BanditRLlib
Lean gate passed before this site build; local proof declarations are shown as compiled.Lean-verified build · exact declarations linked.

Posed → progress → resolution → formalization

Bandit & RL Frontier Problem History

Source-traceable open-problem history. Core Bandit/RL problems are separated from adjacent Online Learning/optimization/statistics routes. A record may be currently open, partially resolved, resolved, negatively resolved, or resolved with an external formalization. Missing Lean code is tracked separately from mathematical openness.

16core Bandit/RL histories
8resolved histories in this audit
6open/partial current audits
3closure audits still needed

Mathematical openness and Lean openness are different ledgers

An old open-problem paper is discovery evidence, not proof that the problem is still open. Current closure status is dated and source-traceable; external/preprint/peer-reviewed resolutions stay distinct. Missing local Lean code is tracked separately.

Core Bandit / RL problem histories

These questions change a Bandit or reinforcement-learning theorem contract directly.

P0 · resolved-formalized-external

Gap-entropy conjecture and almost instance-wise optimal BAI

Best-arm identification / pure exploration

Posed by. Lijie Chen and Jian Li · 2016

Local Lean. bridge-only

Graph delta. Adds a BAI-specific information-complexity branch: gap groups → normalized complexity masses → entropy; permutation-averaged instance benchmark; measurable adaptive sampling/stopping; lower-bound change-of-measure; universal algorithm; policy-representation equivalences.

Open dedicated case → · Primary problem/source ↗

P0 · resolved-negative-preprint

Does fixed-budget BAI admit an instance complexity matching the static oracle?

Best-arm identification / fixed budget

Posed by. Chao Qin · 2022

Local Lean. planned

Graph delta. A negative-resolution case should connect oracle allocation geometry, change of measure and impossibility of one uniform instance-complexity functional.

Primary problem/source ↗

P0 · resolved-preprint

Regret minimization with unknown heavy-tail parameters

Heavy-tailed bandits / parameter-free learning

Posed by. Gianmarco Genalti and Alberto Maria Metelli · 2025

Local Lean. P0-candidate

Graph delta. High-value bridge from robust mean estimation/concentration to bandit regret, with lower-bound adaptation tradeoffs and scheduled exploration.

Primary problem/source ↗

P1 · resolved-peer-reviewed

First-order regret bounds for contextual bandits

Contextual bandits

Posed by. Alekh Agarwal, Akshay Krishnamurthy, John Langford, Haipeng Luo and Robert E. Schapire · 2017

Local Lean. planned

Graph delta. Useful historical shortcut case: policy-space augmentation changes how first-order online-learning machinery reaches contextual partial feedback.

Primary problem/source ↗

P1 · partial-current-audit

Model selection for contextual bandits

Contextual bandits / model selection

Posed by. Dylan J. Foster, Akshay Krishnamurthy and Haipeng Luo · 2020

Local Lean. planned

Graph delta. Connects contextual-bandit regret to nested classes, misspecification tests, bias/variance adaptation and impossibility nodes.

Primary problem/source ↗

P0 · source-open-current-audit

Tight online confidence intervals for RKHS elements

Kernel / RKHS bandits

Posed by. Sattar Vakili, Jonathan Scarlett and Tara Javidi · 2021

Local Lean. P0-candidate

Graph delta. Directly asks whether the confidence-sequence node or the algorithm analysis is the bottleneck; ideal for proof-graph diagnosis across GP-UCB/GP-TS/kernel RL.

Primary problem/source ↗

P0 · source-open-current-audit

Order-optimal regret in noise-free kernel bandits

Kernel / RKHS bandits

Posed by. Sattar Vakili · 2022

Local Lean. P0-candidate

Graph delta. Separates deterministic approximation/interpolation error from statistical confidence; likely cross-pollination with numerical approximation and RKHS geometry.

Primary problem/source ↗

P1 · source-open-current-audit

Complexity of joint differential privacy in linear contextual bandits

Privacy / linear contextual bandits

Posed by. Achraf Azize and Debabrota Basu · 2024

Local Lean. planned

Graph delta. Adds privacy accounting/noise geometry on top of self-normalized linear-bandit confidence and regret lower bounds.

Primary problem/source ↗

P0 · source-open-current-audit

Order-optimal regret bounds for kernel-based RL

Kernel reinforcement learning

Posed by. Sattar Vakili · 2024

Local Lean. P0-candidate

Graph delta. Natural bridge between the RKHS-confidence frontier and the finite-horizon RL confidence/optimism graph already present in BanditRLlib.

Primary problem/source ↗

P0 · resolved-peer-reviewed

Lattimore–Szepesvari Chapter 17 distributional-regret conjecture

Distributional / high-probability regret

Posed by. Tor Lattimore and Csaba Szepesvari · 2020

Local Lean. existing-case

Graph delta. Already an excellent internal historical frontier: lower-tail spine is local; the 2026 EQO+ upper route remains a formalization leaf.

Primary problem/source ↗

P1 · resolved-peer-reviewed

Parameter-free adaptation to comparator switches in unconstrained linear bandits

Dynamic / linear bandits

Posed by. Long-standing literature problem (source chain to be frozen before theorem-level port)

Local Lean. planned

Graph delta. Connects dynamic-regret comparator complexity, parameter-free meta-combination and linear-bandit geometry.

Primary problem/source ↗

P2 · audit-needed

Approximate planning of POMDPs in memoryless policies

POMDP / planning

Posed by. Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Alessandro Lazaric and Animashree Anandkumar · 2016

Local Lean. defer-until-RL-route

Graph delta. RL-side computational frontier: nonconvex planning and partial observability rather than statistical regret alone.

Primary problem/source ↗

P1 · audit-needed

Dependence of sample-complexity lower bounds on planning horizon

Reinforcement learning / lower bounds

Posed by. Nan Jiang and Alekh Agarwal · 2018

Local Lean. planned

Graph delta. High-value lower-bound bridge for the RL book: separates horizon dependence from assumptions that can hide it.

Primary problem/source ↗

P2 · audit-needed

Risk of ruin in multi-armed bandits

Safe / risk-sensitive bandits

Posed by. Filipo S. Perotto, Mathieu Bourgais, Bruno C. Silva and Laurent Vercouter · 2019

Local Lean. planned

Graph delta. Combines multi-objective reward/safety, absorbing ruin events and budget dynamics; good candidate for safe-bandit cross-pollination.

Primary problem/source ↗

P2 · resolved-peer-reviewed

Multi-armed bandits with limited expert advice

Adversarial bandits / expert advice

Posed by. Seldin et al. (COLT 2013 open problem) · 2013

Local Lean. low-priority-history

Graph delta. Compact historical example of a resource-constrained information interface producing a matching minimax scale.

Primary problem/source ↗

P0 · resolved-preprint

Can quantum-bandit regret be independent of the horizon?

Quantum multi-armed / linear bandits

Posed by. Zongqi Wan, Zhijie Zhang, Tongyang Li, Jialin Zhang and Xiaoming Sun · 2023

Local Lean. P0-cross-library-candidate

Graph delta. Quantum-access lower-bound bridge: a high-confidence single-arm quantum testing lower bound via the polynomial method and a Remez-type inequality is lifted by a bandit-to-testing reduction to QMAB, with a linear embedding for QLB. The eventual Lean route should reuse ABRL lower-bound/testing structure and source quantum semantics/testing primitives from ASPBE or audited quantum Lean libraries through an explicit adapter.

Primary problem/source ↗

Adjacent project frontier

These are useful to ABRL, but their mathematical contract belongs to Online Learning, optimization, statistics, games, or another cross-library route. They are intentionally not counted as core Bandit/RL open problems.

P2 · source-open-current-audit

Provable online regret for feature-priming methods

Online learning / sparse linear prediction

Posed by. Manfred K. Warmuth and Ehsan Amid · 2023

Local Lean. route-to-online-learning

Graph delta. Adjacent Online Learning bridge: sparse multiplicative updates / relative-entropy regularization versus closed-form least-squares-style priming. The core question is online regret, so it belongs to the Online Learning book and the technique/Functor graph rather than the core Bandit/RL frontier.

Primary problem/source ↗

Screened open-problem collections

We record collections that were checked even when they contribute zero core Bandit/RL questions. This prevents “not listed” from being confused with “not audited”.

screened 2026-09-19

COLT 2023 Open Problems

Core Bandit/RL items: 0 · Adjacent routed items: 2

  • log(n) factor in Local Glivenko-Cantelli — adjacent-statistics; Do not list as a core Bandit/RL frontier problem.
  • The Sample Complexity of Multi-Distribution Learning for VC Classes — adjacent-statistical-learning; Do not list as a core Bandit/RL frontier problem.
  • Polynomial linearly-convergent method for g-convex optimization? — cross-library-optimization-geometry; Route to Sampling/Optimisation/Geometry-Lib rather than BanditRLwiki.
  • Is There a First-Order Method that Only Converges to Local Minimax Optima? — adjacent-minimax-optimization; Keep outside the core Bandit/RL frontier unless a later bandit/game reduction is explicitly sourced.
  • Learning sparse linear concepts by priming the features — adjacent-online-learning; Index as an adjacent Online Learning frontier because the open question asks for online regret guarantees; do not mislabel it as a bandit theorem.

Open source collection ↗

How to add or update a problem history

Freeze the primary problem statement, current resolution evidence, publication status, exact Lean status and expected graph delta. Then use the same contributor contract as theorem work; a missing formalization must never be relabelled as a literature-open theorem.

Contributor/Codex contract →