Samplinglib
Lean gate passed 2026-08-19T06:32:39.895922+00:00 · 7bcd37294df1
Reviewed teaching declaration · ito-elementary.chewi-display-1-1-7

chewi_display_1_1_7

compiled Samplinglib leaf Compiled explicit smoke test

The squared process norm on probability times time equals the expectation of the squared time integral.

Plain-English statement

The squared process norm on probability times time equals the expectation of the squared time integral.

Scope guard. This card records a compiled local declaration. Its mathematical scope is exactly the Lean statement below; the Registry note and source correspondence may describe motivation but do not strengthen it.

Mathematical statement

Integral eta(t,omega)^2 d(P tensor m_[0,T]) equals integral over omega of the integral over t of eta(t,omega)^2.

Intuition

Tonelli is the rigorous bridge between the product-space L2 norm and the expected accumulated energy used by the Ito isometry.

Conditions

  • finite terminal-time measure
  • joint a.e. measurability of the squared process

Why these conditions cannot be dropped

  • finiteness of the time measure supplies the product-measure API
  • measurability is required by Tonelli
  • ENNReal avoids hiding an infinite energy

Proof route

  • construct the finite NNReal time measure
  • form the probability-time product measure
  • apply Mathlib lintegral_prod

Lean interface notes

  • processL2Energy is ENNReal-valued
  • the theorem does not claim the Ito isometry or L2 completion
Lean learning studio · mathematics → formal proof

Read the mathematics first, then descend into Lean

You do not need to know Lean before opening this panel. The page keeps the paper-level theorem, rigorous proof obligations, exact Lean declaration, and proof dependencies as separate layers so a first-time reader can move down one layer at a time.

BeginnerWhy this theorem exists → intuition → statement → one hand calculation. Hide proof-engineering detail.
RigorousExpose assumptions, hidden measure/limit/domain issues, proof route, and rigorous references.
Lean learnerOpen the exact declaration, proof tree/network, syntax glossary, and line-by-line explanation.

Proof architecture

Start with the tree when learning: prerequisites sit below the theorem and downstream results sit above it. Switch to the network when you want to understand where this declaration lives in the local formal library. Every mapped node is clickable.

Loading source-derived dependency evidence…

Graph rule: only dependencies found by the ASTIS source scan are drawn. Missing tactic indirection is treated as an under-approximation; the site never invents an edge just to make a prettier graph.

How to read the exact Lean declaration

Read a Lean theorem left-to-right exactly as you would unpack a mathematical sentence: name → ambient types → automatically inferred structures → explicit hypotheses → conclusion → proof. Then read the proof top-to-bottom as transformations of the current goal.

  1. NameWhat reusable mathematical fact is being created?
  2. ParametersWhich symbols are arbitrary, and which structures are inferred by typeclass search?
  3. PropositionAfter the colon, translate the Lean expression back into a paper statement.
  4. Proof actionsAfter by, ask what each tactic does to the mathematical goal—not only what syntax it uses.

Syntax used on this page

This glossary is filtered to syntax that actually occurs in the declaration above. Open a symbol only when you meet it, rather than memorizing Lean grammar in advance.

Source voice and ASTIS voice stay separate

When Samplinglib shows a short quotation from Chewi, it is labeled as a source excerpt and linked to the canonical book page. Intuition, expanded proof steps, hidden regularity assumptions, and Lean explanations are ASTIS-authored commentary. A quotation never substitutes for a formal proof, and an ASTIS explanation is never attributed to the textbook author.

Lean statement

theorem chewi_display_1_1_7
    {Omega : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Omega]
    (eta : ℝ≥0 → Omega → ℝ) (mu : Measure Omega) (T : ℝ≥0)
    (hη : AEMeasurable
      (fun z : Omega × ℝ≥0 => ENNReal.ofReal ((eta z.2 z.1) ^ 2))
      (processTimeMeasure mu T)) :
    processL2Energy eta mu T =
      ∫⁻ omega, ∫⁻ t, ENNReal.ofReal ((eta t omega) ^ 2)
        ∂(TimeMeasure.upTo T) ∂mu :=
  lintegral_prod _ hη

/-- Almost-sure local square integrability on `[0,T]`, the weaker condition
used when Chewi extends stochastic integration by localization. -/
Common pitfall. A wrapper or display identity is not a new analytic theorem merely because it has its own Lean name. Check the statement, hypotheses, and downstream consumers before interpreting its mathematical contribution.