Samplinglib
Lean gate not recorded for this source state main · ed709a7f320d
Registry leaf card · pbps.actualPhysicalTimeCover

actual_fixed_reference_physical_time_cover

compiled Samplinglib leaf Not mapped module/build coverage

Independently verified science 56e4b7e101a1016e03df2971018b1f018f03e6c1. With the original six analytic binders and canonical actual input, every finite physical time almost surely lies in a unique actual half-open event interval and selects a unique actual live record with stored time<=t and finite elapsed offset<actual next wait. No positive-wait/index/live-record/clock/nonaccumulation provider premise. Last live arc remains available when next wait is infinity. No global interpolation/measurability/origin/Markov/invariance/kernel/hypocoercivity/main/error/expected-cost/composition or whole-paper/Goal completion. Aggregate/visual/main/PURIFIED/live remain separate.

Plain-English statement

Independently verified science 56e4b7e101a1016e03df2971018b1f018f03e6c1. With the original six analytic binders and canonical actual input, every finite physical time almost surely lies in a unique actual half-open event interval and selects a unique actual live record with stored time<=t and finite elapsed offset<actual next wait. No positive-wait/index/live-record/clock/nonaccumulation provider premise. Last live arc remains available when next wait is infinity. No global interpolation/measurability/origin/Markov/invariance/kernel/hypocoercivity/main/error/expected-cost/composition or whole-paper/Goal completion. Aggregate/visual/main/PURIFIED/live remain separate.

Scope guard. This card records a compiled local declaration. Its mathematical scope is exactly the Lean statement below; the Registry note and source correspondence may describe motivation but do not strengthen it.
Lean learning studio · mathematics → formal proof

Read the mathematics first, then descend into Lean

You do not need to know Lean before opening this panel. The page keeps the paper-level theorem, rigorous proof obligations, exact Lean declaration, and proof dependencies as separate layers so a first-time reader can move down one layer at a time.

BeginnerWhy this theorem exists → intuition → statement → one hand calculation. Hide proof-engineering detail.
RigorousExpose assumptions, hidden measure/limit/domain issues, proof route, and rigorous references.
Lean learnerOpen the exact declaration, proof tree/network, syntax glossary, and line-by-line explanation.

Proof architecture

Start with the tree when learning: prerequisites sit below the theorem and downstream results sit above it. Switch to the network when you want to understand where this declaration lives in the local formal library. Every mapped node is clickable.

Loading source-derived dependency evidence…

Graph rule: only dependencies found by the ASTIS source scan are drawn. Missing tactic indirection is treated as an under-approximation; the site never invents an edge just to make a prettier graph.

How to read the exact Lean declaration

Read a Lean theorem left-to-right exactly as you would unpack a mathematical sentence: name → ambient types → automatically inferred structures → explicit hypotheses → conclusion → proof. Then read the proof top-to-bottom as transformations of the current goal.

  1. NameWhat reusable mathematical fact is being created?
  2. ParametersWhich symbols are arbitrary, and which structures are inferred by typeclass search?
  3. PropositionAfter the colon, translate the Lean expression back into a paper statement.
  4. Proof actionsAfter by, ask what each tactic does to the mathematical goal—not only what syntax it uses.

Syntax used on this page

This glossary is filtered to syntax that actually occurs in the declaration above. Open a symbol only when you meet it, rather than memorizing Lean grammar in advance.

Source voice and ASTIS voice stay separate

When Samplinglib shows a short quotation from Chewi, it is labeled as a source excerpt and linked to the canonical book page. Intuition, expanded proof steps, hidden regularity assumptions, and Lean explanations are ASTIS-authored commentary. A quotation never substitutes for a formal proof, and an ASTIS explanation is never attributed to the textbook author.

Lean statement

theorem actual_fixed_reference_physical_time_cover
    {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
    [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
    {V : E → ℝ} {α β : ℝ≥0} {η : ℝ}
    (hα : 0 < (α : ℝ)) (hαβ : α ≤ β) (hV : ContDiff ℝ 2 V)
    (hH : ∀ x v : E,
      (α : ℝ) * ‖v‖ ^ 2 ≤ (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ∧
      (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ≤ (β : ℝ) * ‖v‖ ^ 2)
    (hη : 0 < η) (hβη : (β : ℝ) * η ≤ 1) :
    actual_fixed_reference_physical_time_cover_statement hα hαβ hV hH hη hβη := by
  classical
  let P : Measure (ℕ → ℝ) := Measure.infinitePi (fun _ : ℕ => expMeasure (1 : ℝ))
  let ε : (ℕ → ℝ) → ℕ → ℝ≥0 := fun sample k => Real.toNNReal (sample k)
  let c : E → E → E := fun y xRef => y - η • gradient V xRef
  let Φ : E → E → ℝ → (E × E) → (E × E) := fun y xRef t z =>
    (c y xRef + Real.cos t • (z.1 - c y xRef) +
        (Real.sqrt η * Real.sin t) • z.2,
     (-Real.sin t / Real.sqrt η) • (z.1 - c y xRef) + Real.cos t • z.2)
  let S : E → (E × E) → (E × E) := fun xRef z =>
    (z.1, z.2 - (2 * inner ℝ z.2 (gradient V z.1 - gradient V xRef) /
      ‖gradient V z.1 - gradient V xRef‖ ^ 2) • (gradient V z.1 - gradient V xRef))
  let rate : E → (E × E) → ℝ := fun xRef z =>
    Real.sqrt η * max 0 (inner ℝ z.2 (gradient V z.1 - gradient V xRef))
  let Λ : E → E → (E × E) → ℝ≥0 → ℝ := fun y xRef z t =>
    ∫ s in (0 : ℝ)..(t : ℝ), rate xRef (Φ y xRef s z)
  let τ : E → E → (E × E) → ℝ≥0 → WithTop ℝ≥0 := fun y xRef z e =>
    MeasureTheory.hittingAfter
      (fun t : ℝ≥0 => fun a : (E × E) × (E × E) × ℝ≥0 =>
        Λ a.1.1 a.1.2 a.2.1 t - (a.2.2 : ℝ))
      (Set.Ici (0 : ℝ)) 0 ((y, xRef), z, e)
  let next : E → E → ℝ≥0 → ((ℝ≥0 × (E × E)) ⊕ Unit) →
      ((ℝ≥0 × (E × E)) ⊕ Unit) := fun y xRef e r =>
    match r with
    | Sum.inr _ => Sum.inr ()
    | Sum.inl a =>
      if τ y xRef a.2 e = ⊤ then Sum.inr () else
        Sum.inl (a.1 + (τ y xRef a.2 e).untopD 0,
          S xRef (Φ y xRef (((τ y xRef a.2 e).untopD 0 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) a.2))
  let record : E → E → (E × E) → (ℕ → ℝ≥0) → ℕ →
      ((ℝ≥0 × (E × E)) ⊕ Unit) := fun y xRef z₀ e n =>
    Nat.rec (Sum.inl (0, z₀)) (fun k r => next y xRef (e k) r) n
  let eventTime : E → E → (E × E) → (ℕ → ℝ≥0) → ℕ → WithTop ℝ≥0 :=
    fun y xRef z₀ e n => (record y xRef z₀ e n).elim
      (fun a => (a.1 : WithTop ℝ≥0)) (fun _ => ⊤)
  change ∀ y xRef : E, ∀ z₀ : E × E, ∀ᵐ sample ∂P,
    (∀ t : ℝ≥0, ∃! n : ℕ,
      eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample) n ≤ (t : WithTop ℝ≥0) ∧
      (t : WithTop ℝ≥0) < eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample) (n + 1)) ∧
    (∀ t : ℝ≥0, ∀ n : ℕ,
      eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample) n ≤ (t : WithTop ℝ≥0) →
      (t : WithTop ℝ≥0) < eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample) (n + 1) →
      ∃! a : ℝ≥0 × (E × E),
        record y xRef z₀ (ε sample) n = Sum.inl a ∧ a.1 ≤ t ∧
        ((t - a.1 : ℝ≥0) : WithTop ℝ≥0) < τ y xRef a.2 (ε sample n))
  -- Exact deterministic initialization/monotonicity and guarded live-record updates.
  rcases ActualFiniteJumpRecursion.actual_fixed_reference_finite_jump_recursion
      hα hαβ hV hH hη hβη with
    ⟨_, hstep, _, _, _, htime, _, _, _, _⟩
  have hinput := ActualNonaccumulation.actual_fixed_reference_event_time_nonaccumulation
    hα hαβ hV hH hη hβη
  intro y xRef z₀
  filter_upwards [hinput y xRef z₀] with sample hgood
  have hzero : eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample) 0 = 0 :=
    (htime y xRef z₀ (ε sample)).1
  have hmono : Monotone (eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample)) :=
    (htime y xRef z₀ (ε sample)).2
  constructor
  · -- The first clock strictly above t has an initialized finite predecessor.
    intro t
    obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := eventually_atTop.mp (hgood.1 t)
    have hex : ∃ k : ℕ, (t : WithTop ℝ≥0) < eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample) k :=
      ⟨N, hN N le_rfl⟩
    let k : ℕ := Nat.find hex
    have hk : (t : WithTop ℝ≥0) < eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample) k :=
      Nat.find_spec hex
    have hkpos : 0 < k := by
      by_contra h
      have hk0 : k = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_not_pos h
      rw [hk0, hzero] at hk
      exact (not_lt_of_ge (show (0 : WithTop ℝ≥0) ≤ t from bot_le)) hk
    let n : ℕ := k - 1
    have hsucc : n + 1 = k := by dsimp [n]; omega
    have hlow : eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample) n ≤ (t : WithTop ℝ≥0) := by
      apply le_of_not_gt
      exact Nat.find_min hex (by change k - 1 < k; omega)
    have hupp : (t : WithTop ℝ≥0) < eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample) (n + 1) := by
      simpa only [hsucc] using hk
    refine ⟨n, ⟨hlow, hupp⟩, ?_⟩
    -- Monotonicity makes distinct half-open event intervals disjoint.
    intro m hm
    apply le_antisymm
    · by_contra h
      have hnm : n + 1 ≤ m := by omega
      exact (not_lt_of_ge ((hmono hnm).trans hm.1)) hupp
    · by_contra h
      have hmn : m + 1 ≤ n := by omega
      exact (not_lt_of_ge ((hmono hmn).trans hlow)) hm.2
  · -- A clock below finite t cannot be a stopped record.
    intro t n hlow hupp
    cases hr : record y xRef z₀ (ε sample) n with
    | inr u =>
      have hevent : eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample) n = ⊤ := by
        change (record y xRef z₀ (ε sample) n).elim _ _ = ⊤
        rw [hr]
        rfl
      rw [hevent] at hlow
      exact False.elim ((not_le_of_gt (WithTop.coe_lt_top t)) hlow)
    | inl a =>
      have haClock : eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample) n = (a.1 : WithTop ℝ≥0) := by
        change (record y xRef z₀ (ε sample) n).elim _ _ = _
        rw [hr]
        rfl
      have hat : a.1 ≤ t := WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp (by
        rw [← haClock]
        exact hlow)
      refine ⟨a, ⟨rfl, hat, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
      · -- Infinite wait keeps the last live arc available at every finite offset.
        by_cases hwtop : τ y xRef a.2 (ε sample n) = ⊤
        · simp only [hwtop, WithTop.coe_lt_top]
        -- Finite wait: the actual next clock is a.time plus that same wait.
        · let q : ℝ≥0 := (τ y xRef a.2 (ε sample n)).untop hwtop
          have hq : (q : WithTop ℝ≥0) = τ y xRef a.2 (ε sample n) :=
            WithTop.coe_untop _ _
          have hn : record y xRef z₀ (ε sample) (n + 1) =
              Sum.inl (a.1 + (τ y xRef a.2 (ε sample n)).untopD 0,
                S xRef (Φ y xRef (((τ y xRef a.2 (ε sample n)).untopD 0 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) a.2)) :=
            ((hstep y xRef z₀ (ε sample) n).2 a hr).2 hwtop
          rw [← hq] at hn ⊢
          have hnTime : eventTime y xRef z₀ (ε sample) (n + 1) =
              ((a.1 + q : ℝ≥0) : WithTop ℝ≥0) := by
            change (record y xRef z₀ (ε sample) (n + 1)).elim _ _ = _
            rw [hn]
            rfl
          have hsmall : t < a.1 + q := WithTop.coe_lt_coe.mp (by
            simpa only [hnTime] using hupp)
          exact WithTop.coe_lt_coe.mpr ((tsub_lt_iff_right hat).mpr (by
            simpa only [add_comm] using hsmall))
      · -- The stored record is a function; injectivity gives uniqueness.
        intro b hb
        exact Sum.inl.inj hb.1.symm

end
end AutoSamplingTheory.ExampleCases.ProximalBPS.ActualPhysicalTimeCover

Proof architecture

PBPS measurable physical-time interpolation prerequisite; no SALD claim

Lean proof walkthrough

  • Read the quantified variables and typeclass brackets as part of the mathematical statement; inferred arguments are not missing assumptions.
  • `intro` introduces quantified hypotheses into the local proof context.
  • `have` creates a named intermediate mathematical fact.
  • `rw` rewrites by an established identity.
  • `simp` normalizes through registered definitional and theorem rewrites.
  • `apply` reduces the goal to the hypotheses of a reusable theorem.
  • `refine` instantiates a reusable theorem while leaving explicit subgoals.
  • `exact` closes the current goal with an already typed term.

Why the statement has this shape

The declaration is kept at the reusable level recorded by its Registry tags and direct consumers. Explicit measures, spaces, wrappers, and regularity hypotheses expose interfaces that paper notation often infers. A theorem card explains those interfaces but never widens the compiled statement.

Hidden assumptions and non-claims

  • Measurability is represented explicitly or must be supplied by a dependency.
  • Totalized `fderiv` values must not be read as a differentiability theorem.
Common pitfall. A wrapper or display identity is not a new analytic theorem merely because it has its own Lean name. Check the statement, hypotheses, and downstream consumers before interpreting its mathematical contribution.