QuantumComputinglib learn · inspect · formalize
Checked on this commit 4,524 public declarations commit 4e2c5b2c0be5 Build record

Quantum Information / Quantum Information Apps

Quantum Information Apps

Exercise PLAN-403

intermediate · counterexample · test_public

primary source nl only. Current content-bound mathematical second pass accepted. No new Lean verification is claimed for this NL view.

Assumptions and conventions

      Question

      It is a theorem that if rho_AB is k-extendible and N : B -> B' is any quantum channel, then (id_A tensor N)(rho_AB) is again k-extendible; applying a channel to one side can only preserve or improve extendibility. One might conjecture the converse: that if the output (id_A tensor N)(rho_AB) is k-extendible then the input rho_AB must already have been k-extendible. Disprove this converse. Build your counterexample from the isotropic family rho_AB(x) = (1 - x) Phi+ + (x/d^2) I, using that it is the image of the maximally entangled state under a depolarizing channel, rho_AB(x) = (id_A tensor D_x)(Phi+) with D_x(sigma) = (1 - x) sigma + x tr(sigma) I/d, together with the isotropic k-extendibility condition x >= (d/(d+1))(1 - 1/k). Exhibit an explicit input, channel, and k.

      Hint: mathematical route

      The converse of channel-preserved extendibility fails: the depolarizing channel sends the non-2-extendible Phi+ to a 2-extendible isotropic state, so a channel can create extendibility the input lacked.

      1. A pure entangled state such as Phi+ is not 2-extendible.
      2. The depolarizing channel maps Phi+ to the isotropic state rho(x).
      3. Choosing x in the 2-extendible window gives an extendible output from a non-extendible input.
      Reference solution

      The converse fails. Take the input to be the maximally entangled state itself, rho_AB = Phi+ = rho_AB(x=0). This is a pure entangled state, hence NOT 2-extendible: a pure entangled bipartite state has no 2-extension, because any state whose B'-marginal equals a pure psi_AB must factorize as psi_AB tensor omega_{B'} (Exercise 7.3), and then its A B'-marginal is the uncorrelated psi_A tensor omega_{B'}, which cannot equal the correlated psi_AB. Now let the channel be the depolarizing channel N = D_x. The output is (id_A tensor D_x)(Phi+) = rho_AB(x), an isotropic state, which by the isotropic condition is k-extendible precisely when x >= (d/(d+1))(1 - 1/k). Concretely for k = 2 the condition is x >= (d/(d+1))(1/2) = d/(2(d+1)); pick any such x -- for instance x = d/(d+1) >= d/(2(d+1)), which even makes the output separable and hence infinitely extendible. Then the output rho_AB(x) is 2-extendible, yet the input Phi+ is a pure entangled state that is not even 2-extendible. This is a k-extendible output arising from a non-k-extendible input, disproving the converse. The mechanism: the depolarizing channel degrades entanglement by mixing the state toward the identity, so a channel can create extendibility that the input lacked -- extendibility is monotone under channels in one direction only.

      Assessment rubric
      1. Identifies that a pure entangled bipartite state (e.g. Phi+) has no 2-extension, with the Exercise-7.3 reason (1 weight)
      2. Uses rho_AB(x) = (id_A tensor D_x)(Phi+) to realize an isotropic output as a channel image of Phi+ (1 weight)
      3. Chooses x satisfying the isotropic 2-extendibility window x >= d/(2(d+1)) so the output IS 2-extendible (1 weight)
      4. Concludes a k-extendible output from a non-k-extendible input, refuting the converse, and explains the one-way monotonicity (1 weight)

      Graph-grounded prerequisites

      These are support/source anchors, not an automatically extracted theorem-dependency proof.

      • Operator and semigroup theory (frozen curriculum anchor; see graph registry)
      • Probability and sampling (frozen curriculum anchor; see graph registry)
      • Tensor networks (frozen curriculum anchor; see graph registry)

      Download the shared core registry

      Lean view and evidence boundary

      No aligned Lean view has been admitted for this native core in this textbook checkpoint. This is not a claim that the underlying mathematics lacks a formal proof. Contributions must preserve this exact target contract and split.

      Read the Lean track and existing diagnostic warmups

      Sources and provenance

      Contract: 12791f17f0b5e85427e37c81fcb3cba157f767784b22f68806097a88107e171c

      Item digest: e4a453dba730b81064c7eab905c12090da22e6fb67aa29a08ee0feccfc0ce3f0

      Graph snapshot: qcb-snapshot-ffa644f0da3031a1ce754b9a

      Authored support steps: 3. This is not measured graph distance or model difficulty.