Plain-English statement
SAME Gibbs/Gaussian mu/J/nu and literal S give one genuine dense closable compact-gradient G and bounded T/K BEFOREallrough L2 inputs. Actual closed graph membership, sharp c=(1-alpha*eta)²/[4(1+alpha*eta)] and source4eta norm defects hold; AE source mean/fiber integrability only. Original C2/two Hessian/capped eta retained; finite Hilbert/Borel/rank0 extension disclosed. Three actual admitted parents, no private/background copy or caller law/domain/convergence premise. Actual SAME-T joint BMu rough-difference and alphaeta1 full K=0 consumers tested. Separate weak-H1/full B13/Gamma/dynamics/main/errors/cost/composition open. Independently verified db2c1237cd56698ae560a8121abfcbf374ff8838.
Read the mathematics first, then descend into Lean
You do not need to know Lean before opening this panel. The page keeps the paper-level theorem, rigorous proof obligations, exact Lean declaration, and proof dependencies as separate layers so a first-time reader can move down one layer at a time.
Proof architecture
Start with the tree when learning: prerequisites sit below the theorem and downstream results sit above it. Switch to the network when you want to understand where this declaration lives in the local formal library. Every mapped node is clickable.
Graph rule: only dependencies found by the ASTIS source scan are drawn. Missing tactic indirection is treated as an under-approximation; the site never invents an edge just to make a prettier graph.
How to read the exact Lean declaration
Read a Lean theorem left-to-right exactly as you would unpack a mathematical sentence: name → ambient types → automatically inferred structures → explicit hypotheses → conclusion → proof. Then read the proof top-to-bottom as transformations of the current goal.
- NameWhat reusable mathematical fact is being created?
- ParametersWhich symbols are arbitrary, and which structures are inferred by typeclass search?
- PropositionAfter the colon, translate the Lean expression back into a paper statement.
- Proof actionsAfter
by, ask what each tactic does to the mathematical goal—not only what syntax it uses.
Syntax used on this page
This glossary is filtered to syntax that actually occurs in the declaration above. Open a symbol only when you meet it, rather than memorizing Lean grammar in advance.
Source voice and ASTIS voice stay separate
When Samplinglib shows a short quotation from Chewi, it is labeled as a source excerpt and linked to the canonical book page. Intuition, expanded proof steps, hidden regularity assumptions, and Lean explanations are ASTIS-authored commentary. A quotation never substitutes for a formal proof, and an ASTIS explanation is never attributed to the textbook author.
Lean statement
theorem actual_rough_mean_gradient
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
{V : E → ℝ} {α β : ℝ≥0} {η : ℝ}
(hα : 0 < (α : ℝ)) (hαβ : α ≤ β) (hV : ContDiff ℝ 2 V)
(hH : ∀ x v : E,
(α : ℝ)*‖v‖^2 ≤ (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ∧
(fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ≤ (β : ℝ)*‖v‖^2)
(hη : 0 < η) (hβη : (β : ℝ)*η ≤ 1) :
let μ := (volume : Measure E).tilted (fun x => -V x)
let J := (μ.prod (stdGaussian E)).map
(fun p : E × E => (p.1,p.1+Real.sqrt η • p.2))
let ν := J.snd
let S := fun y : E => (volume : Measure E).tilted
(fun x => -V ((1/2 : ℝ) • (y+x)) - ‖y-x‖^2/(8*η))
IsProbabilityMeasure ν ∧
∃ G : Lp ℝ 2 ν →ₗ.[ℝ] Lp E 2 ν,
Dense (G.domain : Set (Lp ℝ 2 ν)) ∧ G.IsClosable ∧ G.closure.IsClosed ∧
(∀ (u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) (v : Lp E 2 ν), (u,v) ∈ G.graph ↔
∃ φ : E → ℝ, ContDiff ℝ ∞ φ ∧ HasCompactSupport φ ∧
u =ᵐ[ν] φ ∧ v =ᵐ[ν] gradient φ) ∧
∃ T : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν,
∃ K : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp E 2 ν,
∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν,
(T u,K u) ∈ G.closure.graph ∧ ‖T u‖ ≤ ‖u‖ ∧
(T u : E → ℝ) =ᵐ[ν] (fun y => ∫ x, u x ∂S y) ∧
(∀ᵐ y ∂ν, Integrable (u : E → ℝ) (S y) ∧
Integrable (fun x => (u x)^2) (S y)) ∧
η*‖K u‖^2 ≤
(1-(α : ℝ)*η)^2/(4*(1+(α : ℝ)*η)) * (‖u‖^2-‖T u‖^2) ∧
4*η*‖K u‖^2 ≤ ‖u‖^2-‖T u‖^2 := by
classical
dsimp only
let μ := (volume : Measure E).tilted (fun x => -V x)
let J := (μ.prod (stdGaussian E)).map
(fun p : E × E => (p.1,p.1+Real.sqrt η • p.2))
let ν := J.snd
let S := fun y : E => (volume : Measure E).tilted
(fun x => -V ((1/2 : ℝ) • (y+x)) - ‖y-x‖^2/(8*η))
let c := (1-(α : ℝ)*η)^2/(4*(1+(α : ℝ)*η))
obtain ⟨hμ,hJ,hν,S₀,hS₀,hSd,hSc,hSf,hSs,U,hU,hUi,hUs,M,hM,T,hAll⟩ :=
L2MacroscopicMean.actual_macroscopic_l2_mean hα hαβ hV hH hη hβη
let : IsProbabilityMeasure μ := hμ
let : IsProbabilityMeasure J := hJ
let : IsProbabilityMeasure ν := hν
let : IsMarkovKernel S₀ := hS₀
let Λ := J.map (fun p : E × E => (p.2,(2 : ℝ) • p.1-p.2))
let : Λ.IsCondKernel S₀ := hSc
have hstation : S₀ ∘ₘ ν = ν := by
rw [← Measure.snd_compProd]
have hc : ν ⊗ₘ S₀ = Λ := by
have hfirst : Λ.fst = ν := hSf
rw [← hfirst]
exact Measure.disintegrate Λ S₀
rw [hc]
exact hSs
obtain ⟨_,G,hDense,hClose,hClosed,hGraph,hMean⟩ :=
SourceMeanGradientDomain.literal_source_mean_in_closed_gradient hα hαβ hV hH hη hβη
obtain ⟨_,_,_,R₁,S₁,hR₁,hS₁,hRc₁,hSr₁,hSd₁,hSc₁,hSf₁,
U₁,hU₁,hUi₁,hUs₁,hBB₁,hBD₁,hBlock₁,hEnergy⟩ :=
MacroscopicEnergy.actual_macroscopic_gradient_energy_blocks hα hαβ hV hH hη hβη
have hn (u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) : ‖u‖^2 = ∫ y, (u y)^2 ∂ν := by
rw [← real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, L2.inner_def]
simp only [real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq,Real.norm_eq_abs,sq_abs]
have hnE (v : Lp E 2 ν) : ‖v‖^2 = ∫ y, ‖v y‖^2 ∂ν := by
rw [← real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq,L2.inner_def]
simp only [real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq]
have hFiberEq (u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) (f : E → ℝ) (hf : u =ᵐ[ν] f) :
∀ᵐ y ∂ν, (u : E → ℝ) =ᵐ[S₀ y] f := by
have hcomp : (u : E → ℝ) =ᵐ[S₀ ∘ₘ ν] f := by rw [hstation]; exact hf
exact Measure.ae_ae_of_ae_comp hcomp
have hCore (u : G.domain) :
∃ v : Lp E 2 ν, (T u,v) ∈ G.closure.graph ∧
η*‖v‖^2 ≤ c*(‖(u : Lp ℝ 2 ν)‖^2-‖T u‖^2) := by
obtain ⟨f,hf,hfc,huf,_⟩ := (hGraph u (G u)).mp (G.mem_graph u)
let Tf := fun y : E => ∫ x, f x ∂S y
obtain ⟨hTf,hGrad,hPair⟩ := hMean f hf hfc
obtain ⟨_,_,hTn,hSource,hFib,_,_,_⟩ := hAll u
have hTu : T u = hTf.toLp Tf := by
apply Lp.ext
filter_upwards [hSource,hFiberEq u f huf,hTf.coeFn_toLp] with y hy heq ht
exact hy.trans ((integral_congr_ae heq).trans
((congrArg (fun m : Measure E => ∫ x, f x ∂m) (hSd y)).trans ht.symm))
obtain ⟨_,_,_,_,_,g,hg,hPg,hAg,hgn,hAgn,hvb,hSharp⟩ := hEnergy f hf hfc
have hSame : (fun y : E => ∫ x, f x ∂S₁ y) = Tf := by
funext y
exact congrArg (fun m : Measure E => ∫ x, f x ∂m) (hSd₁ y)
have hUn : ‖(u : Lp ℝ 2 ν)‖^2 = ∫ y, (f y)^2 ∂ν := by
rw [hn]
exact integral_congr_ae (Filter.EventuallyEq.fun_comp huf (fun t : ℝ => t^2))
have hTn' : ‖T u‖^2 = ∫ y, (Tf y)^2 ∂ν := by
rw [hTu,hn]
exact integral_congr_ae (Filter.EventuallyEq.fun_comp hTf.coeFn_toLp (fun t : ℝ => t^2))
have hGradn : ‖hGrad.toLp (gradient Tf)‖^2 = ∫ y, ‖gradient Tf y‖^2 ∂ν := by
rw [hnE]
exact integral_congr_ae (Filter.EventuallyEq.fun_comp hGrad.coeFn_toLp (fun t : E => ‖t‖^2))
have hDef := hBlock₁ g hPg
rw [hDef,hgn,hAgn] at hSharp
rw [hSame] at hSharp
refine ⟨hGrad.toLp (gradient Tf),?_,?_⟩
· rw [hTu]
exact hPair
· rw [hGradn,hUn,hTn']
exact hSharp
have hDom (u : G.domain) : T u ∈ G.closure.domain :=
G.closure.mem_domain_of_mem_graph (hCore u).choose_spec.1
let q : G.domain →ₗ[ℝ] G.closure.domain :=
(T.toLinearMap.comp G.domain.subtype).codRestrict G.closure.domain hDom
let D : G.domain →ₗ[ℝ] Lp E 2 ν := G.closure.toFun.comp q
have hDpair (u : G.domain) : (T u,D u) ∈ G.closure.graph :=
G.closure.mem_graph (q u)
have hDsharp (u : G.domain) :
η*‖D u‖^2 ≤ c*(‖(u : Lp ℝ 2 ν)‖^2-‖T u‖^2) := by
obtain ⟨v,hv,hvSharp⟩ := hCore u
have hDv : D u = v := G.closure.mem_graph_snd_inj (hDpair u) hv rfl
rw [hDv]
exact hvSharp
have hc : 0 ≤ c := div_nonneg (sq_nonneg _) (by positivity)
have hNormBound (u : G.domain) : ‖D u‖ ≤ Real.sqrt (c/η)*‖(u : Lp ℝ 2 ν)‖ := by
have hSq : ‖D u‖^2 ≤ (c/η)*‖(u : Lp ℝ 2 ν)‖^2 := by
calc
‖D u‖^2 ≤ (c*‖(u : Lp ℝ 2 ν)‖^2)/η := (le_div_iff₀ hη).mpr (by
have he := hDsharp u
have he' := mul_nonneg hc (sq_nonneg ‖T u‖)
nlinarith)
_ = (c/η)*‖(u : Lp ℝ 2 ν)‖^2 := by ring
apply (sq_le_sq₀ (norm_nonneg _) (mul_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _))).mp
rw [mul_pow,Real.sq_sqrt (div_nonneg hc hη.le)]
exact hSq
have hRange : DenseRange (G.domain.subtype : G.domain →ₗ[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν) := by
change Dense (Set.range (Subtype.val : G.domain → Lp ℝ 2 ν))
have hr : Set.range (Subtype.val : G.domain → Lp ℝ 2 ν) =
(G.domain : Set (Lp ℝ 2 ν)) := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨v,rfl⟩
exact v.property
· intro hx
exact ⟨⟨x,hx⟩,rfl⟩
rw [hr]
exact hDense
let K : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp E 2 ν := D.extendOfNorm G.domain.subtype
have hKcore (u : G.domain) : K u = D u :=
LinearMap.extendOfNorm_eq hRange ⟨Real.sqrt (c/η),hNormBound⟩ u
have hPairAll (u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) : (T u,K u) ∈ G.closure.graph := by
exact hDense.induction (P := fun v => (T v,K v) ∈ G.closure.graph)
(fun v hv => by rw [hKcore ⟨v,hv⟩]; exact hDpair ⟨v,hv⟩)
(hClosed.preimage (T.continuous.prodMk K.continuous)) u
have hSharpAll (u : Lp ℝ 2 ν) :
η*‖K u‖^2 ≤ c*(‖u‖^2-‖T u‖^2) := by
exact hDense.induction (P := fun v => η*‖K v‖^2 ≤ c*(‖v‖^2-‖T v‖^2))
(fun v hv => by rw [hKcore ⟨v,hv⟩]; exact hDsharp ⟨v,hv⟩)
(isClosed_le (by fun_prop) (by fun_prop)) u
have haη : 0 ≤ (α : ℝ)*η := mul_nonneg hα.le hη.le
have haη1 : (α : ℝ)*η ≤ 1 := le_trans
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (show (α : ℝ) ≤ (β : ℝ) from by exact_mod_cast hαβ) hη.le) hβη
have hcCap : c ≤ 1/4 := by
dsimp only [c]
apply (div_le_iff₀ (by positivity : 0 < 4*(1+(α : ℝ)*η))).mpr
nlinarith [mul_nonneg haη (show 0 ≤ 1-(α : ℝ)*η by linarith)]
refine ⟨hν,G,hDense,hClose,hClosed,hGraph,T,K,?_⟩
intro u
obtain ⟨_,_,hTn,hSource,hFib,_,_,_⟩ := hAll u
have hNonneg : 0 ≤ ‖u‖^2-‖T u‖^2 := by
have hs := (sq_le_sq₀ (norm_nonneg (T u)) (norm_nonneg u)).mpr hTn
linarith
refine ⟨hPairAll u,hTn,?_,?_,hSharpAll u,?_⟩
· filter_upwards [hSource] with y hy
exact hy.trans (congrArg (fun m : Measure E => ∫ x, u x ∂m) (hSd y))
· filter_upwards [hFib] with y hy
simpa only [hSd y] using hy
· have hSharp := hSharpAll u
have hCap := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hcCap hNonneg
nlinarith
end
end AutoSamplingTheory.ExampleCases.ProximalBPS.RoughMeanGradient
Open AutoSamplingTheory/ExampleCases/ProximalBPS/RoughMeanGradient.lean:12published source at ed709a7f320d
Proof architecture
Source-specific PBPS integration; no SALD admission
Lean proof walkthrough
- Read the quantified variables and typeclass brackets as part of the mathematical statement; inferred arguments are not missing assumptions.
- `intro` introduces quantified hypotheses into the local proof context.
- `have` creates a named intermediate mathematical fact.
- `calc` records an equality or inequality chain matching a paper calculation.
- `rw` rewrites by an established identity.
- `simp` normalizes through registered definitional and theorem rewrites.
- `apply` reduces the goal to the hypotheses of a reusable theorem.
- `refine` instantiates a reusable theorem while leaving explicit subgoals.
Why the statement has this shape
The declaration is kept at the reusable level recorded by its Registry tags and direct consumers. Explicit measures, spaces, wrappers, and regularity hypotheses expose interfaces that paper notation often infers. A theorem card explains those interfaces but never widens the compiled statement.
Hidden assumptions and non-claims
- Measurability is represented explicitly or must be supplied by a dependency.
- Integrability is an input or proved output; a displayed integral alone does not supply it.
- Totalized `fderiv` values must not be read as a differentiability theorem.
- Pointwise support, topological support, and compact support retain distinct meanings.
- Almost-everywhere hypotheses depend on the stated measure and representative.
- A Gibbs expression is not automatically a probability law or an invariant law.