actual_centered_polar_isometry

Plain-English statement

Independently exact-science65 VERIFIED ecd9d1f10ad0241312492cefacd5fe48c317e9c2. Original C2/two Hessians/positive capped eta produce SAME actual laws/e/U/T/root/centered inverse. Exact B0:HP0->kerP and V0=B0 Inv satisfy B0=V0 Gamma0,V0.adjoint composed V0=I and all-vector norm equality. Genuine original-input Test gives B0.adjoint=Gamma0 V0.adjoint, adjoint contraction and residual annihilation. No onto/reverse product. Rank0/alphaeta1 retained. B21 root commutation/rotation, B17/H1/operator inequalities,dynamics/main/errors/expected costs/composition remain open.

Scope guard. This card records a compiled local declaration. Its mathematical scope is exactly the Lean statement below; the Registry note and source correspondence may describe motivation but do not strengthen it.

Lean learning studio · mathematics → formal proof

Read the mathematics first, then descend into Lean

You do not need to know Lean before opening this panel. The page keeps the paper-level theorem, rigorous proof obligations, exact Lean declaration, and proof dependencies as separate layers so a first-time reader can move down one layer at a time.

BeginnerWhy this theorem exists → intuition → statement → one hand calculation. Hide proof-engineering detail.

RigorousExpose assumptions, hidden measure/limit/domain issues, proof route, and rigorous references.

Lean learnerOpen the exact declaration, proof tree/network, syntax glossary, and line-by-line explanation.

Proof architecture

Start with the tree when learning: prerequisites sit below the theorem and downstream results sit above it. Switch to the network when you want to understand where this declaration lives in the local formal library. Every mapped node is clickable.

Loading source-derived dependency evidence…

Graph rule: only dependencies found by the ASTIS source scan are drawn. Missing tactic indirection is treated as an under-approximation; the site never invents an edge just to make a prettier graph.

How to read the exact Lean declaration

Read a Lean theorem left-to-right exactly as you would unpack a mathematical sentence: name → ambient types → automatically inferred structures → explicit hypotheses → conclusion → proof. Then read the proof top-to-bottom as transformations of the current goal.

NameWhat reusable mathematical fact is being created?
ParametersWhich symbols are arbitrary, and which structures are inferred by typeclass search?
PropositionAfter the colon, translate the Lean expression back into a paper statement.
Proof actionsAfter by, ask what each tactic does to the mathematical goal—not only what syntax it uses.

Syntax used on this page

This glossary is filtered to syntax that actually occurs in the declaration above. Open a symbol only when you meet it, rather than memorizing Lean grammar in advance.

Source voice and ASTIS voice stay separate

When Samplinglib shows a short quotation from Chewi, it is labeled as a source excerpt and linked to the canonical book page. Intuition, expanded proof steps, hidden regularity assumptions, and Lean explanations are ASTIS-authored commentary. A quotation never substitutes for a formal proof, and an ASTIS explanation is never attributed to the textbook author.

Lean statement

theorem actual_centered_polar_isometry
    {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
    [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
    {V : E → ℝ} {α β : ℝ≥0} {η : ℝ}
    (hα : 0 < (α : ℝ)) (hαβ : α ≤ β) (hV : ContDiff ℝ 2 V)
    (hH : ∀ x v : E,
      (α : ℝ)*‖v‖^2 ≤ (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ∧
      (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ≤ (β : ℝ)*‖v‖^2)
    (hη : 0 < η) (hβη : (β : ℝ)*η ≤ 1) :
    let μ := (volume : Measure E).tilted (fun x => -V x)
    let J := (μ.prod (stdGaussian E)).map
      (fun p : E × E => (p.1,p.1+Real.sqrt η • p.2))
    let ν := J.snd
    let Λ := J.map (fun p : E × E => (p.2,(2 : ℝ) • p.1-p.2))
    let F := fun p : E × E => (p.1,(2 : ℝ) • p.1-p.2)
    let mY := MeasurableSpace.comap Prod.snd (inferInstance : MeasurableSpace E)
    letI : MeasurableSpace (E × E) := Prod.instMeasurableSpace
    letI : Fact (mY ≤ (inferInstance : MeasurableSpace (E × E))) :=
      ⟨measurable_snd.comap_le⟩
    let HP := lpMeas ℝ ℝ mY 2 J
    let P : Lp ℝ 2 J →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 J :=
      HP.subtypeL ∘L condExpL2 ℝ ℝ (μ := J) measurable_snd.comap_le
    let hp : MeasurePreserving (Prod.snd : E × E → E) J ν := ⟨measurable_snd,rfl⟩
    let M : Lp ℝ 2 ν →ₗᵢ[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 J := Lp.compMeasurePreservingₗᵢ ℝ Prod.snd hp
    IsProbabilityMeasure μ ∧ IsProbabilityMeasure J ∧ IsProbabilityMeasure ν ∧
    HP = P.toLinearMap.range ∧
    (∀ f : HP, P (f : Lp ℝ 2 J) = f) ∧
    ∃ S : Kernel E E, IsMarkovKernel S ∧
      (∀ y, S y = (volume : Measure E).tilted
        (fun x => -V ((1/2 : ℝ) • (y+x)) - ‖y-x‖^2/(8*η))) ∧
      Λ.IsCondKernel S ∧ Λ.fst = ν ∧ Λ.snd = ν ∧
      ∃ e : Lp ℝ 2 ν ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] HP,
        (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, (e u : Lp ℝ 2 J) = M u) ∧
        ∃ U : Lp ℝ 2 J →ₗᵢ[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 J,
          (∀ g : Lp ℝ 2 J, (U g : E × E → ℝ) =ᵐ[J] g ∘ F) ∧
          Function.Involutive U ∧ IsSelfAdjoint U.toContinuousLinearMap ∧
          ∃ T : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν,
            IsSelfAdjoint T ∧
            (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν,
              ‖T u‖ ≤ ‖u‖ ∧
              (T u : E → ℝ) =ᵐ[ν] (fun y => ∫ x, u x ∂S y) ∧
              (∫ y, T u y ∂ν) = ∫ y, u y ∂ν) ∧
            let A : HP →L[ℝ] HP :=
              HP.orthogonalProjectionOnto ∘L U.toContinuousLinearMap ∘L HP.subtypeL
            let B : HP →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 J :=
              (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 J →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 J)-P)*U.toContinuousLinearMap*P) ∘L HP.subtypeL
            A = e.conjStarAlgEquiv T ∧ IsSelfAdjoint A ∧
            (∀ f : HP, ‖A f‖ ≤ ‖f‖) ∧
            (∀ f : HP, P (B f) = 0) ∧
            ∃ Γ : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν,
              Γ.IsPositive ∧ Γ*Γ=(1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T ∧
              let ΓP : HP →L[ℝ] HP := e.conjStarAlgEquiv Γ
              ΓP.IsPositive ∧ ΓP*ΓP=(1 : HP →L[ℝ] HP)-A*A ∧
              B.adjoint ∘L B = ΓP*ΓP ∧
              ∃ q : Lp ℝ 2 ν,
                (q : E → ℝ) =ᵐ[ν] (fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) ∧ T q = q ∧
                (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, inner ℝ q u = ∫ y, u y ∂ν) ∧
                let qP : HP := e q
                let HP0 := (innerSL ℝ qP).ker
                letI : NormedAddCommGroup HP0 := HP0.normedAddCommGroup
                letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ HP0 := HP0.innerProductSpace
                letI : CompleteSpace HP0 := (innerSL ℝ qP).isClosed_ker.completeSpace_coe
                let γ : ℝ := 2*Real.sqrt ((α : ℝ)*η)/(1+(α : ℝ)*η)
                (∀ f : HP, f ∈ HP0 ↔ (∫ y, (e.symm f) y ∂ν) = 0) ∧
                ΓP qP = 0 ∧ 0 < γ ∧
                ∃ ΓP0 : HP0 →L[ℝ] HP0,
                  (∀ f : HP0, (ΓP0 f : HP) = ΓP (f : HP)) ∧
                  ΓP0.IsPositive ∧ (ΓP0-γ • (1 : HP0 →L[ℝ] HP0)).IsPositive ∧
                  IsUnit ΓP0 ∧
                  ∃ Inv : HP0 →L[ℝ] HP0,
                    Inv*ΓP0=(1 : HP0 →L[ℝ] HP0) ∧
                    ΓP0*Inv=(1 : HP0 →L[ℝ] HP0) ∧ ‖Inv‖ ≤ 1/γ ∧
                    let Hperp := P.ker
                    letI : NormedAddCommGroup Hperp := Hperp.normedAddCommGroup
                    letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ Hperp := Hperp.innerProductSpace
                    letI : CompleteSpace Hperp := P.isClosed_ker.completeSpace_coe
                    ∃ B0 : HP0 →L[ℝ] Hperp,
                      (∀ f : HP0, (B0 f : Lp ℝ 2 J) = B (f : HP)) ∧
                      ∃ V0 : HP0 →L[ℝ] Hperp,
                        V0 = B0 ∘L Inv ∧ B0 = V0 ∘L ΓP0 ∧
                        V0.adjoint ∘L V0 = (1 : HP0 →L[ℝ] HP0) ∧
                        (∀ f : HP0, ‖V0 f‖ = ‖f‖) := by
  classical
  dsimp only
  let μ := (volume : Measure E).tilted (fun x => -V x)
  let J := (μ.prod (stdGaussian E)).map
    (fun p : E × E => (p.1,p.1+Real.sqrt η • p.2))
  let ν := J.snd
  let mY : MeasurableSpace (E × E) := MeasurableSpace.comap Prod.snd (inferInstance : MeasurableSpace E)
  letI : MeasurableSpace (E × E) := Prod.instMeasurableSpace
  letI : Fact (mY ≤ (inferInstance : MeasurableSpace (E × E))) := ⟨measurable_snd.comap_le⟩
  let HP := lpMeas ℝ ℝ mY 2 J
  letI : NormedAddCommGroup HP := HP.normedAddCommGroup
  letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ HP := HP.innerProductSpace
  let P : Lp ℝ 2 J →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 J :=
    HP.subtypeL ∘L condExpL2 ℝ ℝ (μ := J) measurable_snd.comap_le
  have hBase := AutoSamplingTheory.ExampleCases.ProximalBPS.CenteredRootOrderInverse.actual_centered_root_order_inverse
    (E:=E) (V:=V) (α:=α) (β:=β) (η:=η) hα hαβ hV hH hη hβη
  dsimp only at hBase
  rcases hBase with
    ⟨hμ,hJ,hν,hRange,hPf,S,hS,hSd,hSc,hSf,hSs,e,he,U,hU,hUi,hUs,
      T,hTs,hAll,hAeq,hAs,hAn,hPB,Γ,hΓ,hΓSq,hΓP,hΓPSq,hGram,
      q,hqa,hTq,hq,hCenter,hΓPq,hγ,ΓP0,hΓP0,hPos0,hOrder0,hUnit,
      Inv,hLeft,hRight,hNormInv⟩
  let A : HP →L[ℝ] HP := HP.orthogonalProjectionOnto ∘L U.toContinuousLinearMap ∘L HP.subtypeL
  let B : HP →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 J :=
    (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 J →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 J)-P)*U.toContinuousLinearMap*P) ∘L HP.subtypeL
  let ΓP : HP →L[ℝ] HP := e.conjStarAlgEquiv Γ
  let qP : HP := e q
  let HP0 := (innerSL ℝ qP).ker
  letI : NormedAddCommGroup HP0 := HP0.normedAddCommGroup
  letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ HP0 := HP0.innerProductSpace
  letI : CompleteSpace HP0 := (innerSL ℝ qP).isClosed_ker.completeSpace_coe
  let Hperp := P.ker
  letI : NormedAddCommGroup Hperp := Hperp.normedAddCommGroup
  letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ Hperp := Hperp.innerProductSpace
  letI : CompleteSpace Hperp := P.isClosed_ker.completeSpace_coe
  let B0 : HP0 →L[ℝ] Hperp :=
    (B ∘L HP0.subtypeL).codRestrict Hperp (by intro f; exact hPB (f : HP))
  have hB0 (f : HP0) : (B0 f : Lp ℝ 2 J)=B (f : HP) := rfl
  let V0 : HP0 →L[ℝ] Hperp := B0 ∘L Inv
  have hGramLocal : B.adjoint ∘L B=ΓP*ΓP := hGram
  have hPosLocal : ΓP.IsPositive := hΓP
  have hVnorm (f : HP0) : ‖V0 f‖=‖f‖ := by
    let g : HP0 := Inv f
    have hg : ΓP0 g=f := congrArg (fun C : HP0 →L[ℝ] HP0 => C f) hRight
    have hb := B.apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_right (g : HP)
    have hr := ΓP.apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_right (g : HP)
    rw [hGramLocal] at hb
    rw [hPosLocal.isSelfAdjoint.adjoint_eq] at hr
    have hNorm : ‖B (g : HP)‖=‖ΓP (g : HP)‖ :=
      (sq_eq_sq₀ (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)).mp (hb.trans hr.symm)
    calc
      ‖V0 f‖=‖B (g : HP)‖ := rfl
      _ = ‖ΓP (g : HP)‖ := hNorm
      _ = ‖ΓP0 g‖ := congrArg (fun z : HP => ‖z‖) (hΓP0 g).symm
      _ = ‖f‖ := congrArg (fun z : HP0 => ‖z‖) hg
  have hFactor : B0=V0 ∘L ΓP0 := by
    apply ContinuousLinearMap.ext
    intro f
    change B0 f=B0 (Inv (ΓP0 f))
    have hf : Inv (ΓP0 f)=f := congrArg (fun C : HP0 →L[ℝ] HP0 => C f) hLeft
    rw [hf]
  have hVadj : V0.adjoint ∘L V0=(1 : HP0 →L[ℝ] HP0) :=
    (ContinuousLinearMap.norm_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self V0).mp hVnorm
  exact ⟨hμ,hJ,hν,hRange,hPf,S,hS,hSd,hSc,hSf,hSs,e,he,U,hU,hUi,hUs,T,hTs,hAll,
    hAeq,hAs,hAn,hPB,Γ,hΓ,hΓSq,hΓP,hΓPSq,hGram,q,hqa,hTq,hq,hCenter,hΓPq,hγ,
    ΓP0,hΓP0,hPos0,hOrder0,hUnit,Inv,hLeft,hRight,hNormInv,B0,hB0,V0,rfl,
    hFactor,hVadj,hVnorm⟩

end
end AutoSamplingTheory.ExampleCases.ProximalBPS.PolarIsometry

Open AutoSamplingTheory/ExampleCases/ProximalBPS/PolarIsometry.lean:10published source at ed709a7f320d

Proof architecture

Actual PBPS consumer; no SALD admission

Lean proof walkthrough

Read the quantified variables and typeclass brackets as part of the mathematical statement; inferred arguments are not missing assumptions.
`intro` introduces quantified hypotheses into the local proof context.
`have` creates a named intermediate mathematical fact.
`calc` records an equality or inequality chain matching a paper calculation.
`rw` rewrites by an established identity.
`apply` reduces the goal to the hypotheses of a reusable theorem.
`exact` closes the current goal with an already typed term.

Why the statement has this shape

The declaration is kept at the reusable level recorded by its Registry tags and direct consumers. Explicit measures, spaces, wrappers, and regularity hypotheses expose interfaces that paper notation often infers. A theorem card explains those interfaces but never widens the compiled statement.

Hidden assumptions and non-claims

Measurability is represented explicitly or must be supplied by a dependency.
Totalized `fderiv` values must not be read as a differentiability theorem.
Almost-everywhere hypotheses depend on the stated measure and representative.