Samplinglib
Lean gate passed 2026-08-19T06:32:39.895922+00:00 · 7bcd37294df1
Reviewed teaching declaration · ito-elementary.chewi-display-1-1-6

chewi_display_1_1_6

compiled Samplinglib leaf Compiled explicit smoke test

The expected squared elementary Ito integral is exactly the probability-time L2 energy of its integrand.

Plain-English statement

The expected squared elementary Ito integral is exactly the probability-time L2 energy of its integrand.

Scope guard. This card records a compiled local declaration. Its mathematical scope is exactly the Lean statement below; the Registry note and source correspondence may describe motivation but do not strengthen it.

Mathematical statement

E[|I_[0,T](eta)|^2] = E[integral_0^T |eta_t|^2 dt].

Intuition

Each Brownian increment contributes its elapsed time as variance, so the diagonal sum is the integral of the step process's squared coefficients over its clipped time cells.

Conditions

  • an elementary adapted process
  • Brownian motion relative to the filtration
  • the stopped nonnegative-time Lebesgue measure

Why these conditions cannot be dropped

  • the Brownian law supplies increment variance
  • adaptedness supplies coefficient-increment independence
  • the time measure turns each half-open cell into its clipped length
  • measurability permits Tonelli on probability times time

Proof route

  • apply the orthogonal expansion in display (1.1.5)
  • evaluate every diagonal term
  • evaluate the process L2 energy cell by cell
  • identify the two finite sums

Lean interface notes

  • the left side is converted with ENNReal.ofReal
  • processL2Energy uses the product of mu and TimeMeasure.upTo T
  • this theorem covers elementary processes; L2 completion for the general Ito integral remains open
Lean learning studio · mathematics → formal proof

Read the mathematics first, then descend into Lean

You do not need to know Lean before opening this panel. The page keeps the paper-level theorem, rigorous proof obligations, exact Lean declaration, and proof dependencies as separate layers so a first-time reader can move down one layer at a time.

BeginnerWhy this theorem exists → intuition → statement → one hand calculation. Hide proof-engineering detail.
RigorousExpose assumptions, hidden measure/limit/domain issues, proof route, and rigorous references.
Lean learnerOpen the exact declaration, proof tree/network, syntax glossary, and line-by-line explanation.

Proof architecture

Start with the tree when learning: prerequisites sit below the theorem and downstream results sit above it. Switch to the network when you want to understand where this declaration lives in the local formal library. Every mapped node is clickable.

Loading source-derived dependency evidence…

Graph rule: only dependencies found by the ASTIS source scan are drawn. Missing tactic indirection is treated as an under-approximation; the site never invents an edge just to make a prettier graph.

How to read the exact Lean declaration

Read a Lean theorem left-to-right exactly as you would unpack a mathematical sentence: name → ambient types → automatically inferred structures → explicit hypotheses → conclusion → proof. Then read the proof top-to-bottom as transformations of the current goal.

  1. NameWhat reusable mathematical fact is being created?
  2. ParametersWhich symbols are arbitrary, and which structures are inferred by typeclass search?
  3. PropositionAfter the colon, translate the Lean expression back into a paper statement.
  4. Proof actionsAfter by, ask what each tactic does to the mathematical goal—not only what syntax it uses.

Syntax used on this page

This glossary is filtered to syntax that actually occurs in the declaration above. Open a symbol only when you meet it, rather than memorizing Lean grammar in advance.

Source voice and ASTIS voice stay separate

When Samplinglib shows a short quotation from Chewi, it is labeled as a source excerpt and linked to the canonical book page. Intuition, expanded proof steps, hidden regularity assumptions, and Lean explanations are ASTIS-authored commentary. A quotation never substitutes for a formal proof, and an ASTIS explanation is never attributed to the textbook author.

Lean statement

theorem chewi_display_1_1_6
    {Ω : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω}
    {B : ℝ≥0 → Ω → ℝ} {filtration : Filtration ℝ≥0 m} {μ : Measure Ω}
    {n : ℕ} (eta : ElementaryAdaptedProcess filtration n)
    (hB : IsBrownianMotionWithFiltration B filtration μ) (T : ℝ≥0) :
    ENNReal.ofReal (∫ omega, elementaryItoIntegral eta B T omega ^ 2 ∂μ) =
      processL2Energy eta.value μ T := by
  let _ : IsProbabilityMeasure μ := hB.isProbabilityMeasure
  rw [elementaryItoIntegral_sq_eq_sum eta hB T]
  rw [processL2Energy_value eta μ T]

end ElementaryItoIsometry
end StochasticProcesses
end TechnicalLemmas
end AutoSamplingTheory
Common pitfall. A wrapper or display identity is not a new analytic theorem merely because it has its own Lean name. Check the statement, hypotheses, and downstream consumers before interpreting its mathematical contribution.