Samplinglib
Lean gate not recorded for this source state main · 9bb7a7394ab0

DefectComplexLift: mathematical reading route

Read the statements and derivations in source order. Every result has its own optional Lean statement and proof. Source assumptions, library reuse and unproved boundaries are kept explicit.

  1. Actual PBPS squared defect: positive complex lift
Samplinglib mathematical lesson

Actual PBPS squared defect: positive complex lift

AutoSamplingTheory.ExampleCases.ProximalBPS.DefectComplexLift.actual_positive_defect_complex_lift · theorem · Teaching coverage

Read this first

Mathematical statement

Let E be a finite-dimensional real Hilbert Borel space with canonical volume, including the explicit rank-zero extension. Let V:E→ℝ be C², let 0<α≤β, and assume α‖v‖²≤D²V(x)[v,v]≤β‖v‖² for every x,v. Assume η>0 and βη≤1. Define μ(dx) proportional to exp(−V(x))dx, J as the law of (X,X+√η Z) for independent X∼μ,Z∼N(0,I), ν=J.snd, and Λ as the law of (Y,2X−Y) under J. The laws μ,J,ν are probabilities. There exists a Markov kernel S with, for every y, S(y)=volume.tilted(x↦−V((y+x)/2)−‖y−x‖²/(8η)), Λ.IsCondKernel S, Λ.fst=ν and Λ.snd=ν. There exists a selfadjoint bounded T on L²(ν;ℝ) such that for every u, ‖Tu‖≤‖u‖, Tu(y)=∫u(x)S(y,dx) ν-almost everywhere, and ∫Tu dν=∫u dν. Set D=I−T²; this exact full-domain squared defect is positive. Define the actual quotient maps ιu=u+0i, Rg=Re g, Qg=Im g and Cg=conj(g). Then ι preserves norm, Cg=g iff g=ιu for some real u, and there exists a bounded complex-linear positive Dc on L²(ν;ℂ) such that Dc g=ιD(Rg)+iιD(Qg), Dc(ιu)=ι(Du), and C(Dc g)=Dc(Cg), universally on their displayed domains. The operator T, positivity, kernel/law certificates and Dc are produced conclusions. No real Γ/root/descent/inverse is asserted.

\[D=I-T^2\ge0\text{ on actual }L^2(\nu;\mathbb R),\quad D_{\mathbb C}g=\iota D(\operatorname{Re}g)+i\iota D(\operatorname{Im}g),\quad D_{\mathbb C}\ge0,\quad D_{\mathbb C}\iota=\iota D,\quad CD_{\mathbb C}=D_{\mathbb C}C.\]
Lean statement · actual_positive_defect_complex_lift

Let E be a finite-dimensional real Hilbert Borel space with canonical volume, including the explicit rank-zero extension. Let V:E→ℝ be C², let 0<α≤β, and assume α‖v‖²≤D²V(x)[v,v]≤β‖v‖² for every x,v. Assume η>0 and βη≤1. Define μ(dx) proportional to exp(−V(x))dx, J as the law of (X,X+√η Z) for independent X∼μ,Z∼N(0,I), ν=J.snd, and Λ as the law of (Y,2X−Y) under J. The laws μ,J,ν are probabilities. There exists a Markov kernel S with, for every y, S(y)=volume.tilted(x↦−V((y+x)/2)−‖y−x‖²/(8η)), Λ.IsCondKernel S, Λ.fst=ν and Λ.snd=ν. There exists a selfadjoint bounded T on L²(ν;ℝ) such that for every u, ‖Tu‖≤‖u‖, Tu(y)=∫u(x)S(y,dx) ν-almost everywhere, and ∫Tu dν=∫u dν. Set D=I−T²; this exact full-domain squared defect is positive. Define the actual quotient maps ιu=u+0i, Rg=Re g, Qg=Im g and Cg=conj(g). Then ι preserves norm, Cg=g iff g=ιu for some real u, and there exists a bounded complex-linear positive Dc on L²(ν;ℂ) such that Dc g=ιD(Rg)+iιD(Qg), Dc(ιu)=ι(Du), and C(Dc g)=Dc(Cg), universally on their displayed domains. The operator T, positivity, kernel/law certificates and Dc are produced conclusions. No real Γ/root/descent/inverse is asserted.

Braces mark parameters Lean can infer; square brackets request structures such as a measurable space or probability measure. Named hypotheses are mathematical premises, not facts established by this declaration. Section parameters are described in the mathematical hypotheses above; the module link retains their exact source context.

theorem actual_positive_defect_complex_lift
    {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
    [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
    {V : E → ℝ} {α β : ℝ≥0} {η : ℝ}
    (hα : 0 < (α : ℝ)) (hαβ : α ≤ β) (hV : ContDiff ℝ 2 V)
    (hH : ∀ x v : E,
      (α : ℝ)*‖v‖^2 ≤ (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ∧
      (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ≤ (β : ℝ)*‖v‖^2)
    (hη : 0 < η) (hβη : (β : ℝ)*η ≤ 1) :
    let μ := (volume : Measure E).tilted (fun x => -V x)
    let J := (μ.prod (stdGaussian E)).map
      (fun p : E × E => (p.1,p.1+Real.sqrt η • p.2))
    let ν := J.snd
    let Λ := J.map (fun p : E × E => (p.2,(2 : ℝ) • p.1-p.2))
    let ι : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℂ 2 ν := Complex.ofRealCLM.compLpL 2 ν
    let R : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν := Complex.reCLM.compLpL 2 ν
    let Q : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν := Complex.imCLM.compLpL 2 ν
    let C : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℂ 2 ν := Complex.conjCLE.toContinuousLinearMap.compLpL 2 ν
    IsProbabilityMeasure μ ∧ IsProbabilityMeasure J ∧ IsProbabilityMeasure ν ∧
    ∃ S : Kernel E E, IsMarkovKernel S ∧
      (∀ y, S y = (volume : Measure E).tilted
        (fun x => -V ((1/2 : ℝ) • (y+x)) - ‖y-x‖^2/(8*η))) ∧
      Λ.IsCondKernel S ∧ Λ.fst = ν ∧ Λ.snd = ν ∧
      ∃ T : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν,
        IsSelfAdjoint T ∧
        (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, ‖T u‖ ≤ ‖u‖ ∧
          (T u : E → ℝ) =ᵐ[ν] (fun y => ∫ x, u x ∂S y) ∧
          (∫ y, T u y ∂ν) = ∫ y, u y ∂ν) ∧
        ((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T).IsPositive ∧
        (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, ‖ι u‖ = ‖u‖) ∧
        (∀ g : Lp ℂ 2 ν, C g = g ↔ ∃ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, ι u = g) ∧
        ∃ Dc : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℂ] Lp ℂ 2 ν,
          Dc.IsPositive ∧
          (∀ g : Lp ℂ 2 ν, Dc g =
            ι (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) (R g)) +
            Complex.I • ι (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) (Q g))) ∧
          (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, Dc (ι u) = ι (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) u)) ∧
          (∀ g : Lp ℂ 2 ν, C (Dc g) = Dc (C g))

Exact module and namespace context

Proof roadmap

  1. 1Produce the actual stationary operator

    Invoke the independently verified centered-defect producer under exactly the displayed potential and step assumptions. It supplies the probability laws, a Markov kernel S with the every-state normalized reflection density, Λ.IsCondKernel S, both stationary marginals, and the same selfadjoint contraction T with its AE conditional-integral action and preserved mean. These are conclusions, not caller certificates.

  2. 2Use the produced positive defect

    The same producer proves D=I−T² positive on the full real L²(ν), even though it vanishes on the constant class. Apply the canonical complexification theorem to this D and the actual ν. The resulting embedding, fixed range and complex operator have exactly the displayed formulas; no new positivity or CFC premise is introduced.

  3. 3Keep the next theorem boundary explicit

    This constructs the genuine complex lift needed for a positive-root route. It does not construct the real Γ, prove that a complex root preserves Fix(C), descend that root, establish B.11, or supply centered inverse/polar/dynamics/error/cost conclusions. A separate test of the complex CFC API, if compiled, remains only a complex-root interface check.

Full assumptions and notation

All objects and hypotheses

  • Let E be a finite-dimensional real Hilbert Borel space with canonical volume, including the explicit rank-zero extension. Let V:E→ℝ be C², let 0<α≤β, and assume α‖v‖²≤D²V(x)[v,v]≤β‖v‖² for every x,v. Assume η>0 and βη≤1. Define μ(dx) proportional to exp(−V(x))dx, J as the law of (X,X+√η Z) for independent X∼μ,Z∼N(0,I), ν=J.snd, and Λ as the law of (Y,2X−Y) under J.
  • All kernel, probability, T and D certificates are conclusions. Finite E does not imply finite L2; rank-zero E and αη=1 are explicitly retained.
  • Pointwise conjugation C is real linear; it is distinct from operator adjoint. Complex-root preservation and descent remain separate obligations.

Mathematical proof

1. Produce the actual stationary operator

Invoke the independently verified centered-defect producer under exactly the displayed potential and step assumptions. It supplies the probability laws, a Markov kernel S with the every-state normalized reflection density, Λ.IsCondKernel S, both stationary marginals, and the same selfadjoint contraction T with its AE conditional-integral action and preserved mean. These are conclusions, not caller certificates.

\[S(y,dx)\propto\exp\!\left[-V\!\left(\frac{y+x}{2}\right)-\frac{\|y-x\|^2}{8\eta}\right]dx,\quad Tu(y)=\int u(x)S(y,dx).\]
Corresponding Lean step

CenteredDefectOperator.actual_centered_selfadjoint_defect; hBase; hAll

2. Use the produced positive defect

The same producer proves D=I−T² positive on the full real L²(ν), even though it vanishes on the constant class. Apply the canonical complexification theorem to this D and the actual ν. The resulting embedding, fixed range and complex operator have exactly the displayed formulas; no new positivity or CFC premise is introduced.

\[D=I-T^2\ge0,\quad D_{\mathbb C}g=\iota D(Rg)+i\iota D(Qg),\quad D_{\mathbb C}\iota=\iota D,\quad CD_{\mathbb C}=D_{\mathbb C}C.\]
Corresponding Lean step

L2RealComplexOperator.exists_positive_complex_lift; hD; hformula; hintertwine; hconj

3. Keep the next theorem boundary explicit

This constructs the genuine complex lift needed for a positive-root route. It does not construct the real Γ, prove that a complex root preserves Fix(C), descend that root, establish B.11, or supply centered inverse/polar/dynamics/error/cost conclusions. A separate test of the complex CFC API, if compiled, remains only a complex-root interface check.

\[\text{complex positive lift}\longrightarrow\text{pending real-root preservation and descent}.\]
Corresponding Lean step

actual_positive_defect_complex_lift

Lean verification

The exact proof begins folded immediately after the mathematical argument; the statement is folded beside the claim above.

Lean proof · actual_positive_defect_complex_lift

Produce the actual stationary operator; Use the produced positive defect; Keep the next theorem boundary explicit

Braces mark parameters Lean can infer; square brackets request structures such as a measurable space or probability measure. Named hypotheses are mathematical premises, not facts established by this declaration. Section parameters are described in the mathematical hypotheses above; the module link retains their exact source context.

Download module (.lean)
theorem actual_positive_defect_complex_lift
    {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
    [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
    {V : E → ℝ} {α β : ℝ≥0} {η : ℝ}
    (hα : 0 < (α : ℝ)) (hαβ : α ≤ β) (hV : ContDiff ℝ 2 V)
    (hH : ∀ x v : E,
      (α : ℝ)*‖v‖^2 ≤ (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ∧
      (fderiv ℝ (fderiv ℝ V) x v) v ≤ (β : ℝ)*‖v‖^2)
    (hη : 0 < η) (hβη : (β : ℝ)*η ≤ 1) :
    let μ := (volume : Measure E).tilted (fun x => -V x)
    let J := (μ.prod (stdGaussian E)).map
      (fun p : E × E => (p.1,p.1+Real.sqrt η • p.2))
    let ν := J.snd
    let Λ := J.map (fun p : E × E => (p.2,(2 : ℝ) • p.1-p.2))
    let ι : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℂ 2 ν := Complex.ofRealCLM.compLpL 2 ν
    let R : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν := Complex.reCLM.compLpL 2 ν
    let Q : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν := Complex.imCLM.compLpL 2 ν
    let C : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℂ 2 ν := Complex.conjCLE.toContinuousLinearMap.compLpL 2 ν
    IsProbabilityMeasure μ ∧ IsProbabilityMeasure J ∧ IsProbabilityMeasure ν ∧
    ∃ S : Kernel E E, IsMarkovKernel S ∧
      (∀ y, S y = (volume : Measure E).tilted
        (fun x => -V ((1/2 : ℝ) • (y+x)) - ‖y-x‖^2/(8*η))) ∧
      Λ.IsCondKernel S ∧ Λ.fst = ν ∧ Λ.snd = ν ∧
      ∃ T : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν,
        IsSelfAdjoint T ∧
        (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, ‖T u‖ ≤ ‖u‖ ∧
          (T u : E → ℝ) =ᵐ[ν] (fun y => ∫ x, u x ∂S y) ∧
          (∫ y, T u y ∂ν) = ∫ y, u y ∂ν) ∧
        ((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T).IsPositive ∧
        (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, ‖ι u‖ = ‖u‖) ∧
        (∀ g : Lp ℂ 2 ν, C g = g ↔ ∃ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, ι u = g) ∧
        ∃ Dc : Lp ℂ 2 ν →L[ℂ] Lp ℂ 2 ν,
          Dc.IsPositive ∧
          (∀ g : Lp ℂ 2 ν, Dc g =
            ι (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) (R g)) +
            Complex.I • ι (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) (Q g))) ∧
          (∀ u : Lp ℝ 2 ν, Dc (ι u) = ι (((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) u)) ∧
          (∀ g : Lp ℂ 2 ν, C (Dc g) = Dc (C g)) := by
  classical
  dsimp only
  let μ := (volume : Measure E).tilted (fun x => -V x)
  let J := (μ.prod (stdGaussian E)).map
    (fun p : E × E => (p.1,p.1+Real.sqrt η • p.2))
  let ν := J.snd
  have hBase := CenteredDefectOperator.actual_centered_selfadjoint_defect
    hα hαβ hV hH hη hβη
  rcases hBase with ⟨hμ,hJ,hν,S,hS,hSd,hSc,hSf,hSs,U,hU,hUi,hUs,M,hM,T,hTs,hAll,
    q,hq,hTq,hqi,hzero,hD,hRest⟩
  obtain ⟨hι,hfixed,Dc,hpos,hformula,hintertwine,hconj⟩ :=
    AutoSamplingTheory.TechnicalLemmas.Measure.L2RealComplexOperator.exists_positive_complex_lift
      ν ((1 : Lp ℝ 2 ν →L[ℝ] Lp ℝ 2 ν)-T*T) hD
  refine ⟨hμ,hJ,hν,S,hS,hSd,hSc,hSf,hSs,T,hTs,?_,hD,hι,hfixed,Dc,hpos,
    hformula,hintertwine,hconj⟩
  intro u
  exact (hAll u).2.2

end
end AutoSamplingTheory.ExampleCases.ProximalBPS.DefectComplexLift

#print axioms AutoSamplingTheory.ExampleCases.ProximalBPS.DefectComplexLift.actual_positive_defect_complex_lift

Exact module and namespace context

Scope and omitted-condition boundaries
  • No root, real descent of complex CFC root, uniqueness, Gamma0/B15/B16, weakH1/dynamics/main/error/querycost/composition, paper or Goal closure.
Sources, dependencies, and reuse

Source and reuse

Samplinglib parents called

Mathlib API called (external library)

No direct Mathlib call recorded; see the Samplinglib parents.

Mathematical sources

Samplinglib prose is not a quotation or a source-equivalence certificate. Definitions and aliases are explained as constructions, not counted as new mathematical proofs.