Samplinglib
Lean gate not recorded for this source state main · ed709a7f320d
Registry leaf card · measure.positiveRealL2SquareRoot

exists_positive_real_square_root

compiled Samplinglib leaf Not mapped explicit smoke test

Independently exact-science61 verified bcd245d90b21b899acb9937fc54dffcea20e86ee. Arbitrary measure and bounded positive real D; actual complex CFC root, conjugated-root positivity and uniqueness establish pointwise conjugation preservation; full fixed-space descent produces bounded positive REAL Gamma, Gamma squared equals D and full-domain quadratic energy. No finite/probability measure, finite L2, nontriviality or caller CFC/root certificate. Exported real uniqueness, joint GammaP/ontoM/typed B*B, centered root order/inverse/polar, weakH1/dynamics/main/error/cost/composition remain open.

Plain-English statement

Independently exact-science61 verified bcd245d90b21b899acb9937fc54dffcea20e86ee. Arbitrary measure and bounded positive real D; actual complex CFC root, conjugated-root positivity and uniqueness establish pointwise conjugation preservation; full fixed-space descent produces bounded positive REAL Gamma, Gamma squared equals D and full-domain quadratic energy. No finite/probability measure, finite L2, nontriviality or caller CFC/root certificate. Exported real uniqueness, joint GammaP/ontoM/typed B*B, centered root order/inverse/polar, weakH1/dynamics/main/error/cost/composition remain open.

Scope guard. This card records a compiled local declaration. Its mathematical scope is exactly the Lean statement below; the Registry note and source correspondence may describe motivation but do not strengthen it.
Lean learning studio · mathematics → formal proof

Read the mathematics first, then descend into Lean

You do not need to know Lean before opening this panel. The page keeps the paper-level theorem, rigorous proof obligations, exact Lean declaration, and proof dependencies as separate layers so a first-time reader can move down one layer at a time.

BeginnerWhy this theorem exists → intuition → statement → one hand calculation. Hide proof-engineering detail.
RigorousExpose assumptions, hidden measure/limit/domain issues, proof route, and rigorous references.
Lean learnerOpen the exact declaration, proof tree/network, syntax glossary, and line-by-line explanation.

Proof architecture

Start with the tree when learning: prerequisites sit below the theorem and downstream results sit above it. Switch to the network when you want to understand where this declaration lives in the local formal library. Every mapped node is clickable.

Loading source-derived dependency evidence…

Graph rule: only dependencies found by the ASTIS source scan are drawn. Missing tactic indirection is treated as an under-approximation; the site never invents an edge just to make a prettier graph.

How to read the exact Lean declaration

Read a Lean theorem left-to-right exactly as you would unpack a mathematical sentence: name → ambient types → automatically inferred structures → explicit hypotheses → conclusion → proof. Then read the proof top-to-bottom as transformations of the current goal.

  1. NameWhat reusable mathematical fact is being created?
  2. ParametersWhich symbols are arbitrary, and which structures are inferred by typeclass search?
  3. PropositionAfter the colon, translate the Lean expression back into a paper statement.
  4. Proof actionsAfter by, ask what each tactic does to the mathematical goal—not only what syntax it uses.

Syntax used on this page

This glossary is filtered to syntax that actually occurs in the declaration above. Open a symbol only when you meet it, rather than memorizing Lean grammar in advance.

Source voice and ASTIS voice stay separate

When Samplinglib shows a short quotation from Chewi, it is labeled as a source excerpt and linked to the canonical book page. Intuition, expanded proof steps, hidden regularity assumptions, and Lean explanations are ASTIS-authored commentary. A quotation never substitutes for a formal proof, and an ASTIS explanation is never attributed to the textbook author.

Lean statement

theorem exists_positive_real_square_root
    {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] (μ : Measure Ω)
    (D : Lp ℝ 2 μ →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 μ) (hD : D.IsPositive) :
    ∃ Γ : Lp ℝ 2 μ →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 μ,
      Γ.IsPositive ∧ Γ*Γ = D ∧
      ∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 μ, ‖Γ u‖^2 = inner ℝ (D u) u := by
  letI := IsStarNormal.instNonUnitalContinuousFunctionalCalculus
    (A := Lp ℂ 2 μ →L[ℂ] Lp ℂ 2 μ)
  letI : NonUnitalContinuousFunctionalCalculus ℂ
      (Lp ℂ 2 μ →L[ℂ] Lp ℂ 2 μ) IsStarNormal :=
    NonUnitalClosedEmbeddingContinuousFunctionalCalculus.toNonUnitalContinuousFunctionalCalculus
  letI : NonUnitalContinuousFunctionalCalculus ℝ
      (Lp ℂ 2 μ →L[ℂ] Lp ℂ 2 μ) IsSelfAdjoint :=
    IsSelfAdjoint.instNonUnitalContinuousFunctionalCalculus
    (A := Lp ℂ 2 μ →L[ℂ] Lp ℂ 2 μ)
  obtain ⟨hnorm,hfixed,Dc,hDc,hformula,hintertwine,hconj⟩ :=
    L2RealComplexOperator.exists_positive_complex_lift μ D hD
  let Rc : Lp ℂ 2 μ →L[ℂ] Lp ℂ 2 μ := CFC.sqrt Dc
  have hDcNonneg : 0 ≤ Dc := (ContinuousLinearMap.nonneg_iff_isPositive Dc).mpr hDc
  have hRcNonneg : 0 ≤ Rc := CFC.sqrt_nonneg Dc
  have hRc : Rc.IsPositive := (ContinuousLinearMap.nonneg_iff_isPositive Rc).mp hRcNonneg
  have hRcSq : Rc*Rc = Dc := CFC.sqrt_mul_sqrt_self Dc hDcNonneg
  have hKSq : conjugateOperator μ Rc * conjugateOperator μ Rc = Dc := by
    apply ContinuousLinearMap.ext
    intro g
    change conjugate μ (Rc (conjugate μ (conjugate μ (Rc (conjugate μ g))))) = Dc g
    rw [conjugate_involutive]
    have hpoint : Rc (Rc (conjugate μ g)) = Dc (conjugate μ g) :=
      congrArg (fun A : Lp ℂ 2 μ →L[ℂ] Lp ℂ 2 μ => A (conjugate μ g)) hRcSq
    rw [hpoint, hconj, conjugate_involutive]
  have hKNonneg : 0 ≤ conjugateOperator μ Rc :=
    (ContinuousLinearMap.nonneg_iff_isPositive _).mpr (conjugateOperator_positive μ Rc hRc)
  have hK : conjugateOperator μ Rc = Rc := (CFC.sqrt_unique hKSq hKNonneg).symm
  have hrootConj (g : Lp ℂ 2 μ) : conjugate μ (Rc g) = Rc (conjugate μ g) := by
    have hh := congrArg (fun A : Lp ℂ 2 μ →L[ℂ] Lp ℂ 2 μ => A (conjugate μ g)) hK
    change conjugate μ (Rc (conjugate μ (conjugate μ g))) = Rc (conjugate μ g) at hh
    simpa only [conjugate_involutive] using hh
  let Γ : Lp ℝ 2 μ →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 μ :=
    realPart μ ∘L Rc.restrictScalars ℝ ∘L embed μ
  have hbridge (u : Lp ℝ 2 μ) : embed μ (Γ u) = Rc (embed μ u) := by
    have hf : conjugate μ (embed μ u) = embed μ u := (hfixed _).mpr ⟨u,rfl⟩
    have hr : conjugate μ (Rc (embed μ u)) = Rc (embed μ u) := by rw [hrootConj, hf]
    obtain ⟨v,hv⟩ := (hfixed _).mp hr
    change embed μ (realPart μ (Rc (embed μ u))) = Rc (embed μ u)
    rw [← hv, real_embed]
  have hinj : Function.Injective (embed μ) := by
    intro u v h
    have hh := congrArg (realPart μ) h
    simpa only [real_embed] using hh
  have hΓSq : Γ*Γ = D := by
    apply ContinuousLinearMap.ext
    intro u
    apply hinj
    change embed μ (Γ (Γ u)) = embed μ (D u)
    rw [hbridge (Γ u),hbridge u]
    have hp : Rc (Rc (embed μ u)) = Dc (embed μ u) :=
      congrArg (fun A : Lp ℂ 2 μ →L[ℂ] Lp ℂ 2 μ => A (embed μ u)) hRcSq
    exact hp.trans (hintertwine u)
  have hΓ : Γ.IsPositive := by
    constructor
    · intro u v
      have hh := hRc.inner_left_eq_inner_right (embed μ u) (embed μ v)
      rw [← hbridge u, ← hbridge v, inner_embed, inner_embed] at hh
      exact Complex.ofReal_injective hh
    · intro u
      have hh := hRc.re_inner_nonneg_left (embed μ u)
      rw [← hbridge u, inner_embed] at hh
      simpa [ContinuousLinearMap.reApplyInnerSelf] using hh
  refine ⟨Γ,hΓ,hΓSq,?_⟩
  intro u
  calc
    ‖Γ u‖^2 = inner ℝ (Γ u) (Γ u) := (real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq _).symm
    _ = inner ℝ (Γ (Γ u)) u := (hΓ.inner_left_eq_inner_right (Γ u) u).symm
    _ = inner ℝ (D u) u := by
      change inner ℝ ((Γ*Γ) u) u = inner ℝ (D u) u
      rw [hΓSq]


end
end AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.L2RealSquareRoot

#print axioms AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.L2RealSquareRoot.exists_positive_real_square_root

Proof architecture

Actual PBPS consumer; no SALD admission

Lean proof walkthrough

  • Read the quantified variables and typeclass brackets as part of the mathematical statement; inferred arguments are not missing assumptions.
  • `intro` introduces quantified hypotheses into the local proof context.
  • `have` creates a named intermediate mathematical fact.
  • `calc` records an equality or inequality chain matching a paper calculation.
  • `rw` rewrites by an established identity.
  • `apply` reduces the goal to the hypotheses of a reusable theorem.
  • `refine` instantiates a reusable theorem while leaving explicit subgoals.
  • `exact` closes the current goal with an already typed term.

Why the statement has this shape

The declaration is kept at the reusable level recorded by its Registry tags and direct consumers. Explicit measures, spaces, wrappers, and regularity hypotheses expose interfaces that paper notation often infers. A theorem card explains those interfaces but never widens the compiled statement.

Hidden assumptions and non-claims

  • Measurability is represented explicitly or must be supplied by a dependency.
Common pitfall. A wrapper or display identity is not a new analytic theorem merely because it has its own Lean name. Check the statement, hypotheses, and downstream consumers before interpreting its mathematical contribution.