Define and prove an isometric finite-to-continuous embedding.
Acceptance: Inner products and normalization match the stated quadrature/Fock convention.
planned; no claimed closure
Structure before circuit tricks
Schrödingerisation uses auxiliary profiles in both continuous-variable and qubit implementations, but their resources are not interchangeable.
research target setting:finite-energy-cv-dv-embedding
Relate a declared finite-energy oscillator encoding to qubit-grid preparation with a rigorous embedding and separate resource budgets.
Access model: An explicit isometric embedding V_N, cutoff, grid or Fock truncation, energy/squeezing and non-Gaussian gate model.
A model-specific conversion, approximation and preparation theorem, not a universal equivalence of CV and DV costs.
The finite Hermite state is a useful first example. No CV–DV equivalence or GKP preparation theorem is currently supplied by this route.
Acceptance: Inner products and normalization match the stated quadrature/Fock convention.
planned; no claimed closure
Acceptance: All cutoff, domain and regularity hypotheses explicit.
planned; no claimed closure
Acceptance: Separate DV gates and CV physical resources plus total state error.
planned; no claimed closure
Next bounded advance: Choose a finite-energy Hermite-smoothed profile and one embedding before comparing grid, oscillator or GKP implementations.
Named Lean substrates below have their own exact signatures. They do not certify every sentence or proposed generalization on this page.
QuantumBlockEncoding.ConstructiveHermitePreparation.prepare_spec
source-survey-pending
First specify the energy and non-Gaussian resource model; no cross-model lower-bound transfer is asserted.
Same-model key: setting:finite-energy-cv-dv-embedding
No external source is attached to this local mechanism note. It remains authored exposition, not a literature-priority claim.
Download bounded agent / contributor packet
python3 website/scripts/research_atlas.py context --route spw-cvdv