Plain-English statement
- At a local minimum of a continuous real function, the second derivative, when represented by `deriv (deriv f)`, cannot be negative. This complements Mathlib's sufficient strict second-derivative test with the necessary non-strict direction.
Read the mathematics first, then descend into Lean
You do not need to know Lean before opening this panel. The page keeps the paper-level theorem, rigorous proof obligations, exact Lean declaration, and proof dependencies as separate layers so a first-time reader can move down one layer at a time.
Proof architecture
Start with the tree when learning: prerequisites sit below the theorem and downstream results sit above it. Switch to the network when you want to understand where this declaration lives in the local formal library. Every mapped node is clickable.
Graph rule: only dependencies found by the ASTIS source scan are drawn. Missing tactic indirection is treated as an under-approximation; the site never invents an edge just to make a prettier graph.
How to read the exact Lean declaration
Read a Lean theorem left-to-right exactly as you would unpack a mathematical sentence: name → ambient types → automatically inferred structures → explicit hypotheses → conclusion → proof. Then read the proof top-to-bottom as transformations of the current goal.
- NameWhat reusable mathematical fact is being created?
- ParametersWhich symbols are arbitrary, and which structures are inferred by typeclass search?
- PropositionAfter the colon, translate the Lean expression back into a paper statement.
- Proof actionsAfter
by, ask what each tactic does to the mathematical goal—not only what syntax it uses.
Syntax used on this page
This glossary is filtered to syntax that actually occurs in the declaration above. Open a symbol only when you meet it, rather than memorizing Lean grammar in advance.
Source voice and ASTIS voice stay separate
When Samplinglib shows a short quotation from Chewi, it is labeled as a source excerpt and linked to the canonical book page. Intuition, expanded proof steps, hidden regularity assumptions, and Lean explanations are ASTIS-authored commentary. A quotation never substitutes for a formal proof, and an ASTIS explanation is never attributed to the textbook author.
Lean statement
theorem IsLocalMin.deriv_deriv_nonneg_of_continuousAt
{f : ℝ → ℝ} {x : ℝ} (hmin : IsLocalMin f x)
(hc : ContinuousAt f x) :
0 ≤ deriv (deriv f) x := by
by_contra hnonneg
have hneg : deriv (deriv f) x < 0 := lt_of_not_ge hnonneg
have hmax : IsLocalMax f x :=
isLocalMax_of_deriv_deriv_neg hneg hmin.deriv_eq_zero hc
have hconst : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun _ : ℝ => f x := by
filter_upwards [hmin, hmax] with y hymin hymax
exact le_antisymm hymax hymin
have hderiv : deriv f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun _ : ℝ => 0 := by
simpa using hconst.deriv
have hzero : deriv (deriv f) x = 0 := by
calc
deriv (deriv f) x = deriv (fun _ : ℝ => 0) x := hderiv.deriv_eq
_ = 0 := by simp
linarith
/-- At a local maximum of a continuous real function, the second derivative,
when represented by `deriv (deriv f)`, is nonpositive. -/
Open AutoSamplingTheory/TechnicalLemmas/Geometry/SphereSecondOrder.lean:24published source at ed709a7f320d
Proof architecture
Reusable second-order sign condition for optimization and maximum-principle arguments.
Lean proof walkthrough
- Read the quantified variables and typeclass brackets as part of the mathematical statement; inferred arguments are not missing assumptions.
- `have` creates a named intermediate mathematical fact.
- `calc` records an equality or inequality chain matching a paper calculation.
- `simp` normalizes through registered definitional and theorem rewrites.
- `exact` closes the current goal with an already typed term.
- `simpa` closes the goal after a controlled simplification of a typed result.
- `filter_upwards` moves an almost-everywhere or eventual statement into a pointwise local context.
Why the statement has this shape
The declaration is kept at the reusable level recorded by its Registry tags and direct consumers. Explicit measures, spaces, wrappers, and regularity hypotheses expose interfaces that paper notation often infers. A theorem card explains those interfaces but never widens the compiled statement.
Hidden assumptions and non-claims
- No additional hidden-contract keyword was inferred; the exact Lean hypotheses remain controlling.