Samplinglib
Lean gate passed 2026-08-19T06:32:39.895922+00:00 · 7bcd37294df1
Registry leaf card · analysis.calculus.radial-smooth-cutoff-iterated-fderiv-two-bound

radialSmoothCutoff_iteratedFDeriv_two_bound

compiled Samplinglib leaf Not mapped explicit smoke test

- A single positive constant controls the second iterated Fréchet derivative of every positive-scale radial cutoff by `C / R^2`. The proof first bounds the second derivative of the unit-scale radial cutoff using continuity and compact support. It then writes the radius-`R` cutoff as the unit cutoff composed with scalar dilation and applies Mathlib's exact iterated-derivative composition rule for continuous linear maps.

Plain-English statement

- A single positive constant controls the second iterated Fréchet derivative of every positive-scale radial cutoff by `C / R^2`. The proof first bounds the second derivative of the unit-scale radial cutoff using continuity and compact support. It then writes the radius-`R` cutoff as the unit cutoff composed with scalar dilation and applies Mathlib's exact iterated-derivative composition rule for continuous linear maps.

Scope guard. This card records a compiled local declaration. Its mathematical scope is exactly the Lean statement below; the Registry note and source correspondence may describe motivation but do not strengthen it.
Lean learning studio · mathematics → formal proof

Read the mathematics first, then descend into Lean

You do not need to know Lean before opening this panel. The page keeps the paper-level theorem, rigorous proof obligations, exact Lean declaration, and proof dependencies as separate layers so a first-time reader can move down one layer at a time.

BeginnerWhy this theorem exists → intuition → statement → one hand calculation. Hide proof-engineering detail.
RigorousExpose assumptions, hidden measure/limit/domain issues, proof route, and rigorous references.
Lean learnerOpen the exact declaration, proof tree/network, syntax glossary, and line-by-line explanation.

Proof architecture

Start with the tree when learning: prerequisites sit below the theorem and downstream results sit above it. Switch to the network when you want to understand where this declaration lives in the local formal library. Every mapped node is clickable.

Loading source-derived dependency evidence…

Graph rule: only dependencies found by the ASTIS source scan are drawn. Missing tactic indirection is treated as an under-approximation; the site never invents an edge just to make a prettier graph.

How to read the exact Lean declaration

Read a Lean theorem left-to-right exactly as you would unpack a mathematical sentence: name → ambient types → automatically inferred structures → explicit hypotheses → conclusion → proof. Then read the proof top-to-bottom as transformations of the current goal.

  1. NameWhat reusable mathematical fact is being created?
  2. ParametersWhich symbols are arbitrary, and which structures are inferred by typeclass search?
  3. PropositionAfter the colon, translate the Lean expression back into a paper statement.
  4. Proof actionsAfter by, ask what each tactic does to the mathematical goal—not only what syntax it uses.

Syntax used on this page

This glossary is filtered to syntax that actually occurs in the declaration above. Open a symbol only when you meet it, rather than memorizing Lean grammar in advance.

Source voice and ASTIS voice stay separate

When Samplinglib shows a short quotation from Chewi, it is labeled as a source excerpt and linked to the canonical book page. Intuition, expanded proof steps, hidden regularity assumptions, and Lean explanations are ASTIS-authored commentary. A quotation never substitutes for a formal proof, and an ASTIS explanation is never attributed to the textbook author.

Lean statement

theorem radialSmoothCutoff_iteratedFDeriv_two_bound
    [InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [Nontrivial E] :
    ∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ R : ℝ, 0 < R → ∀ x : E,
      ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ 2 (radialSmoothCutoff R : E → ℝ) x‖ ≤ C / R ^ 2 := by
  have hunit_smooth : ContDiff ℝ (⊤ : ℕ∞)
      (radialSmoothCutoff 1 : E → ℝ) :=
    radialSmoothCutoff_contDiff one_pos
  have hunit_continuous : Continuous
      (iteratedFDeriv ℝ 2 (radialSmoothCutoff 1 : E → ℝ)) :=
    hunit_smooth.continuous_iteratedFDeriv
      (WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr (le_top : (2 : ℕ∞) ≤ ⊤))
  have hunit_support : HasCompactSupport
      (iteratedFDeriv ℝ 2 (radialSmoothCutoff 1 : E → ℝ)) :=
    (radialSmoothCutoff_hasCompactSupport one_pos).iteratedFDeriv 2
  obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ :=
    hunit_support.exists_bound_of_continuous hunit_continuous
  let C' : ℝ := max C 1
  have hC'_pos : 0 < C' := lt_max_of_lt_right one_pos
  refine ⟨C', hC'_pos, ?_⟩
  intro R hR x
  let L : E →L[ℝ] E := R⁻¹ • ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ E
  have hL_norm : ‖L‖ ≤ 1 / R := by
    refine L.opNorm_le_bound (by positivity) ?_
    intro y
    simp only [L, smul_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.id_apply]
    rw [norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_inv, abs_of_pos hR]
    simp [one_div]
  have hfun : (radialSmoothCutoff R : E → ℝ) =
      (radialSmoothCutoff 1 : E → ℝ) ∘ L := by
    funext y
    simp only [radialSmoothCutoff, Function.comp_apply, L,
      smul_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.id_apply, div_one]
    rw [norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_inv, abs_of_pos hR]
    ring_nf
  rw [hfun]
  rw [L.iteratedFDeriv_comp_right hunit_smooth x
    (i := 2) (WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr (le_top : (2 : ℕ∞) ≤ ⊤))]
  calc
    ‖(iteratedFDeriv ℝ 2 (radialSmoothCutoff 1 : E → ℝ) (L x)).compContinuousLinearMap
        (fun _ => L)‖ ≤
        ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ 2 (radialSmoothCutoff 1 : E → ℝ) (L x)‖ *
          ∏ _ : Fin 2, ‖L‖ :=
      ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_compContinuousLinearMap_le _ _
    _ = ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ 2 (radialSmoothCutoff 1 : E → ℝ) (L x)‖ * ‖L‖ ^ 2 := by
      simp
    _ ≤ C' * (1 / R) ^ 2 := by
      gcongr
      exact (hC (L x)).trans (le_max_left C 1)
    _ = C' / R ^ 2 := by ring

/-- At each fixed point, the positive-scale radial cutoffs tend to one as the scale diverges. -/

Proof architecture

log-concave sampling Ch.1 second-order exhaustion branch: one constant controls the second iterated Frechet derivative at every positive scale by C/R^2

Lean proof walkthrough

  • Read the quantified variables and typeclass brackets as part of the mathematical statement; inferred arguments are not missing assumptions.
  • `intro` introduces quantified hypotheses into the local proof context.
  • `have` creates a named intermediate mathematical fact.
  • `calc` records an equality or inequality chain matching a paper calculation.
  • `rw` rewrites by an established identity.
  • `simp` normalizes through registered definitional and theorem rewrites.
  • `refine` instantiates a reusable theorem while leaving explicit subgoals.
  • `exact` closes the current goal with an already typed term.

Why the statement has this shape

The declaration is kept at the reusable level recorded by its Registry tags and direct consumers. Explicit measures, spaces, wrappers, and regularity hypotheses expose interfaces that paper notation often infers. A theorem card explains those interfaces but never widens the compiled statement.

Hidden assumptions and non-claims

  • Totalized `fderiv` values must not be read as a differentiability theorem.
  • Pointwise support, topological support, and compact support retain distinct meanings.
  • A cutoff lemma does not by itself prove a whole-space integration-by-parts identity.
Common pitfall. A wrapper or display identity is not a new analytic theorem merely because it has its own Lean name. Check the statement, hypotheses, and downstream consumers before interpreting its mathematical contribution.