity of Gaussian Sampling. ASTIS explicates the standard Haar background invoked by the source.

arXiv:2610.20492v1 · Section2 first paragraph; AppendixB2.1 row-reflection invariance; Section4.1 Haar eigenbasis draw · faithful paraphrase

Complete source statement (Samplinglib restatement)

For every natural finite dimension n, define the full orthogonal Haar law by the actual Haar constructor normalized on the entire compact group O(n).

  • n is an arbitrary natural finite dimension. The paper applications use n>=3 or d>=2; the shared background also covers n=0.
  • O(n) is the full real orthogonal group O^T O=I, equipped with the subspace topology of finite real matrices and its Borel sigma-algebra. Both determinant signs are allowed whenever they exist.
  • Haar means left invariant, finite on compact sets and positive on nonempty open sets. Probability means total mass one. Compactness and second countability are proved internally, not assumed as public premises.

Haar background

\[\mu_n=\operatorname{Haar}_{K_0}(O(n)),\qquad K_0=O(n),\quad\mu_n(K_0)=1\]

Read the formalized proofs

Each statement and proof below has its own closed Lean disclosure. Samplinglib parents, Mathlib calls and external mathematical sources are distinguished in each proof.

Samplinglib mathematical lesson

Construct the full orthogonal Haar draw

AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Probability.OrthogonalHaar.orthogonalHaar · def · Teaching coverage

Read this first

Mathematical statement

For every natural finite dimension n, define the full orthogonal Haar law by the actual Haar constructor normalized on the entire compact group O(n).

\[\mu_n=\operatorname{Haar}_{K_0}(O(n)),\qquad K_0=O(n),\quad\mu_n(K_0)=1\]
Lean statement · orthogonalHaar

The measure lives on the actual full orthogonal subtype with its canonical Borel space. No abstract Haar law or compactness premise is supplied by the caller.

Braces mark parameters Lean can infer; square brackets request structures such as a measurable space or probability measure. Named hypotheses are mathematical premises, not facts established by this declaration. Section parameters are described in the mathematical hypotheses above; the module link retains their exact source context.

noncomputable def orthogonalHaar (n : ℕ) :
    Measure (Matrix.orthogonalGroup (Fin n) ℝ)

Exact module and namespace context

Proof roadmap

  1. 1Define only after well-definedness

    The preceding existence/uniqueness theorem was compiled and independently proof-reviewed before this production definition was written. Use the actual normalized Haar constructor on the same carrier, topology and Borel sigma-algebra. The separately named characterization follows.

Full assumptions and notation

All objects and hypotheses

  • n is an arbitrary natural finite dimension. The paper applications use n≥3 or d≥2; the shared background also covers n=0.
  • O(n) is the full real orthogonal group O^T O=I, equipped with the subspace topology of finite real matrices and its Borel sigma-algebra. Both determinant signs are allowed whenever they exist.
  • Haar means left invariant, finite on compact sets and positive on nonempty open sets. Probability means total mass one. Compactness and second countability are proved internally, not assumed as public premises.

Construction and meaning

1. Define only after well-definedness

The preceding existence/uniqueness theorem was compiled and independently proof-reviewed before this production definition was written. Use the actual normalized Haar constructor on the same carrier, topology and Borel sigma-algebra. The separately named characterization follows.

\[K_0=O(n),\qquad\mu_n=\operatorname{Haar}_{K_0}\]
Corresponding Lean step

The body is Measure.haarMeasure (top : PositiveCompacts O(n)). It does not call the preceding existence theorem; that theorem gates introduction of the object, and its proof is genuinely consumed by the later uniqueness characterization. The pre-definition snapshot and independent audit are retained in haar-well-definedness-input.json and haar-well-definedness-review.json.

Lean verification

The exact proof begins folded immediately after the mathematical argument; the statement is folded beside the claim above.

Lean construction · orthogonalHaar

The adjacent exact Lean constructs the law and discharges its topology, normalization and invariance dependencies internally.

Braces mark parameters Lean can infer; square brackets request structures such as a measurable space or probability measure. Named hypotheses are mathematical premises, not facts established by this declaration. Section parameters are described in the mathematical hypotheses above; the module link retains their exact source context.

Download module (.lean)
noncomputable def orthogonalHaar (n : ℕ) :
    Measure (Matrix.orthogonalGroup (Fin n) ℝ) :=
  Measure.haarMeasure (⊤ : PositiveCompacts (Matrix.orthogonalGroup (Fin n) ℝ))

Exact module and namespace context

Source assumptions versus formal assumptions

SourceActual LeanDifference kindWhy it matters
The paper invokes full orthogonal Haar probability in dimension n>=3 or d>=2 and uses fixed row-reflection invariance.All natural finite dimensions, canonical Borel full group, actual Haar constructor. The n=0 case is a singleton; no determinant component or conditional law is asserted.generalizationStandard background is expanded and proved internally. This disclosed dimension extension does not strengthen the paper conclusions or identify the two experiments beyond their common full Haar law.

Only the common full orthogonal Haar probability and fixed left multiplication invariance. Determinant-conditioned laws, component half-mass, principal-minor sign/zero expectation, Gaussian densities, independence from an algorithm seed, adaptive posterior invariance, Krylov reduction and both main lower bounds remain open. Dimension zero is included as a singleton group; no two-components claim is made there.

Encoder–denoiser: accepted · equivalent-after-elaboration

Detected semantic differences

  • domains: The shared Haar background is validly extended beyond the source application dimensions, including the singleton case n=0. — The raw applications are in n>=3 (Section B.2) or d>=2 (Section 4.1); the candidate expressly extends only the standard Haar background to all natural dimensions. The n=0 carrier is a singleton, so this extension is valid and does not import the source's two-component statement into dimension zero.
  • scopes: The candidate explicates the standard Haar background invoked by the paper rather than reproducing a verbatim source theorem. — The pinned original_text is an attributed ASTIS explication of the source's Haar notation, rather than a verbatim theorem proved in the paper. The construction/uniqueness/topology details are checked here against the current full module and pinned APIs; source attribution and source scope identify them as shared background.
  • scopes: The historical pre-definition review claim is outside the evidence certified by this bounded independent source review. — The lesson contains a historical pre-definition proof-review claim. Earlier audits were deliberately not opened; this claim is not used or independently certified by this source review.

A generalization is not a source correction. Proposed missing conditions require separate independent repair review. No proposed repair silently changes the original theorem.

Scope and omitted-condition boundaries
  • Only the common full orthogonal Haar probability and fixed left multiplication invariance. Determinant-conditioned laws, component half-mass, principal-minor sign/zero expectation, Gaussian densities, independence from an algorithm seed, adaptive posterior invariance, Krylov reduction and both main lower bounds remain open. Dimension zero is included as a singleton group; no two-components claim is made there.
Sources, dependencies, and reuse

Source and reuse

Samplinglib parents called

    Mathlib API called (external library)

    • MeasureTheory.Measure.haarMeasure

    Mathematical sources

    • Shared full Haar background — Background common to both experiments; only the fixed left-invariance part of the row-reflection argument.

    Samplinglib prose is not a quotation or a source-equivalence certificate. Definitions and aliases are explained as constructions, not counted as new mathematical proofs.

    Which proof obligations and prerequisites are covered?

    • TODO — not closed by these contributions Construct the full orthogonal Haar draw