Samplinglib
Lean gate not recorded for this source state main · ed709a7f320d
Registry leaf card · pbps.actualCenteredSelfadjointDefect

actual_centered_selfadjoint_defect

compiled Samplinglib leaf Not mapped explicit smoke test

Original C2/global two Hessian/positive capped eta. Actual stationary reflected Gaussian kernel produces real L2 selfadjoint mean operator and canonical AE constant; its whole closed centered restriction and actual full/centered positive squared defects are proved. Real Test consumes exact58 macro contraction for rho/delta and IsUnit of the squared defect only on the centered domain. Rank-zero extension and alpha*eta=1 retained; no finite-dimensional L2 or caller regularity/root certificate. Gamma/root/polar/fullH1/dynamics/main/error/cost/composition remain open. Independently verified 2d6cd0167adc4fae1d8d166068a2eda51cd3c3ad.

Plain-English statement

Original C2/global two Hessian/positive capped eta. Actual stationary reflected Gaussian kernel produces real L2 selfadjoint mean operator and canonical AE constant; its whole closed centered restriction and actual full/centered positive squared defects are proved. Real Test consumes exact58 macro contraction for rho/delta and IsUnit of the squared defect only on the centered domain. Rank-zero extension and alpha*eta=1 retained; no finite-dimensional L2 or caller regularity/root certificate. Gamma/root/polar/fullH1/dynamics/main/error/cost/composition remain open. Independently verified 2d6cd0167adc4fae1d8d166068a2eda51cd3c3ad.

Scope guard. This card records a compiled local declaration. Its mathematical scope is exactly the Lean statement below; the Registry note and source correspondence may describe motivation but do not strengthen it.
Lean learning studio · mathematics → formal proof

Read the mathematics first, then descend into Lean

You do not need to know Lean before opening this panel. The page keeps the paper-level theorem, rigorous proof obligations, exact Lean declaration, and proof dependencies as separate layers so a first-time reader can move down one layer at a time.

BeginnerWhy this theorem exists → intuition → statement → one hand calculation. Hide proof-engineering detail.
RigorousExpose assumptions, hidden measure/limit/domain issues, proof route, and rigorous references.
Lean learnerOpen the exact declaration, proof tree/network, syntax glossary, and line-by-line explanation.

Proof architecture

Start with the tree when learning: prerequisites sit below the theorem and downstream results sit above it. Switch to the network when you want to understand where this declaration lives in the local formal library. Every mapped node is clickable.

Loading source-derived dependency evidence…

Graph rule: only dependencies found by the ASTIS source scan are drawn. Missing tactic indirection is treated as an under-approximation; the site never invents an edge just to make a prettier graph.

How to read the exact Lean declaration

Read a Lean theorem left-to-right exactly as you would unpack a mathematical sentence: name → ambient types → automatically inferred structures → explicit hypotheses → conclusion → proof. Then read the proof top-to-bottom as transformations of the current goal.

  1. NameWhat reusable mathematical fact is being created?
  2. ParametersWhich symbols are arbitrary, and which structures are inferred by typeclass search?
  3. PropositionAfter the colon, translate the Lean expression back into a paper statement.
  4. Proof actionsAfter by, ask what each tactic does to the mathematical goal—not only what syntax it uses.

Syntax used on this page

This glossary is filtered to syntax that actually occurs in the declaration above. Open a symbol only when you meet it, rather than memorizing Lean grammar in advance.

Source voice and ASTIS voice stay separate

When Samplinglib shows a short quotation from Chewi, it is labeled as a source excerpt and linked to the canonical book page. Intuition, expanded proof steps, hidden regularity assumptions, and Lean explanations are ASTIS-authored commentary. A quotation never substitutes for a formal proof, and an ASTIS explanation is never attributed to the textbook author.

Lean statement

theorem actual_centered_selfadjoint_defect
    {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
    [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
    {V : E → ℝ} {α β : ℝ≥0} {η : ℝ}
    (hα : 0 < (α : ℝ)) (hαβ : α ≤ β) (hV : ContDiff ℝ 2 V)
    (hH : ∀ x v : E,
      (α : ℝ)*‖v‖^2 ≤ (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ∧
      (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ≤ (β : ℝ)*‖v‖^2)
    (hη : 0 < η) (hβη : (β : ℝ)*η ≤ 1) :
    let μ := (volume : Measure E).tilted (fun x => -V x)
    let J := (μ.prod (stdGaussian E)).map
      (fun p : E × E => (p.1,p.1+Real.sqrt η • p.2))
    let ν := J.snd
    let Λ := J.map (fun p : E × E => (p.2,(2 : ℝ) • p.1-p.2))
    let F := fun p : E × E => (p.1,(2 : ℝ) • p.1-p.2)
    let P : Lp ℝ 2 J →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 J :=
      (lpMeas ℝ ℝ (MeasurableSpace.comap Prod.snd (inferInstance : MeasurableSpace E))
        2 J).subtypeL ∘L condExpL2 ℝ ℝ measurable_snd.comap_le
    IsProbabilityMeasure μ ∧ IsProbabilityMeasure J ∧ IsProbabilityMeasure ν ∧
    ∃ S : Kernel E E, IsMarkovKernel S ∧
      (∀ y, S y = (volume : Measure E).tilted
        (fun x => -V ((1/2 : ℝ) • (y+x)) - ‖y-x‖^2/(8*η))) ∧
      Λ.IsCondKernel S ∧ Λ.fst = ν ∧ Λ.snd = ν ∧
      ∃ U : Lp ℝ 2 J →ₗᵢ[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 J,
        (∀ g : Lp ℝ 2 J, (U g : E × E → ℝ) =ᵐ[J] g ∘ F) ∧
        Function.Involutive U ∧ IsSelfAdjoint U.toContinuousLinearMap ∧
        ∃ M : Lp ℝ 2 ν →ₗᵢ[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 J,
          (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, (M u : E × E → ℝ) =ᵐ[J] u ∘ Prod.snd) ∧
          ∃ T : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν,
            IsSelfAdjoint T ∧
            (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν,
              P (M u) = M u ∧
              M (T u) = (P * U.toContinuousLinearMap * P) (M u) ∧
              ‖T u‖ ≤ ‖u‖ ∧
              (T u : E → ℝ) =ᵐ[ν] (fun y => ∫ x, u x ∂S y) ∧
              (∫ y, T u y ∂ν) = ∫ y, u y ∂ν) ∧
            ∃ q : Lp ℝ 2 ν,
              (q : E → ℝ) =ᵐ[ν] (fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) ∧ T q = q ∧
              (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, inner ℝ q u = ∫ y, u y ∂ν) ∧
              (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, u ∈ ((innerSL ℝ q).ker) ↔ (∫ y, u y ∂ν) = 0) ∧
              ((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T).IsPositive ∧ ((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) q = 0 ∧
              (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν,
                inner ℝ (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) u) u = ‖u‖^2-‖T u‖^2) ∧
              ∃ T0 : ((innerSL ℝ q).ker) →L[ℝ] ((innerSL ℝ q).ker),
                (∀ u : ((innerSL ℝ q).ker), (T0 u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) = T u) ∧
                IsSelfAdjoint T0 ∧ (∀ u : ((innerSL ℝ q).ker), ‖T0 u‖ ≤ ‖u‖) ∧
                ((1 : ((innerSL ℝ q).ker) →L[ℝ] ((innerSL ℝ q).ker))-T0*T0).IsPositive ∧
                (∀ u : ((innerSL ℝ q).ker), (((1 : ((innerSL ℝ q).ker) →L[ℝ] ((innerSL ℝ q).ker))-T0*T0) u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) = ((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) u) ∧
                (∀ u : ((innerSL ℝ q).ker),
                  inner ℝ (((1 : ((innerSL ℝ q).ker) →L[ℝ] ((innerSL ℝ q).ker))-T0*T0) u) u = ‖u‖^2-‖T0 u‖^2) := by
  classical
  dsimp only
  let μ := (volume : Measure E).tilted (fun x => -V x)
  let J := (μ.prod (stdGaussian E)).map
    (fun p : E × E => (p.1,p.1+Real.sqrt η • p.2))
  let ν := J.snd
  let Λ := J.map (fun p : E × E => (p.2,(2 : ℝ) • p.1-p.2))
  let P : Lp ℝ 2 J →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 J :=
    (lpMeas ℝ ℝ (MeasurableSpace.comap Prod.snd (inferInstance : MeasurableSpace E))
      2 J).subtypeL ∘L condExpL2 ℝ ℝ measurable_snd.comap_le
  have hBase := L2MacroscopicMean.actual_macroscopic_l2_mean hα hαβ hV hH hη hβη
  rcases hBase with ⟨hμ,hJ,hν,S,hS,hSd,hSc,hSf,hSs,U,hU,hUi,hUs,M,hM,T,hAll⟩
  letI : IsProbabilityMeasure μ := hμ
  letI : IsProbabilityMeasure J := hJ
  letI : IsProbabilityMeasure ν := hν
  letI : IsMarkovKernel S := hS
  letI : Λ.IsCondKernel S := hSc
  have hPs (f g : Lp ℝ 2 J) : inner ℝ (P f) g = inner ℝ f (P g) :=
    inner_condExpL2_left_eq_right measurable_snd.comap_le
  have hTs : IsSelfAdjoint T := by
    apply ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric.mpr
    intro u v
    change inner ℝ (T u) v = inner ℝ u (T v)
    rw [← M.inner_map_map (T u) v, ← M.inner_map_map u (T v)]
    rw [(hAll u).2.1, (hAll v).2.1]
    change inner ℝ (P (U (P (M u)))) (M v) =
      inner ℝ (M u) (P (U (P (M v))))
    rw [hPs, (hAll u).1, (hAll v).1]
    calc
      inner ℝ (U (M u)) (M v) = inner ℝ (M u) (U (M v)) :=
        hUs.isSymmetric (M u) (M v)
      _ = inner ℝ (M u) (P (U (M v))) := by
        rw [← hPs, (hAll u).1]
  have hcompS : ν ⊗ₘ S = Λ := by
    calc
      ν ⊗ₘ S = Λ.fst ⊗ₘ S := congrArg (fun ρ => ρ ⊗ₘ S) hSf.symm
      _ = Λ := Measure.disintegrate Λ S
  have hPreserve (u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) : (∫ y, T u y ∂ν)=∫ y, u y ∂ν := by
    have hi : Integrable (fun p : E × E => u p.2) (ν ⊗ₘ S) := by
      rw [hcompS]
      exact ((Lp.memLp u).comp_measurePreserving
        (show MeasurePreserving (Prod.snd : E × E → E) Λ ν from
          ⟨measurable_snd,hSs⟩)).integrable (by norm_num)
    rw [integral_congr_ae (hAll u).2.2.2.1, ← Measure.integral_compProd hi, hcompS]
    calc
      (∫ p : E × E, u p.2 ∂Λ) = ∫ y, u y ∂Λ.snd :=
        (integral_map (μ:=Λ) measurable_snd.aemeasurable
          (Lp.stronglyMeasurable u).aestronglyMeasurable).symm
      _ = ∫ y, u y ∂ν := by rw [hSs]
  let q : Lp ℝ 2 ν := AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.L2Expectation.one ν
  have hq (u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) : inner ℝ q u = ∫ y, u y ∂ν :=
    AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.L2Expectation.inner_one_eq_integral ν u
  have hTq : T q=q := by
    apply ext_inner_right ℝ
    intro u
    calc
      inner ℝ (T q) u = inner ℝ q (T u) := hTs.isSymmetric q u
      _ = ∫ y, T u y ∂ν := hq _
      _ = ∫ y, u y ∂ν := hPreserve u
      _ = inner ℝ q u := (hq _).symm
  let H0 : Submodule ℝ (Lp ℝ 2 ν) := (innerSL ℝ q).ker
  have hH0 (u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) : u ∈ H0 ↔ (∫ y, u y ∂ν)=0 := by
    change inner ℝ q u = 0 ↔ _
    rw [hq]
  have hInv (u : H0) : T u ∈ H0 :=
    (hH0 _).mpr ((hPreserve u).trans ((hH0 _).mp u.property))
  let T0 : H0 →L[ℝ] H0 := (T.comp H0.subtypeL).codRestrict H0 hInv
  have hT0 (u : H0) : (T0 u : Lp ℝ 2 ν)=T u := rfl
  have hT0s : IsSelfAdjoint T0 := by
    apply ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric.mpr
    intro u v
    exact hTs.isSymmetric (u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) (v : Lp ℝ 2 ν)
  have hTn (u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) : ‖T u‖ ≤ ‖u‖ := (hAll u).2.2.1
  have hT0n (u : H0) : ‖T0 u‖ ≤ ‖u‖ := hTn u
  have hDef (u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) : inner ℝ (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) u) u = ‖u‖^2-‖T u‖^2 := by
    simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.sub_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply,
      ContinuousLinearMap.mul_apply, inner_sub_left]
    have hs : inner ℝ (T (T u)) u = inner ℝ (T u) (T u) := hTs.isSymmetric (T u) u
    rw [hs, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq]
  have hD : ((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T).IsPositive := by
    apply (ContinuousLinearMap.isPositive_iff' _).mpr
    refine ⟨((IsSelfAdjoint.one (Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)).sub (by simpa only [pow_two] using hTs.pow 2)),?_⟩
    intro u
    rw [hDef]
    exact sub_nonneg.mpr ((sq_le_sq₀ (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)).mpr (hTn u))
  have hDef0 (u : H0) : inner ℝ (((1 : H0 →L[ℝ] H0)-T0*T0) u) u = ‖u‖^2-‖T0 u‖^2 := by
    simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.sub_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply,
      ContinuousLinearMap.mul_apply, inner_sub_left]
    have hs : inner ℝ (T0 (T0 u)) u = inner ℝ (T0 u) (T0 u) := hT0s.isSymmetric (T0 u) u
    rw [hs, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq]
  have hD0 : ((1 : H0 →L[ℝ] H0)-T0*T0).IsPositive := by
    apply (ContinuousLinearMap.isPositive_iff' _).mpr
    refine ⟨(IsSelfAdjoint.one (H0 →L[ℝ] H0)).sub (by simpa only [pow_two] using hT0s.pow 2),?_⟩
    intro u
    rw [hDef0]
    exact sub_nonneg.mpr ((sq_le_sq₀ (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)).mpr (hT0n u))
  have hqa : (q : E → ℝ) =ᵐ[ν] (fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) :=
    Lp.coeFn_const (α:=E) (μ:=ν) (p:=(2 : ℝ≥0∞)) (c:=(1 : ℝ))
  refine ⟨hμ,hJ,hν,S,hS,hSd,hSc,hSf,hSs,U,hU,hUi,hUs,M,hM,T,hTs,?_,
    q,hqa,hTq,hq,?_⟩
  · intro u
    exact ⟨(hAll u).1,(hAll u).2.1,hTn u,(hAll u).2.2.2.1,hPreserve u⟩
  · refine ⟨hH0,hD,?_,hDef,T0,hT0,hT0s,hT0n,hD0,?_,hDef0⟩
    · simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.sub_apply,ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply,
        ContinuousLinearMap.mul_apply,hTq,sub_self]
    · intro u
      rfl

end
end AutoSamplingTheory.ExampleCases.ProximalBPS.CenteredDefectOperator

#print axioms AutoSamplingTheory.ExampleCases.ProximalBPS.CenteredDefectOperator.actual_centered_selfadjoint_defect

Proof architecture

Actual PBPS consumer; no SALD admission

Lean proof walkthrough

  • Read the quantified variables and typeclass brackets as part of the mathematical statement; inferred arguments are not missing assumptions.
  • `intro` introduces quantified hypotheses into the local proof context.
  • `have` creates a named intermediate mathematical fact.
  • `calc` records an equality or inequality chain matching a paper calculation.
  • `rw` rewrites by an established identity.
  • `simp` normalizes through registered definitional and theorem rewrites.
  • `apply` reduces the goal to the hypotheses of a reusable theorem.
  • `refine` instantiates a reusable theorem while leaving explicit subgoals.

Why the statement has this shape

The declaration is kept at the reusable level recorded by its Registry tags and direct consumers. Explicit measures, spaces, wrappers, and regularity hypotheses expose interfaces that paper notation often infers. A theorem card explains those interfaces but never widens the compiled statement.

Hidden assumptions and non-claims

  • Measurability is represented explicitly or must be supplied by a dependency.
  • Integrability is an input or proved output; a displayed integral alone does not supply it.
  • Totalized `fderiv` values must not be read as a differentiability theorem.
  • Almost-everywhere hypotheses depend on the stated measure and representative.
Common pitfall. A wrapper or display identity is not a new analytic theorem merely because it has its own Lean name. Check the statement, hypotheses, and downstream consumers before interpreting its mathematical contribution.