Plain-English statement
Actual Bochner means controlled by the infimum of quadratic costs over all actual couplings, with cost finiteness and residual norm bounds produced. No optimizer or cost-minimizer assumption. Fresh independent source and compiler audits accepted. Final root/reader gates and postmerge purification remain separate; no whole-model or convergence credit.
Read the mathematics first, then descend into Lean
You do not need to know Lean before opening this panel. The page keeps the paper-level theorem, rigorous proof obligations, exact Lean declaration, and proof dependencies as separate layers so a first-time reader can move down one layer at a time.
Proof architecture
Start with the tree when learning: prerequisites sit below the theorem and downstream results sit above it. Switch to the network when you want to understand where this declaration lives in the local formal library. Every mapped node is clickable.
Graph rule: only dependencies found by the ASTIS source scan are drawn. Missing tactic indirection is treated as an under-approximation; the site never invents an edge just to make a prettier graph.
How to read the exact Lean declaration
Read a Lean theorem left-to-right exactly as you would unpack a mathematical sentence: name → ambient types → automatically inferred structures → explicit hypotheses → conclusion → proof. Then read the proof top-to-bottom as transformations of the current goal.
- NameWhat reusable mathematical fact is being created?
- ParametersWhich symbols are arbitrary, and which structures are inferred by typeclass search?
- PropositionAfter the colon, translate the Lean expression back into a paper statement.
- Proof actionsAfter
by, ask what each tactic does to the mathematical goal—not only what syntax it uses.
Syntax used on this page
This glossary is filtered to syntax that actually occurs in the declaration above. Open a symbol only when you meet it, rather than memorizing Lean grammar in advance.
Source voice and ASTIS voice stay separate
When Samplinglib shows a short quotation from Chewi, it is labeled as a source excerpt and linked to the canonical book page. Intuition, expanded proof steps, hidden regularity assumptions, and Lean explanations are ASTIS-authored commentary. A quotation never substitutes for a formal proof, and an ASTIS explanation is never attributed to the textbook author.
Lean statement
theorem bounded_bochner_mean_quadratic_transport_control
{U H : Type*} [MeasurableSpace U]
[NormedAddCommGroup H] [NormedSpace ℝ H] [CompleteSpace H]
(K : U → H) (hK : StronglyMeasurable K)
(B C L : ℝ) (hB : 0 ≤ B) (hC : 0 ≤ C) (hL : 0 ≤ L)
(hBound : ∀ u, ‖K u‖ ≤ B)
(c : U × U → ℝ) (hc : Measurable c)
(hc0 : ∀ z, 0 ≤ c z) (hcBound : ∀ z, c z ≤ C)
(hLip : ∀ u v, ‖K u-K v‖ ≤ L * c (u,v))
(μ ν : Measure U) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [IsProbabilityMeasure ν] :
let cost : U × U → ℝ≥0∞ := fun z => ENNReal.ofReal ((c z)^2)
let Q := AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.Transport.transportCost cost μ ν
let W := Q ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ)
Integrable K μ ∧ Integrable K ν ∧ Q ≠ ∞ ∧
‖(∫ u, K u ∂μ) - (∫ v, K v ∂ν)‖ ≤ L * W.toReal ∧
∀ y : H, ‖(∫ u, K u ∂μ)-y‖ ≤ B+‖y‖ ∧
‖(∫ v, K v ∂ν)-y‖ ≤ B+‖y‖ := by
dsimp only
let cost : U × U → ℝ≥0∞ := fun z => ENNReal.ofReal ((c z)^2)
let Q := AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.Transport.transportCost cost μ ν
have hQ : Q ≠ ∞ := actual_transport_cost_finite c C hC hc0 hcBound μ ν
have hμ : Integrable K μ := bounded_feature_integrable K hK B hBound μ
have hν : Integrable K ν := bounded_feature_integrable K hK B hBound ν
have hs (γ : Measure (U × U))
(hγ : AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.Transport.IsCoupling γ μ ν) :
‖(∫ u, K u ∂μ)-(∫ v, K v ∂ν)‖^2 ≤ L^2 * ∫ z, (c z)^2 ∂γ :=
actual_coupling_squared_mean_bound K hK B C L hC hL hBound c hc hc0 hcBound hLip μ ν γ hγ
refine ⟨hμ,hν,hQ,?_,?_⟩
· let A := ‖(∫ u, K u ∂μ)-(∫ v, K v ∂ν)‖
change A ≤ L * (Q ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ)).toReal
by_cases hL0 : L = 0
· have h := hs (μ.prod ν)
(AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.Transport.isCoupling_prod μ ν)
rw [hL0] at *
simp only [zero_mul,zero_pow (by decide : 2 ≠ 0)] at *
change A^2 ≤ 0 at h
nlinarith [norm_nonneg ((∫ u, K u ∂μ)-(∫ v, K v ∂ν))]
· have hLp : 0 < L := lt_of_le_of_ne hL (Ne.symm hL0)
have hLow : ENNReal.ofReal ((A/L)^2) ≤ Q := by
apply le_sInf
rintro q ⟨γ,hγ,rfl⟩
letI : IsProbabilityMeasure γ :=
AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.Transport.isProbabilityMeasure_of_isCoupling_left hγ
have hcLp : MemLp c 2 γ := (memLp_const C).mono' hc.aestronglyMeasurable
(ae_of_all _ fun z => by simpa only [Real.norm_of_nonneg (hc0 z)] using hcBound z)
have hcSq : Integrable (fun z => (c z)^2) γ := (memLp_two_iff_integrable_sq hcLp.1).1 hcLp
change ENNReal.ofReal ((A/L)^2) ≤ ∫⁻ z, ENNReal.ofReal ((c z)^2) ∂γ
rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal hcSq (ae_of_all _ fun z => sq_nonneg _)]
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal
rw [div_pow]
apply (div_le_iff₀ (sq_pos_of_pos hLp)).2
simpa only [mul_comm] using hs γ hγ
have hReal := ENNReal.toReal_mono hQ hLow
rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sq_nonneg _)] at hReal
have he : (Q ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ))^2 = Q := by
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_two,← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
norm_num
have heReal : ((Q ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ)).toReal)^2 = Q.toReal := by
rw [← ENNReal.toReal_pow,he]
have hr : A/L ≤ (Q ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ)).toReal := by
have ha : 0 ≤ A/L := div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) hL
have hb := ENNReal.toReal_nonneg (a := Q ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ))
nlinarith
calc
A = L * (A/L) := by field_simp
_ ≤ L * (Q ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ)).toReal := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hr hL
· have hmμ : ‖∫ u, K u ∂μ‖ ≤ B := by
simpa only [probReal_univ,mul_one] using
(norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const (μ := μ) (ae_of_all _ hBound))
have hmν : ‖∫ v, K v ∂ν‖ ≤ B := by
simpa only [probReal_univ,mul_one] using
(norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const (μ := ν) (ae_of_all _ hBound))
intro y
exact ⟨(norm_sub_le _ _).trans (add_le_add hmμ le_rfl),
(norm_sub_le _ _).trans (add_le_add hmν le_rfl)⟩
end AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.BochnerMeanTransport
Open AutoSamplingTheory/TechnicalLemmas/Measure/BochnerMeanTransport.lean:129published source at ed709a7f320d
Proof architecture
Generic probability, optimisation and sphere-feature prerequisites; concrete model compositions remain separate
Lean proof walkthrough
- Read the quantified variables and typeclass brackets as part of the mathematical statement; inferred arguments are not missing assumptions.
- `intro` introduces quantified hypotheses into the local proof context.
- `have` creates a named intermediate mathematical fact.
- `calc` records an equality or inequality chain matching a paper calculation.
- `rw` rewrites by an established identity.
- `simp` normalizes through registered definitional and theorem rewrites.
- `apply` reduces the goal to the hypotheses of a reusable theorem.
- `refine` instantiates a reusable theorem while leaving explicit subgoals.
Why the statement has this shape
The declaration is kept at the reusable level recorded by its Registry tags and direct consumers. Explicit measures, spaces, wrappers, and regularity hypotheses expose interfaces that paper notation often infers. A theorem card explains those interfaces but never widens the compiled statement.
Hidden assumptions and non-claims
- Measurability is represented explicitly or must be supplied by a dependency.
- Integrability is an input or proved output; a displayed integral alone does not supply it.
- Almost-everywhere hypotheses depend on the stated measure and representative.