Angle Approximation
Exercise LA-015
nl bridge from inspected source. Current content-bound mathematical second pass accepted. No new Lean verification is claimed for this NL view.
Assumptions and conventions
- Finite-dimensional complex Hilbert spaces unless real amplitudes are explicitly specified
- All basis/register permutations are fixed and applied to both input and output
- Column-vector action; Euclidean induced operator norm for norm claims
- Source inspection only; no fresh formal verification
Question
Define R(theta)=[[cos(theta/2),-sin(theta/2)],[sin(theta/2),cos(theta/2)]]. Derive the exact operator distance between R(a) and R(b), and prove it is at most |a-b|/2. Why does adding any number of untouched spectator qubits not multiply the distance by a dimension factor?
Hint: mathematical route
Define R(theta)=[[cos(theta/2),-sin(theta/2)],[sin(theta/2),cos(theta/2)]]. Derive the exact operator distance between R(a) and R(b), and prove it is at most |a-b|/2. Why does adding any number of untouched spectator qubits not multiply the distance by a dimension factor?
- Use sum-difference identities to factor the difference by a unitary.
- Take scalar-times-unitary norm to obtain the exact sine expression.
- Apply sine Lipschitz bound; spectator lift remains unitary.
Reference solution
Trigonometric sum-difference formulas factor R(a)-R(b)=2 sin((a-b)/4) R((a+b)/2+pi). The second factor is unitary, so its induced Euclidean operator norm is1, giving exactly 2|sin((a-b)/4)|. Since |sin x|<=|x|, the distance is <=|a-b|/2. Adding identity spectators, with any fixed wire placement, tensors the difference with an identity and conjugates by a permutation. The identity has norm1 and unitary conjugation preserves the norm; hence the same scalar-times-unitary factorization has no dimension multiplier. This is uniform operator error, not entrywise error or a finite-bit synthesis algorithm.
Assessment rubric
- Exact quarter-angle sine formula (1 weight)
- Correct linear bound factor1/2 (1 weight)
- Explain dimension independence in induced norm (1 weight)
Graph-grounded prerequisites
These are support/source anchors, not an automatically extracted theorem-dependency proof.
Lean view and evidence boundary
No aligned Lean view has been admitted for this native core in this textbook checkpoint. This is not a claim that the underlying mathematics lacks a formal proof. Contributions must preserve this exact target contract and split.
Sources and provenance
- QuantumBlockEncoding/PrimitiveRyPerturbation.lean
difference_factor28-37; liftedRy factor54-59; distance61-79
Source SHA-256:57ad888af7a81ac5067f6655160fecf1f197a91b0414bc5e510786b9eed27e32· MIT (repository LICENSE)
Contract: bc4e15074deae045466bc02c4ce3414069aec77ee27c77e71a0bee2be453b5df
Item digest: 4ac0d74781d50ead023fd5830a7e8e5cda93b4580d32f2f4ef85299e32890567
Graph snapshot: qcb-snapshot-ffa644f0da3031a1ce754b9a
Authored support steps: 3. This is not measured graph distance or model difficulty.