Samplinglib
Lean gate not recorded for this source state main · 9bb7a7394ab0
Samplinglib mathematical lesson

Actual PBPS squared defect: positive complex lift

AutoSamplingTheory.ExampleCases.ProximalBPS.DefectComplexLift.actual_positive_defect_complex_lift · theorem · Teaching coverage

Read this first

Mathematical statement

Let E be a finite-dimensional real Hilbert Borel space with canonical volume, including the explicit rank-zero extension. Let V:E→ℝ be C², let 0<α≤β, and assume α‖v‖²≤D²V(x)[v,v]≤β‖v‖² for every x,v. Assume η>0 and βη≤1. Define μ(dx) proportional to exp(−V(x))dx, J as the law of (X,X+√η Z) for independent X∼μ,Z∼N(0,I), ν=J.snd, and Λ as the law of (Y,2X−Y) under J. The laws μ,J,ν are probabilities. There exists a Markov kernel S with, for every y, S(y)=volume.tilted(x↦−V((y+x)/2)−‖y−x‖²/(8η)), Λ.IsCondKernel S, Λ.fst=ν and Λ.snd=ν. There exists a selfadjoint bounded T on L²(ν;ℝ) such that for every u, ‖Tu‖≤‖u‖, Tu(y)=∫u(x)S(y,dx) ν-almost everywhere, and ∫Tu dν=∫u dν. Set D=I−T²; this exact full-domain squared defect is positive. Define the actual quotient maps ιu=u+0i, Rg=Re g, Qg=Im g and Cg=conj(g). Then ι preserves norm, Cg=g iff g=ιu for some real u, and there exists a bounded complex-linear positive Dc on L²(ν;ℂ) such that Dc g=ιD(Rg)+iιD(Qg), Dc(ιu)=ι(Du), and C(Dc g)=Dc(Cg), universally on their displayed domains. The operator T, positivity, kernel/law certificates and Dc are produced conclusions. No real Γ/root/descent/inverse is asserted.

\[D=I-T^2\ge0\text{ on actual }L^2(\nu;\mathbb R),\quad D_{\mathbb C}g=\iota D(\operatorname{Re}g)+i\iota D(\operatorname{Im}g),\quad D_{\mathbb C}\ge0,\quad D_{\mathbb C}\iota=\iota D,\quad CD_{\mathbb C}=D_{\mathbb C}C.\]
Lean statement · actual_positive_defect_complex_lift

Let E be a finite-dimensional real Hilbert Borel space with canonical volume, including the explicit rank-zero extension. Let V:E→ℝ be C², let 0<α≤β, and assume α‖v‖²≤D²V(x)[v,v]≤β‖v‖² for every x,v. Assume η>0 and βη≤1. Define μ(dx) proportional to exp(−V(x))dx, J as the law of (X,X+√η Z) for independent X∼μ,Z∼N(0,I), ν=J.snd, and Λ as the law of (Y,2X−Y) under J. The laws μ,J,ν are probabilities. There exists a Markov kernel S with, for every y, S(y)=volume.tilted(x↦−V((y+x)/2)−‖y−x‖²/(8η)), Λ.IsCondKernel S, Λ.fst=ν and Λ.snd=ν. There exists a selfadjoint bounded T on L²(ν;ℝ) such that for every u, ‖Tu‖≤‖u‖, Tu(y)=∫u(x)S(y,dx) ν-almost everywhere, and ∫Tu dν=∫u dν. Set D=I−T²; this exact full-domain squared defect is positive. Define the actual quotient maps ιu=u+0i, Rg=Re g, Qg=Im g and Cg=conj(g). Then ι preserves norm, Cg=g iff g=ιu for some real u, and there exists a bounded complex-linear positive Dc on L²(ν;ℂ) such that Dc g=ιD(Rg)+iιD(Qg), Dc(ιu)=ι(Du), and C(Dc g)=Dc(Cg), universally on their displayed domains. The operator T, positivity, kernel/law certificates and Dc are produced conclusions. No real Γ/root/descent/inverse is asserted.

Braces mark parameters Lean can infer; square brackets request structures such as a measurable space or probability measure. Named hypotheses are mathematical premises, not facts established by this declaration. Section parameters are described in the mathematical hypotheses above; the module link retains their exact source context.

theorem actual_positive_defect_complex_lift
    {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
    [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
    {V : E → ℝ} {α β : ℝ≥0} {η : ℝ}
    (hα : 0 < (α : ℝ)) (hαβ : α ≤ β) (hV : ContDiff ℝ 2 V)
    (hH : ∀ x v : E,
      (α : ℝ)*‖v‖^2 ≤ (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ∧
      (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ≤ (β : ℝ)*‖v‖^2)
    (hη : 0 < η) (hβη : (β : ℝ)*η ≤ 1) :
    let μ := (volume : Measure E).tilted (fun x => -V x)
    let J := (μ.prod (stdGaussian E)).map
      (fun p : E × E => (p.1,p.1+Real.sqrt η • p.2))
    let ν := J.snd
    let Λ := J.map (fun p : E × E => (p.2,(2 : ℝ) • p.1-p.2))
    let ι : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℂ 2 ν := Complex.ofRealCLM.compLpL 2 ν
    let R : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν := Complex.reCLM.compLpL 2 ν
    let Q : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν := Complex.imCLM.compLpL 2 ν
    let C : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℂ 2 ν := Complex.conjCLE.toContinuousLinearMap.compLpL 2 ν
    IsProbabilityMeasure μ ∧ IsProbabilityMeasure J ∧ IsProbabilityMeasure ν ∧
    ∃ S : Kernel E E, IsMarkovKernel S ∧
      (∀ y, S y = (volume : Measure E).tilted
        (fun x => -V ((1/2 : ℝ) • (y+x)) - ‖y-x‖^2/(8*η))) ∧
      Λ.IsCondKernel S ∧ Λ.fst = ν ∧ Λ.snd = ν ∧
      ∃ T : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν,
        IsSelfAdjoint T ∧
        (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, ‖T u‖ ≤ ‖u‖ ∧
          (T u : E → ℝ) =ᵐ[ν] (fun y => ∫ x, u x ∂S y) ∧
          (∫ y, T u y ∂ν) = ∫ y, u y ∂ν) ∧
        ((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T).IsPositive ∧
        (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, ‖ι u‖ = ‖u‖) ∧
        (∀ g : Lp ℂ 2 ν, C g = g ↔ ∃ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, ι u = g) ∧
        ∃ Dc : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℂ] Lp ℂ 2 ν,
          Dc.IsPositive ∧
          (∀ g : Lp ℂ 2 ν, Dc g =
            ι (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) (R g)) +
            Complex.I • ι (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) (Q g))) ∧
          (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, Dc (ι u) = ι (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) u)) ∧
          (∀ g : Lp ℂ 2 ν, C (Dc g) = Dc (C g))

Exact module and namespace context

Proof roadmap

  1. 1Produce the actual stationary operator

    Invoke the independently verified centered-defect producer under exactly the displayed potential and step assumptions. It supplies the probability laws, a Markov kernel S with the every-state normalized reflection density, Λ.IsCondKernel S, both stationary marginals, and the same selfadjoint contraction T with its AE conditional-integral action and preserved mean. These are conclusions, not caller certificates.

  2. 2Use the produced positive defect

    The same producer proves D=I−T² positive on the full real L²(ν), even though it vanishes on the constant class. Apply the canonical complexification theorem to this D and the actual ν. The resulting embedding, fixed range and complex operator have exactly the displayed formulas; no new positivity or CFC premise is introduced.

  3. 3Keep the next theorem boundary explicit

    This constructs the genuine complex lift needed for a positive-root route. It does not construct the real Γ, prove that a complex root preserves Fix(C), descend that root, establish B.11, or supply centered inverse/polar/dynamics/error/cost conclusions. A separate test of the complex CFC API, if compiled, remains only a complex-root interface check.

Full assumptions and notation

All objects and hypotheses

  • Let E be a finite-dimensional real Hilbert Borel space with canonical volume, including the explicit rank-zero extension. Let V:E→ℝ be C², let 0<α≤β, and assume α‖v‖²≤D²V(x)[v,v]≤β‖v‖² for every x,v. Assume η>0 and βη≤1. Define μ(dx) proportional to exp(−V(x))dx, J as the law of (X,X+√η Z) for independent X∼μ,Z∼N(0,I), ν=J.snd, and Λ as the law of (Y,2X−Y) under J.
  • All kernel, probability, T and D certificates are conclusions. Finite E does not imply finite L2; rank-zero E and αη=1 are explicitly retained.
  • Pointwise conjugation C is real linear; it is distinct from operator adjoint. Complex-root preservation and descent remain separate obligations.

Mathematical proof

1. Produce the actual stationary operator

Invoke the independently verified centered-defect producer under exactly the displayed potential and step assumptions. It supplies the probability laws, a Markov kernel S with the every-state normalized reflection density, Λ.IsCondKernel S, both stationary marginals, and the same selfadjoint contraction T with its AE conditional-integral action and preserved mean. These are conclusions, not caller certificates.

\[S(y,dx)\propto\exp\!\left[-V\!\left(\frac{y+x}{2}\right)-\frac{\|y-x\|^2}{8\eta}\right]dx,\quad Tu(y)=\int u(x)S(y,dx).\]
Corresponding Lean step

CenteredDefectOperator.actual_centered_selfadjoint_defect; hBase; hAll

2. Use the produced positive defect

The same producer proves D=I−T² positive on the full real L²(ν), even though it vanishes on the constant class. Apply the canonical complexification theorem to this D and the actual ν. The resulting embedding, fixed range and complex operator have exactly the displayed formulas; no new positivity or CFC premise is introduced.

\[D=I-T^2\ge0,\quad D_{\mathbb C}g=\iota D(Rg)+i\iota D(Qg),\quad D_{\mathbb C}\iota=\iota D,\quad CD_{\mathbb C}=D_{\mathbb C}C.\]
Corresponding Lean step

L2RealComplexOperator.exists_positive_complex_lift; hD; hformula; hintertwine; hconj

3. Keep the next theorem boundary explicit

This constructs the genuine complex lift needed for a positive-root route. It does not construct the real Γ, prove that a complex root preserves Fix(C), descend that root, establish B.11, or supply centered inverse/polar/dynamics/error/cost conclusions. A separate test of the complex CFC API, if compiled, remains only a complex-root interface check.

\[\text{complex positive lift}\longrightarrow\text{pending real-root preservation and descent}.\]
Corresponding Lean step

actual_positive_defect_complex_lift

Lean verification

The exact proof begins folded immediately after the mathematical argument; the statement is folded beside the claim above.

Lean proof · actual_positive_defect_complex_lift

Produce the actual stationary operator; Use the produced positive defect; Keep the next theorem boundary explicit

Braces mark parameters Lean can infer; square brackets request structures such as a measurable space or probability measure. Named hypotheses are mathematical premises, not facts established by this declaration. Section parameters are described in the mathematical hypotheses above; the module link retains their exact source context.

Download module (.lean)
theorem actual_positive_defect_complex_lift
    {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
    [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
    {V : E → ℝ} {α β : ℝ≥0} {η : ℝ}
    (hα : 0 < (α : ℝ)) (hαβ : α ≤ β) (hV : ContDiff ℝ 2 V)
    (hH : ∀ x v : E,
      (α : ℝ)*‖v‖^2 ≤ (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ∧
      (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ≤ (β : ℝ)*‖v‖^2)
    (hη : 0 < η) (hβη : (β : ℝ)*η ≤ 1) :
    let μ := (volume : Measure E).tilted (fun x => -V x)
    let J := (μ.prod (stdGaussian E)).map
      (fun p : E × E => (p.1,p.1+Real.sqrt η • p.2))
    let ν := J.snd
    let Λ := J.map (fun p : E × E => (p.2,(2 : ℝ) • p.1-p.2))
    let ι : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℂ 2 ν := Complex.ofRealCLM.compLpL 2 ν
    let R : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν := Complex.reCLM.compLpL 2 ν
    let Q : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν := Complex.imCLM.compLpL 2 ν
    let C : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℂ 2 ν := Complex.conjCLE.toContinuousLinearMap.compLpL 2 ν
    IsProbabilityMeasure μ ∧ IsProbabilityMeasure J ∧ IsProbabilityMeasure ν ∧
    ∃ S : Kernel E E, IsMarkovKernel S ∧
      (∀ y, S y = (volume : Measure E).tilted
        (fun x => -V ((1/2 : ℝ) • (y+x)) - ‖y-x‖^2/(8*η))) ∧
      Λ.IsCondKernel S ∧ Λ.fst = ν ∧ Λ.snd = ν ∧
      ∃ T : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν,
        IsSelfAdjoint T ∧
        (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, ‖T u‖ ≤ ‖u‖ ∧
          (T u : E → ℝ) =ᵐ[ν] (fun y => ∫ x, u x ∂S y) ∧
          (∫ y, T u y ∂ν) = ∫ y, u y ∂ν) ∧
        ((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T).IsPositive ∧
        (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, ‖ι u‖ = ‖u‖) ∧
        (∀ g : Lp ℂ 2 ν, C g = g ↔ ∃ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, ι u = g) ∧
        ∃ Dc : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℂ] Lp ℂ 2 ν,
          Dc.IsPositive ∧
          (∀ g : Lp ℂ 2 ν, Dc g =
            ι (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) (R g)) +
            Complex.I • ι (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) (Q g))) ∧
          (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, Dc (ι u) = ι (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) u)) ∧
          (∀ g : Lp ℂ 2 ν, C (Dc g) = Dc (C g)) := by
  classical
  dsimp only
  let μ := (volume : Measure E).tilted (fun x => -V x)
  let J := (μ.prod (stdGaussian E)).map
    (fun p : E × E => (p.1,p.1+Real.sqrt η • p.2))
  let ν := J.snd
  have hBase := CenteredDefectOperator.actual_centered_selfadjoint_defect
    hα hαβ hV hH hη hβη
  rcases hBase with ⟨hμ,hJ,hν,S,hS,hSd,hSc,hSf,hSs,U,hU,hUi,hUs,M,hM,T,hTs,hAll,
    q,hq,hTq,hqi,hzero,hD,hRest⟩
  obtain ⟨hι,hfixed,Dc,hpos,hformula,hintertwine,hconj⟩ :=
    AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.L2RealComplexOperator.exists_positive_complex_lift
      ν ((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) hD
  refine ⟨hμ,hJ,hν,S,hS,hSd,hSc,hSf,hSs,T,hTs,?_,hD,hι,hfixed,Dc,hpos,
    hformula,hintertwine,hconj⟩
  intro u
  exact (hAll u).2.2

end
end AutoSamplingTheory.ExampleCases.ProximalBPS.DefectComplexLift

#print axioms AutoSamplingTheory.ExampleCases.ProximalBPS.DefectComplexLift.actual_positive_defect_complex_lift

Exact module and namespace context

Scope and omitted-condition boundaries
  • No root, real descent of complex CFC root, uniqueness, Gamma0/B15/B16, weakH1/dynamics/main/error/querycost/composition, paper or Goal closure.
Sources, dependencies, and reuse

Source and reuse

Samplinglib parents called

Mathlib API called (external library)

No direct Mathlib call recorded; see the Samplinglib parents.

Mathematical sources

Samplinglib prose is not a quotation or a source-equivalence certificate. Definitions and aliases are explained as constructions, not counted as new mathematical proofs.