Plain-English statement
- If a scalar cutoff is supported in the open Pi-box, then multiplying any Pi-space vector field by this cutoff gives a vector field supported in the open Pi-box. This only uses `Function.support`; it is not a `HasCompactSupport` theorem and does not build a cutoff.
Read the mathematics first, then descend into Lean
You do not need to know Lean before opening this panel. The page keeps the paper-level theorem, rigorous proof obligations, exact Lean declaration, and proof dependencies as separate layers so a first-time reader can move down one layer at a time.
Proof architecture
Start with the tree when learning: prerequisites sit below the theorem and downstream results sit above it. Switch to the network when you want to understand where this declaration lives in the local formal library. Every mapped node is clickable.
Graph rule: only dependencies found by the ASTIS source scan are drawn. Missing tactic indirection is treated as an under-approximation; the site never invents an edge just to make a prettier graph.
How to read the exact Lean declaration
Read a Lean theorem left-to-right exactly as you would unpack a mathematical sentence: name → ambient types → automatically inferred structures → explicit hypotheses → conclusion → proof. Then read the proof top-to-bottom as transformations of the current goal.
- NameWhat reusable mathematical fact is being created?
- ParametersWhich symbols are arbitrary, and which structures are inferred by typeclass search?
- PropositionAfter the colon, translate the Lean expression back into a paper statement.
- Proof actionsAfter
by, ask what each tactic does to the mathematical goal—not only what syntax it uses.
Syntax used on this page
This glossary is filtered to syntax that actually occurs in the declaration above. Open a symbol only when you meet it, rather than memorizing Lean grammar in advance.
Source voice and ASTIS voice stay separate
When Samplinglib shows a short quotation from Chewi, it is labeled as a source excerpt and linked to the canonical book page. Intuition, expanded proof steps, hidden regularity assumptions, and Lean explanations are ASTIS-authored commentary. A quotation never substitutes for a formal proof, and an ASTIS explanation is never attributed to the textbook author.
Lean statement
theorem support_smul_subset_univ_pi_Ioo_of_scalar_support_subset_univ_pi_Ioo
{n : ℕ}
(a b : Fin (n + 1) → ℝ)
(χ : (Fin (n + 1) → ℝ) → ℝ)
(G : (Fin (n + 1) → ℝ) → Fin (n + 1) → ℝ)
(hχsupp : Function.support χ ⊆
(Set.univ.pi fun i => Set.Ioo (a i) (b i))) :
Function.support (fun x => χ x • G x) ⊆
(Set.univ.pi fun i => Set.Ioo (a i) (b i)) := by
exact support_smul_subset_univ_pi_Ioo_of_eq_zero_off_univ_pi_Ioo a b χ G
(by
intro x hxbox
by_contra hχne
exact hxbox (hχsupp hχne))
/-- If the topological support of a scalar cutoff is contained in the open
Pi-box, then multiplying any vector field by that cutoff is plain-supported in
the same open box.
This is the direct consumer-facing bridge from Mathlib's `tsupport` cutoff
output to the cutoff-smul support hypothesis used by the finite-box zero-face
route. It does not prove cutoff construction, regularity of the smul field,
tail decay, or whole-space integration by parts. -/
Open AutoSamplingTheory/TechnicalLemmas/Analysis/Calculus/Divergence.lean:1018published source at 7bcd37294df1
Proof architecture
log-concave sampling Ch.1 cutoff route: a scalar cutoff supported in the open Pi-box forces the cutoff-smul vector field to be supported in the open Pi-box
Lean proof walkthrough
- Read the quantified variables and typeclass brackets as part of the mathematical statement; inferred arguments are not missing assumptions.
- `intro` introduces quantified hypotheses into the local proof context.
- `exact` closes the current goal with an already typed term.
Why the statement has this shape
The declaration is kept at the reusable level recorded by its Registry tags and direct consumers. Explicit measures, spaces, wrappers, and regularity hypotheses expose interfaces that paper notation often infers. A theorem card explains those interfaces but never widens the compiled statement.
Hidden assumptions and non-claims
- Pointwise support, topological support, and compact support retain distinct meanings.
- A cutoff lemma does not by itself prove a whole-space integration-by-parts identity.