Samplinglib
Lean gate passed 2026-08-19T06:32:39.895922+00:00 · 7bcd37294df1
Reviewed teaching declaration · semigroup-decay.converse-from-shifted-exponential

scaled_dissipation_of_exponential_decay

compiled Samplinglib leaf Partial explicit smoke test

Exponential decay after every starting time forces the instantaneous coercivity inequality at each starting point.

Plain-English statement

Exponential decay after every starting time forces the instantaneous coercivity inequality at each starting point.

Scope guard. This card records a compiled local declaration. Its mathematical scope is exactly the Lean statement below; the Registry note and source correspondence may describe motivation but do not strengthen it.

Mathematical statement

If E(s+t)≤E(s)exp(-rt) for every s and t≥0, and E'(s)=-aD(s), then rE(s)≤aD(s).

Intuition

At time s, the true energy curve lies below its tangent exponential envelope and touches it. Their difference has a one-sided local maximum, so its right derivative cannot be positive.

Conditions

  • the exact right derivative E'(s)=-aD(s) exists
  • the decay estimate is valid after every starting time, not only from time zero
  • the comparison exponential uses the same rate r

Why these conditions cannot be dropped

  • decay only from time zero does not determine the derivative at a later arbitrary time
  • the one-sided derivative and positive tangent direction match nonnegative semigroup time

Proof route

  • subtract the shifted exponential envelope from the energy
  • show the difference has a local maximum at the starting time on [s,∞)
  • apply one-sided Fermat in the positive tangent direction
  • rewrite the derivative inequality as coercivity

Lean interface notes

  • the positive direction 1 is proved to lie in the tangent cone using the nhdsGT filter
  • the theorem is scalar and does not infer a density or generator domain
Lean learning studio · mathematics → formal proof

Read the mathematics first, then descend into Lean

You do not need to know Lean before opening this panel. The page keeps the paper-level theorem, rigorous proof obligations, exact Lean declaration, and proof dependencies as separate layers so a first-time reader can move down one layer at a time.

BeginnerWhy this theorem exists → intuition → statement → one hand calculation. Hide proof-engineering detail.
RigorousExpose assumptions, hidden measure/limit/domain issues, proof route, and rigorous references.
Lean learnerOpen the exact declaration, proof tree/network, syntax glossary, and line-by-line explanation.

Proof architecture

Start with the tree when learning: prerequisites sit below the theorem and downstream results sit above it. Switch to the network when you want to understand where this declaration lives in the local formal library. Every mapped node is clickable.

Loading source-derived dependency evidence…

Graph rule: only dependencies found by the ASTIS source scan are drawn. Missing tactic indirection is treated as an under-approximation; the site never invents an edge just to make a prettier graph.

How to read the exact Lean declaration

Read a Lean theorem left-to-right exactly as you would unpack a mathematical sentence: name → ambient types → automatically inferred structures → explicit hypotheses → conclusion → proof. Then read the proof top-to-bottom as transformations of the current goal.

  1. NameWhat reusable mathematical fact is being created?
  2. ParametersWhich symbols are arbitrary, and which structures are inferred by typeclass search?
  3. PropositionAfter the colon, translate the Lean expression back into a paper statement.
  4. Proof actionsAfter by, ask what each tactic does to the mathematical goal—not only what syntax it uses.

Syntax used on this page

This glossary is filtered to syntax that actually occurs in the declaration above. Open a symbol only when you meet it, rather than memorizing Lean grammar in advance.

Source voice and ASTIS voice stay separate

When Samplinglib shows a short quotation from Chewi, it is labeled as a source excerpt and linked to the canonical book page. Intuition, expanded proof steps, hidden regularity assumptions, and Lean explanations are ASTIS-authored commentary. A quotation never substitutes for a formal proof, and an ASTIS explanation is never attributed to the textbook author.

Lean statement

theorem scaled_dissipation_of_exponential_decay
    {scale rate : ℝ} (curve : DissipationCurve scale)
    (hdecay : ∀ s t : ℝ, 0 ≤ t →
      curve.energy (s + t) ≤
        curve.energy s * Real.exp (-rate * t)) :
    ∀ s : ℝ,
      rate * curve.energy s ≤ scale * curve.dissipation s := by
  intro s
  let comparison : ℝ → ℝ := fun x =>
    curve.energy x -
      curve.energy s * Real.exp (-rate * (x - s))
  have hmax : IsLocalMaxOn comparison (Ici s) s := by
    filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with x hx
    have hdecay_x :
        curve.energy x ≤
          curve.energy s * Real.exp (-rate * (x - s)) := by
      have h := hdecay s (x - s) (sub_nonneg.mpr hx)
      calc
        curve.energy x = curve.energy (s + (x - s)) := by
          congr 1
          ring
        _ ≤ curve.energy s * Real.exp (-rate * (x - s)) := h
    dsimp [comparison]
    calc
      curve.energy x -
          curve.energy s * Real.exp (-rate * (x - s)) ≤ 0 :=
        sub_nonpos.mpr hdecay_x
      _ = curve.energy s -
          curve.energy s * Real.exp (-rate * (s - s)) := by simp
  have hinner :
      HasDerivAt (fun x : ℝ => -rate * (x - s)) (-rate) s := by
    change HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => -rate * (id y - s)) (-rate) s
    have hraw := ((hasDerivAt_id s).sub_const s).const_mul (-rate)
    exact hraw.congr_deriv (by ring)
  have hexponential :
      HasDerivAt
        (fun x : ℝ =>
          curve.energy s * Real.exp (-rate * (x - s)))
        (-rate * curve.energy s) s := by
    have hraw := hinner.exp.const_mul (curve.energy s)
    apply hraw.congr_deriv
    rw [sub_self, mul_zero, Real.exp_zero]
    ring
  have hderiv :
      HasDerivWithinAt comparison
        ((-scale * curve.dissipation s) -
          (-rate * curve.energy s))
        (Ici s) s := by
    change HasDerivWithinAt
      (curve.energy - fun x : ℝ =>
        curve.energy s * Real.exp (-rate * (x - s)))
      ((-scale * curve.dissipation s) - (-rate * curve.energy s))
      (Ici s) s
    exact (curve.energy_hasDerivWithinAt s).sub
      hexponential.hasDerivWithinAt
  have hone : (1 : ℝ) ∈ posTangentConeAt (Ici s) s := by
    rw [one_mem_posTangentConeAt_iff_frequently]
    have hev : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[>] s, x ∈ Ici s := by
      filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with x hx
      have hsx : s < x := by
        simpa only [mem_Ioi] using hx
      exact hsx.le
    exact hev.frequently
  have hnonpos :=
    hmax.hasFDerivWithinAt_nonpos hderiv.hasFDerivWithinAt hone
  have hscalar :
      ((-scale * curve.dissipation s) -
        (-rate * curve.energy s)) ≤ 0 := by
    simpa using hnonpos
  linarith

/-- Forward direction of Chewi, Theorem 1.2.21, between arbitrary times. -/
Common pitfall. A wrapper or display identity is not a new analytic theorem merely because it has its own Lean name. Check the statement, hypotheses, and downstream consumers before interpreting its mathematical contribution.