Samplinglib
Lean gate not recorded for this source state main · 9bb7a7394ab0

Power perspective from Holder with infinite moments allowed

Fan Chen, Sinho Chewi, Jianfeng Lu and Matthew S. Zhang; ASTIS expanded ingredient proof, no author endorsement implied.

arXiv:2609.06906v1 · Lemma6.3(ii) expanded Holder perspective · faithful paraphrase

Complete source statement (Samplinglib restatement)

Let mu be any measure on a measurable space and a,b be almost-everywhere measurable extended nonnegative functions. Suppose b is positive and finite almost everywhere and its integral B is positive and finite. For real q>1, the qth power of integral a divided by B^(q-1) is at most the integral of a^q/b^(q-1). Neither the numerator integral nor the right-hand integral is assumed finite.

  • Any measurable space and measure mu; no probability or sigma-finiteness assumption is required for this scalar inequality.
  • a,b are ENNReal-valued and a.e. measurable. The denominator b is nonzero and finite mu-a.e.
  • The integral of b is nonzero and finite, and real q>1.
  • The integral of a and of a^q/b^(q-1) may be infinite. This general measure inequality is an expanded ingredient, not a printed paper theorem.

Integral perspective

\[\frac{(\int a\,d\mu)^q}{(\int b\,d\mu)^{q-1}}\le\int\frac{a^q}{b^{q-1}}\,d\mu,\qquad q>1,\quad 0<\int b\,d\mu<\infty.\]

Read the formalized proofs

Each statement and proof below has its own closed Lean disclosure. Samplinglib parents, Mathlib calls and external mathematical sources are distinguished in each proof.

Samplinglib mathematical lesson

Power perspective from Holder with infinite moments allowed

AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.PowerPerspective.lintegral_perspective_le · theorem · Teaching coverage

Read this first

Mathematical statement

Let mu be any measure on a measurable space and a,b be almost-everywhere measurable extended nonnegative functions. Suppose b is positive and finite almost everywhere and its integral B is positive and finite. For real q>1, the qth power of integral a divided by B^(q-1) is at most the integral of a^q/b^(q-1). Neither the numerator integral nor the right-hand integral is assumed finite.

\[\frac{(\int a\,d\mu)^q}{(\int b\,d\mu)^{q-1}}\le\int\frac{a^q}{b^{q-1}}\,d\mu,\qquad q>1,\quad 0<\int b\,d\mu<\infty.\]
Lean statement · lintegral_perspective_le

The extended nonnegative integral power-perspective inequality with only positive finite denominator conditions.

Braces mark parameters Lean can infer; square brackets request structures such as a measurable space or probability measure. Named hypotheses are mathematical premises, not facts established by this declaration. Section parameters are described in the mathematical hypotheses above; the module link retains their exact source context.

theorem lintegral_perspective_le {X : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] (μ : Measure X)
    (a b : X → ℝ≥0∞) (ha : AEMeasurable a μ) (hb : AEMeasurable b μ)
    (hbpos : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, b x ≠ 0 ∧ b x ≠ ⊤)
    (hB0 : (∫⁻ x, b x ∂μ) ≠ 0) (hBtop : (∫⁻ x, b x ∂μ) ≠ ⊤)
    (q : ℝ) (hq : 1 < q) :
    (∫⁻ x, a x ∂μ)^q / (∫⁻ x, b x ∂μ)^(q-1) ≤
      ∫⁻ x, a x^q / b x^(q-1) ∂μ

Exact module and namespace context

Proof roadmap

  1. 1Reconstruct the numerator pointwise

    Set F=a^q/b^(q-1), alpha=1/q and beta=1-1/q. Positive finite b permits cancellation of b^beta, while a may be zero or infinite. Therefore F^alpha b^beta=a almost everywhere.

  2. 2Apply nonnegative integral Holder

    The exponents alpha,beta are nonnegative and sum to one. Extended nonnegative Holder gives A≤C^(1/q) B^beta for A=integral a and C=integral F. This theorem does not require either A or C finite.

  3. 3Raise the inequality to q

    Since q>0, raising both sides preserves order. Real-power multiplication identities hold in ENNReal for these nonnegative powers and give A^q≤C B^(q-1).

  4. 4Divide by the positive finite denominator integral

    B is positive and finite, so B^(q-1) is nonzero and finite. The extended-real division equivalence gives the claimed perspective inequality without converting an infinite quantity to a real number.

Full assumptions and notation

All objects and hypotheses

  • Any measurable space and measure mu; no probability or sigma-finiteness assumption is required for this scalar inequality.
  • a,b are ENNReal-valued and a.e. measurable. The denominator b is nonzero and finite mu-a.e.
  • The integral of b is nonzero and finite, and real q>1.
  • The integral of a and of a^q/b^(q-1) may be infinite. This general measure inequality is an expanded ingredient, not a printed paper theorem.

Mathematical proof

1. Reconstruct the numerator pointwise

Set F=a^q/b^(q-1), alpha=1/q and beta=1-1/q. Positive finite b permits cancellation of b^beta, while a may be zero or infinite. Therefore F^alpha b^beta=a almost everywhere.

\[F^{1/q}b^{1-1/q}=\frac{a}{b^{1-1/q}}b^{1-1/q}=a.\]
Corresponding Lean step

ENNReal.div_rpow_of_nonneg, rpow_mul and div_mul_cancel with explicit nonzero/finite denominator.

2. Apply nonnegative integral Holder

The exponents alpha,beta are nonnegative and sum to one. Extended nonnegative Holder gives A≤C^(1/q) B^beta for A=integral a and C=integral F. This theorem does not require either A or C finite.

\[A\le C^{1/q}B^{1-1/q}.\]
Corresponding Lean step

ENNReal.lintegral_mul_norm_pow_le and lintegral_congr_ae use the reconstruction, retaining infinite branches.

3. Raise the inequality to q

Since q>0, raising both sides preserves order. Real-power multiplication identities hold in ENNReal for these nonnegative powers and give A^q≤C B^(q-1).

\[A^q\le C B^{q-1}.\]
Corresponding Lean step

ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow, mul_rpow_of_nonneg and rpow_mul; exact scalar exponent identities.

4. Divide by the positive finite denominator integral

B is positive and finite, so B^(q-1) is nonzero and finite. The extended-real division equivalence gives the claimed perspective inequality without converting an infinite quantity to a real number.

\[\frac{A^q}{B^{q-1}}\le C.\]
Corresponding Lean step

ENNReal.div_le_iff, rpow_pos and rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg.

Lean verification

The exact proof begins folded immediately after the mathematical argument; the statement is folded beside the claim above.

Lean proof · lintegral_perspective_le

Direct Holder, pointwise reconstruction and exact power/division algebra; no assumed perspective or moment inequality.

Braces mark parameters Lean can infer; square brackets request structures such as a measurable space or probability measure. Named hypotheses are mathematical premises, not facts established by this declaration. Section parameters are described in the mathematical hypotheses above; the module link retains their exact source context.

Download module (.lean)
theorem lintegral_perspective_le {X : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] (μ : Measure X)
    (a b : X → ℝ≥0∞) (ha : AEMeasurable a μ) (hb : AEMeasurable b μ)
    (hbpos : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, b x ≠ 0 ∧ b x ≠ ⊤)
    (hB0 : (∫⁻ x, b x ∂μ) ≠ 0) (hBtop : (∫⁻ x, b x ∂μ) ≠ ⊤)
    (q : ℝ) (hq : 1 < q) :
    (∫⁻ x, a x ∂μ)^q / (∫⁻ x, b x ∂μ)^(q-1) ≤
      ∫⁻ x, a x^q / b x^(q-1) ∂μ := by
  have hq0 : 0 < q := by linarith
  have hi : 0 ≤ 1/q := by positivity
  have hj : 0 ≤ 1-1/q := by rw [sub_nonneg,div_le_one hq0]; linarith
  have he1 : q*(1/q) = 1 := by field_simp
  have he2 : (q-1)*(1/q) = 1-1/q := by field_simp
  have he3 : (1-1/q)*q = q-1 := by field_simp
  have hrec : (fun x => (a x^q / b x^(q-1))^(1/q) * b x^(1-1/q)) =ᵐ[μ] a := by
    filter_upwards [hbpos] with x hx
    rw [ENNReal.div_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hi, ← ENNReal.rpow_mul,
      ← ENNReal.rpow_mul,he1,he2,ENNReal.rpow_one]
    exact ENNReal.div_mul_cancel
      (ne_of_gt (ENNReal.rpow_pos (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hx.1) hx.2))
      (ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg hj hx.2)
  have h := ENNReal.lintegral_mul_norm_pow_le
    ((ha.pow_const q).div (hb.pow_const (q-1))) hb hi hj (by ring : 1/q+(1-1/q)=1)
  change (∫⁻ x, (a x^q / b x^(q-1))^(1/q) * b x^(1-1/q) ∂μ) ≤
    (∫⁻ x, a x^q / b x^(q-1) ∂μ)^(1/q) * (∫⁻ x, b x ∂μ)^(1-1/q) at h
  rw [lintegral_congr_ae hrec] at h
  have hh := ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow h hq0.le
  rw [ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hq0.le, ← ENNReal.rpow_mul,
    ← ENNReal.rpow_mul,he3,mul_comm (1/q) q,he1,ENNReal.rpow_one] at hh
  exact (ENNReal.div_le_iff
    (ne_of_gt (ENNReal.rpow_pos (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hB0) hBtop))
    (ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (by linarith) hBtop)).mpr hh

end AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.PowerPerspective

Exact module and namespace context

Source assumptions versus formal assumptions

SourceActual LeanDifference kindWhy it matters
SPHMC Lemma6.3(ii) invokes Gaussian reverse transport on Euclidean probability measures with marginal Pp membership.Arbitrary measurable space and measure for the scalar Holder perspective.generalizationExplicit expanded ingredient with independently proved denominator conditions; finite displacement does not imply marginal moments.
The full lemma first chooses one truncation proxy, then applies the Winfinity Gaussian reverse-transport bound for all q>1.Scalar integral perspective only.API-limitationNo truncation composition, complete Wasserstein/Renyi API, warmness recursion or sampler cost is claimed.
Positive heat time, q>1 and coefficient q/(2tau).Real q>1; in the consumer tau>0,t>=0 and exact q(q-1)t^2/(2tau) moment and qt^2/(2tau) logarithm bounds.sameCovariance tau I comes from sqrt(tau) noise. RN direction and denominator law agree.
Mixture density, Holder and finite-moment details omitted in the invoked standard reverse-transport step.Positive finite denominator conditions explicit in shared leaf; all Gaussian mixture densities, actual laws, integrability and log positivity proved in consumer.source-implicitNo assumed mixture inequality or Gaussian density/moment contract replaces the proof.

Expanded bounded-displacement Gaussian mixture ingredient of SPHMC Lemma6.3(ii). The actual coupling is supplied; choosing a single truncation proxy before all q remains separate. No marginal moment conclusion, complete Wasserstein/Renyi API, proxy-warmness, sampler or query-cost theorem.

Encoder–denoiser: accepted · domain-mismatch

Detected semantic differences

  • domains: Explicit generalization beyond Euclidean probability application. — Only MeasurableSpace X and Measure X domain data.
  • scopes: Selected expanded prerequisite, not equivalence with complete printed Lemma6.3(ii). — Documentation and publication explicitly keep Gaussian application and truncation separate.

A generalization is not a source correction. Proposed missing conditions require separate independent repair review. No proposed repair silently changes the original theorem.

Scope and omitted-condition boundaries
  • Expanded bounded-displacement Gaussian mixture ingredient of SPHMC Lemma6.3(ii). The actual coupling is supplied; choosing a single truncation proxy before all q remains separate. No marginal moment conclusion, complete Wasserstein/Renyi API, proxy-warmness, sampler or query-cost theorem.
Sources, dependencies, and reuse

Source and reuse

Samplinglib parents called

    Mathlib API called (external library)

    • ENNReal.lintegral_mul_norm_pow_le
    • ENNReal.div_le_iff
    • ENNReal.rpow_mul

    Mathematical sources

    Samplinglib prose is not a quotation or a source-equivalence certificate. Definitions and aliases are explained as constructions, not counted as new mathematical proofs.

    Which proof obligations and prerequisites are covered?

    • Independently verified prerequisite Extended nonnegative Holder perspective with potentially infinite numerator and right side